Added a new certificate-based privilege escalation technique (ECS14-E… #1030
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Dear Maintainers,
Hello, I have learned a lot from HackTricks, and I would like to contribute to the project to help more people benefit from it. Due to my limited English proficiency, please forgive any grammar mistakes and give me a chance to improve them.
This PR primarily updates the domain-escalation.md document in the windows-hardening/active-directory-methodology/ad-certificates section. It introduces additional ADCS exploitation techniques (ECS14–ECS16), or at a minimum, guides readers to resources where they can quickly learn and understand these methodologies.
Due to language barriers, I have referenced some parts directly from the original articles. However, I made sure that all content is legitimate to quote, and I clearly indicated the sources.
Thank you for your time and consideration.
Best regards