Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Delete .github/workflows/snorkell-auto-documentation.yml #150

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 6, 2025

Conversation

guibranco
Copy link
Member

@guibranco guibranco commented Jan 6, 2025

πŸ“‘ Description

Delete .github/workflows/snorkell-auto-documentation.yml

βœ… Checks

  • My pull request adheres to the code style of this project
  • My code requires changes to the documentation
  • I have updated the documentation as required
  • All the tests have passed

☒️ Does this introduce a breaking change?

  • Yes
  • No

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Removed GitHub Actions workflow for automated AI documentation generation.

Copy link

Review changes with Β SemanticDiff

Copy link

gooroo-dev bot commented Jan 6, 2025

Please double check the following review of the pull request:

Issues counts

🐞Mistake πŸ€ͺTypo 🚨Security πŸš€Performance πŸ’ͺBest Practices πŸ“–Readability ❓Others
0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Changes in the diff

  • βž– Removed the GitHub Actions workflow file snorkell-auto-documentation.yml.

Identified Issues

No issues were identified in the incoming changes since the file was entirely removed, and no new code was introduced.

Explanation

Since the pull request involves the deletion of a file without introducing new code, there are no specific issues or improvements to address. Additionally, no tests are required for the removal of a file. The change is straightforward and does not introduce any new functionality or code paths that require testing.

Summon me to re-review when updated! Yours, Gooroo.dev
Your thoughts matter! Please reply or add a reaction.

Copy link

instapr bot commented Jan 6, 2025

Feedback:

  • Review the necessity of deleting the workflow file as it seems to automate documentation updates.
  • Ensure any dependencies on this workflow are appropriately handled or migrated.

Copy link
Contributor

sourcery-ai bot commented Jan 6, 2025

Reviewer's Guide by Sourcery

This pull request deletes the Snorkell auto-documentation workflow file, .github/workflows/snorkell-auto-documentation.yml.

No diagrams generated as the changes look simple and do not need a visual representation.

File-Level Changes

Change Details Files
Removed the Snorkell auto-documentation workflow.
  • Deleted the workflow file entirely.
.github/workflows/snorkell-auto-documentation.yml

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

  • Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
  • Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
  • Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
    issue from a review comment by replying to it.
  • Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
    request title to generate a title at any time.
  • Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
    the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time. You can also use
    this command to specify where the summary should be inserted.

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

  • Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
    summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
  • Change the review language.
  • Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
  • Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

Copy link

pr-code-reviewer bot commented Jan 6, 2025

πŸ‘‹ Hi there!

Everything looks good!


Automatically generated with the help of gpt-3.5-turbo.
Feedback? Please don't hesitate to drop me an email at [email protected].

Copy link

Potential issues, bugs, and flaws that can introduce unwanted behavior:

  1. /.github/workflows/snorkell-auto-documentation.yml - Complete Deletion of Workflow: The deletion of this workflow could lead to a lack of automatic documentation updates for the project, potentially resulting in outdated or missing documentation in PRs. This may negatively impact knowledge sharing and onboarding for new contributors.

Code suggestions and improvements for better exception handling, logic, standardization, and consistency:

  1. /.github/workflows/snorkell-auto-documentation.yml - Consider Archiving or Refactoring Instead of Deleting: If the workflow is no longer needed, consider archiving it (instead of a complete deletion) so that you have a historical reference for future needs. Alternatively, if it requires updates or fixes, document and fix the issues rather than removing it altogether. This can preserve valuable automation until a final decision is made about its future.

Copy link

korbit-ai bot commented Jan 6, 2025

I was unable to write a description for this pull request. This could be because I only found files I can't scan.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 6, 2025

Walkthrough

The pull request involves the removal of a GitHub Actions workflow file .github/workflows/snorkell-auto-documentation.yml. This workflow was previously configured to automate documentation generation using an AI client, specifically the Snorkell documentation client. The workflow was designed to run on the main branch and could be manually triggered, with the goal of enhancing documentation through AI-generated content.

Changes

File Change Summary
.github/workflows/snorkell-auto-documentation.yml Workflow file completely removed

Suggested labels

size/XS, korbit-code-analysis

Poem

🐰 Hop, hop, workflow goodbye!
AI docs flutter and fly
GitHub Actions take a rest
No more scripts put to the test
Simplicity wins the day! 🌟


πŸ“œ Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

πŸ“₯ Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between eb1d17b and 21d020a.

πŸ“’ Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/snorkell-auto-documentation.yml (0 hunks)
πŸ’€ Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • .github/workflows/snorkell-auto-documentation.yml
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
  • GitHub Check: Analyze (csharp)
  • GitHub Check: Codacy Static Code Analysis

πŸͺ§ Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@guibranco guibranco enabled auto-merge (squash) January 6, 2025 00:34
@gstraccini gstraccini bot added the β˜‘οΈ auto-merge Automatic merging of pull requests (gstraccini-bot) label Jan 6, 2025
Copy link

@korbit-ai korbit-ai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I've completed my review and didn't find any issues.

Need a new review? Comment /korbit-review on this PR and I'll review your latest changes.

Korbit Guide: Usage and Customization

Interacting with Korbit

  • You can manually ask Korbit to review your PR using the /korbit-review command in a comment at the root of your PR.
  • You can ask Korbit to generate a new PR description using the /korbit-generate-pr-description command in any comment on your PR.
  • Too many Korbit comments? I can resolve all my comment threads if you use the /korbit-resolve command in any comment on your PR.
  • Chat with Korbit on issues we post by tagging @korbit-ai in your reply.
  • Help train Korbit to improve your reviews by giving a πŸ‘ or πŸ‘Ž on the comments Korbit posts.

Customizing Korbit

  • Check out our docs on how you can make Korbit work best for you and your team.
  • Customize Korbit for your organization through the Korbit Console.

Current Korbit Configuration

General Settings ​
Setting Value
Review Schedule Automatic excluding drafts
Max Issue Count 10
Automatic PR Descriptions βœ…
Issue Categories ​
Category Enabled
Naming βœ…
Database Operations βœ…
Documentation βœ…
Logging βœ…
Error Handling βœ…
Systems and Environment βœ…
Objects and Data Structures βœ…
Readability and Maintainability βœ…
Asynchronous Processing βœ…
Design Patterns βœ…
Third-Party Libraries βœ…
Performance βœ…
Security βœ…
Functionality βœ…

Feedback and Support

Note

Korbit Pro is free for open source projects πŸŽ‰

Looking to add Korbit to your team? Get started with a free 2 week trial here

@github-actions github-actions bot added the size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. label Jan 6, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@sourcery-ai sourcery-ai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hey @guibranco - I've reviewed your changes - here's some feedback:

Overall Comments:

  • Please provide context on why this workflow file is being removed. Is it being replaced with another documentation solution?
Here's what I looked at during the review
  • 🟒 General issues: all looks good
  • 🟒 Security: all looks good
  • 🟒 Testing: all looks good
  • 🟒 Complexity: all looks good
  • 🟒 Documentation: all looks good

Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨
Help me be more useful! Please click πŸ‘ or πŸ‘Ž on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 6, 2025

Infisical secrets check: β­• Secrets check cancelled!

Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Jan 6, 2025

@AppVeyorBot
Copy link

βœ… Build POC-dotnet-Asterisk 1.0.619 completed (commit fa811e84a2 by @gstraccini[bot])

@guibranco guibranco merged commit fdc177d into main Jan 6, 2025
18 checks passed
@guibranco guibranco deleted the guibranco-patch-1 branch January 6, 2025 00:46
@AppVeyorBot
Copy link

❌ Build POC-dotnet-Asterisk 1.0.260 failed (commit fa811e84a2 by @gstraccini[bot])

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
β˜‘οΈ auto-merge Automatic merging of pull requests (gstraccini-bot) size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants