Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Physical track tables #155

Open
andkov opened this issue Oct 21, 2016 · 5 comments
Open

Physical track tables #155

andkov opened this issue Oct 21, 2016 · 5 comments

Comments

@andkov
Copy link
Member

andkov commented Oct 21, 2016 •
edited
Loading

Tables of results

study tables tables anatomy
eas word html html
elsa word html html
hrs word html html
ilse ... ...
lasa word html html
map word html html
nuage ... ...
octo word html html
satsa word html html
andkov added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 21, 2016
@andkov
#155 kickstarting physical seed
055773d
andkov added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 21, 2016
@andkov
#155 report dump
b9cdc1c
@ampiccinin
Copy link
Member

thanks! Can you please check the axes? I think some of the labels may be misplaced? Some odd things like grip where I think it should be PEF (based on the magnitude)?

@andkov
Copy link
Member Author

andkov commented Oct 31, 2016

@ampiccinin, yes, I have examined the .out files and corrected the model names (97f33af) the next iteration of reports should sort these two models out and draw the correct graphs and tables

@andkov
Copy link
Member Author

andkov commented Oct 31, 2016

@ampiccinin , the new report with corrected names for EAS has been upload and is available after the link above

andkov added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 31, 2016
@andkov
#155 summary of correlations published
254b4eb
andkov added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 31, 2016
@andkov
#155 updated reports for physical
1e3b189
andkov added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 7, 2016
@andkov
#155 added short version of tables
323dd15 
now the rows are sorted to cluster models of equivalent pairs. Also, the
parallel versions of the table include only correlation, but no
covariance.
@ampiccinin
@ampiccinin
Copy link
Member

N for HRS too low. Still pointing to old files? Thanks!

@andkov
Copy link
Member Author

andkov commented Nov 11, 2016

@ampiccinin , I think i found the point of confusion. The files that Chenkai sent the latest, the ones you pointed out having short names and high Ns (I've stored them separately here: ./studies/hrs/physical-cognitive/from-email-2016-10-31)) are all physical-cognitive. Naturally, this tables of phys-phys do not reflect them. The phys-phys models, while containing the estimated correlations have only ~280 observation (example)

Are there phys-phys models that I've neglected to include? Please let me know, if you recover any.

andkov added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 11, 2016
@andkov
#155 updated HRS models
ff8e6ac 
Now the models contain a large N
andkov added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 14, 2016
@andkov
FULL correlation tables
74c61a3 
@ampiccinin , this is in response to your request (b) include both SE
and CI in the same tables (for P-P and for P-C) so we can confirm
whether this is where the inconsistency is showing up.) from
#156 (comment).
Once we decide what indices to keep, i'll create a censored table that
contains fewer indices.  These tables are accessible through links in
the respective issues (#152, #153, #154, #155)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@andkov @ampiccinin