Added Survey dialog on Structured Menu

[MeSophie]

Fixes partially #6718

@lilyclements, @lloyddewit I have added Survey dialog on Structured menu. This replace PR #8258. Please have a look.

[lloyddewit]

@rdstern please could you test before I review (i.e. our normal process)? thanks

[rdstern]

I just note the trivial point that on the Structured menu we could add the ... to indicate we will load a dialog.
Then I need @lilyclements to test this one. I am not up to the different options.

[N-thony]

I just note the trivial point that on the Structured menu we could add the ... to indicate we will load a dialog. Then I need @lilyclements to test this one. I am not up to the different options.

@lilyclements can you test this?

[lilyclements]

@MeSophie I am immediately getting errors, and so before I test this any further, have you tested this? I suspect the issue is in the ID control. Is this meant to be a ucrReceiver or a ucrInput?

The design looks really nice and neatly laid out, so really good job there. But I can't seem to line it up with the design specified in #6718 (one example is that the "weights" receiver is on the SRS tab here but not in #6718). Were these diversions discussed somewhere on GitHub so I can check the design lines up?

Thanks.

[MeSophie]

@lilyclements I have tested the dialog before. ID is a input for SRS, and Stratified and Received for Cluster according to what I understand from R package. Maybe I am wrong.

And for the difference between the new design and the one in #6718 I didn't discuss about it. I added weight in SRS method also according to parameters using by svydesign function. I couldn't discuss more about this design because @HawardKetoyoMsatsi is not longer in the team.

[lilyclements]

@MeSophie Thanks for this explanation. I think before going further with a review I want to check I am comparing this design to the correct "finalised" design discussed.
@rdstern do you know if there were discussions on the design to change it from #6718 to a different layout? If so, do you know where these discussions took place?

[rdstern]

@lilyclements sorry, I don't know of a discussion on a changed design.

[lilyclements]

@rdstern great thanks. In which case @MeSophie can you change the design here to be consistent with issue #6718

[N-thony]

@rdstern great thanks. In which case @MeSophie can you change the design here to be consistent with issue #6718

@MeSophie any progress?

[N-thony]

@rdstern great thanks. In which case @MeSophie can you change the design here to be consistent with issue #6718

@MeSophie any progress?

@MeSophie how is it going here?