-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 40
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
SQLite benchmark #113
SQLite benchmark #113
Conversation
Hi @m-atalla, Thanks for the PR!
Additionally, I think your PR would be a good to value addition to the functional tests as well. This can be done by linking it with Thanks, |
Thanks for your feedback @svkeerthy. I'm not very familiar with how Unfortunately, I don't have much free time this week, so I have turned this PR into a draft for now, will open it again and ping you once this is ready. |
Correct, the tests status should be reported in the runner, it looks like the IR file is being generated correctly. Let me double check and verify that its working as intended. |
@svkeerthy this is fixed, the test action is working correctly now. Sorry I had some cached build files that made this hard to debug on my end. Anyways, All I needed was to re-order the CMake commands so SQLite stuff is generated before the test script is configured and the benchmarks files are copied. I think next I can look into profiling so that we know what portions of IR2Vec could benefit the most from parallelizing. I will share my findings in #101 by next Friday if I find anything worth sharing. |
Great! Sounds good. |
Hi,
This PR adds SQLite Amalgamation as a benchmark to test IR2Vec performance.
@svkeerthy I have a couple of points that I'm not sure about:
Let me know if you have any additional suggestions.
Thanks,
Mohamed