Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Equivalence based queries optimized - vacuity, redundancy and strongEquivalence queries #536

Merged
merged 11 commits into from
Jul 2, 2023

Conversation

tanyaveksler
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

Keeping optimized properties separated per rule (instead of the union of all policy rules)
Fixed handling HostEPs in optimized implementation.

Signed-off-by: Tanya <[email protected]>
Keeping optimized properties separated per rule (instead of the union of all policy rules)
Fixed handling HostEPs in optimized implementation.

Signed-off-by: Tanya <[email protected]>
Returning 'passed' code for skipped queries.

Signed-off-by: Tanya <[email protected]>
Keeping optimized properties separated per rule (instead of the union of all policy rules)
Fixed handling HostEPs in optimized implementation.

Signed-off-by: Tanya <[email protected]>
Keeping optimized properties separated per rule (instead of the union of all policy rules)
Fixed handling HostEPs in optimized implementation.

Signed-off-by: Tanya <[email protected]>
…e times for the same rule, for example when a rule appears twice in a config).

Signed-off-by: Tanya <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Tanya <[email protected]>
@tanyaveksler tanyaveksler requested a review from adisos June 20, 2023 12:32
@tanyaveksler tanyaveksler self-assigned this Jun 20, 2023
@tanyaveksler tanyaveksler changed the title Equivalence based queries optimized - vacuity and redundancy queries Equivalence based queries optimized - vacuity, redundancy and strongEquivalence queries Jun 20, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants