Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test: Add unit test for internal/statsd/parser.go #32

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

gru-agent[bot]
Copy link

@gru-agent gru-agent bot commented Mar 14, 2025

Trigger Info

Trigger Type Triggered By Source File Assignment
Auto Trigger TestGru internal/version/version.go Detail

Summary

This PR enhances the test coverage for the StatsD parser by adding several new test cases and functions. The key changes include:

  1. TestParseStatsdLine: Introduces a comprehensive set of test cases to validate the parsing of different StatsD metric types, including counters, gauges, sets, timings, histograms, and distributions. It also tests the handling of Datadog tags and various error scenarios.

  2. TestParseKeyValue: Adds tests to ensure the correct parsing of key-value pairs, covering different edge cases such as missing keys or values and multiple equal signs.

  3. TestParser: Implements tests for the parser function to verify its behavior with single and multiple metrics, handling of empty lines, and Datadog events.

  4. Refactoring: Utilizes the assert package for more readable and concise test assertions.

These additions aim to improve the reliability and robustness of the StatsD parser by ensuring it correctly handles a wide range of input scenarios.

Coverage

The change in coverage value, such as: 0% -> 50%, indicates that the coverage was 0% before writing the tests and 50% after writing them.

https://web.dev/articles/ta-code-coverage

Type Change
lines 0% -> 0%
statements 0% -> 0%
functions 0% -> 0%
branches 0% -> 0%

Test Statuses

Status Change
$schema http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#
passed 7 -> 6 🔻
failed 0 -> 0
skipped 0 -> 0
error 0 -> 0
source ai

Tip

You can @gru-agent and leave your feedback. TestGru will make adjustments based on your input

Tip

You can @gru-agent rebase to rebase the PR.

Tip

You can @gru-agent redo to reset or rebase before redoing the PR.

Tip

To modify the test code yourself, click here Edit Test Code

@CLAassistant
Copy link

CLA assistant check
Thank you for your submission! We really appreciate it. Like many open source projects, we ask that you sign our Contributor License Agreement before we can accept your contribution.
You have signed the CLA already but the status is still pending? Let us recheck it.

@guance-review-bot
Copy link

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: gru-agent[bot]

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

Copy link

Quality Gate Failed Quality Gate failed

Failed conditions
19.2% Duplication on New Code (required ≤ 3%)

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant