Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

♻️Storage: Code refactoring prior to changes #7088

Draft
wants to merge 53 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

sanderegg
Copy link
Member

What do these changes do?

Related issue/s

How to test

Dev-ops checklist

@sanderegg sanderegg added a:storage issue related to storage service t:maintenance Some planned maintenance work labels Jan 24, 2025
@sanderegg sanderegg added this to the Singularity milestone Jan 24, 2025
@sanderegg sanderegg self-assigned this Jan 24, 2025
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 24, 2025

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 64.28571% with 5 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 81.45%. Comparing base (69cf7cb) to head (7f938a5).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

❗ There is a different number of reports uploaded between BASE (69cf7cb) and HEAD (7f938a5). Click for more details.

HEAD has 10 uploads less than BASE
Flag BASE (69cf7cb) HEAD (7f938a5)
unittests 30 22
integrationtests 6 4
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #7088      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   87.26%   81.45%   -5.82%     
==========================================
  Files        1634     1433     -201     
  Lines       64264    58771    -5493     
  Branches     2051     1655     -396     
==========================================
- Hits        56082    47869    -8213     
- Misses       7845    10643    +2798     
+ Partials      337      259      -78     
Flag Coverage Δ
integrationtests 51.71% <100.00%> (-13.07%) ⬇️
unittests 81.57% <64.28%> (-3.94%) ⬇️
Components Coverage Δ
api 76.84% <ø> (ø)
pkg_aws_library ∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_dask_task_models_library ∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_models_library 91.43% <100.00%> (ø)
pkg_notifications_library ∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_postgres_database ∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_service_integration 70.18% <ø> (ø)
pkg_service_library 74.06% <20.00%> (-0.07%) ⬇️
pkg_settings_library ∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_simcore_sdk 65.64% <50.00%> (-19.75%) ⬇️
agent 96.45% <ø> (ø)
api_server 88.06% <ø> (-2.49%) ⬇️
autoscaling 96.10% <ø> (ø)
catalog 90.32% <ø> (ø)
clusters_keeper 99.24% <ø> (ø)
dask_sidecar 91.26% <ø> (ø)
datcore_adapter 93.18% <ø> (ø)
director 76.92% <ø> (ø)
director_v2 84.58% <ø> (-6.69%) ⬇️
dynamic_scheduler 97.21% <ø> (ø)
dynamic_sidecar 88.81% <ø> (-0.95%) ⬇️
efs_guardian 90.39% <ø> (ø)
invitations 93.42% <ø> (ø)
osparc_gateway_server ∅ <ø> (∅)
payments 92.66% <ø> (ø)
resource_usage_tracker 89.28% <ø> (ø)
storage ∅ <ø> (∅)
webclient ∅ <ø> (∅)
webserver 72.80% <100.00%> (-12.12%) ⬇️

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 69cf7cb...7f938a5. Read the comment docs.

@sanderegg sanderegg force-pushed the storage/refactoring branch from 9cf574f to d722d04 Compare January 24, 2025 16:27
Copy link

Quality Gate Failed Quality Gate failed

Failed conditions
2 Security Hotspots
B Reliability Rating on New Code (required ≥ A)

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

Catch issues before they fail your Quality Gate with our IDE extension SonarQube for IDE

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
a:storage issue related to storage service t:maintenance Some planned maintenance work
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant