-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 590
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Implement LazySequenceCopy.pop(i)
#3987
Merged
+83
−50
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
8 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
784d5d9
implement LazySequenceCopy.pop(i) for arbitrary indices
tybug a7ee6da
use LazySequenceCopy.pop(i) in place of pop last + swap
tybug e2ef70a
add release notes
tybug a8a11b3
add another test
tybug cc69401
move pairwise to compat
tybug 474eeb8
type properly
tybug 89c3602
rewrite release notes
tybug 9368da7
simplify implementation
tybug File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@ | ||
RELEASE_TYPE: patch | ||
|
||
This patch improves our shrinking of unique collections, such as :func:`~hypothesis.strategies.dictionaries`, | ||
:func:`~hypothesis.strategies.sets`, and :func:`~hypothesis.strategies.lists` with ``unique=True``. |
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -124,10 +124,10 @@ def test_flags_minimize_to_first_named_flag(): | |
|
||
|
||
def test_flags_minimizes_bit_count(): | ||
shrunk = minimal(st.sampled_from(LargeFlag), lambda f: bit_count(f.value) > 1) | ||
# Ideal would be (bit0 | bit1), but: | ||
# minimal(st.sets(st.sampled_from(range(10)), min_size=3)) == {0, 8, 9} # not {0, 1, 2} | ||
assert shrunk == LargeFlag.bit0 | LargeFlag.bit63 # documents actual behaviour | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Nice, I remember scratching my head over this! There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. thanks to your comment here, it was the only reason I looked into this 🙂 |
||
assert ( | ||
minimal(st.sampled_from(LargeFlag), lambda f: bit_count(f.value) > 1) | ||
== LargeFlag.bit0 | LargeFlag.bit1 | ||
) | ||
|
||
|
||
def test_flags_finds_all_bits_set(): | ||
|
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I agree that this would be nice but is not merge-blocking important.