Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat/add_ibc_transfer_support #216

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 12, 2024
Merged

feat/add_ibc_transfer_support #216

merged 1 commit into from
Apr 12, 2024

Conversation

aarmoa
Copy link
Collaborator

@aarmoa aarmoa commented Apr 11, 2024

  • Added support for IBC Transfer module queries
  • Added support in Composer to create the IBC transfer message
  • Added example scripts

Solves CHAIN-75

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Enhanced IBC Transfer capabilities within the ChainClient interface, including support for denom traces, denom hash, escrow addresses, and total escrow queries.
    • Added example programs for token transfers and various queries related to IBC protocol using the InjectiveLabs SDK.

@aarmoa aarmoa requested a review from nicolasbaum April 11, 2024 14:04
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Apr 11, 2024

Walkthrough

The recent updates enhance the ChainClient interface and its implementation, specifically adding support for the IBC Transfer module. This includes new functionalities for managing and querying denom traces, hashes, escrow addresses, and total escrow amounts. Additionally, several example programs have been provided to demonstrate the usage of these new features in a Cosmos-based blockchain environment using the InjectiveLabs SDK.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
client/chain/chain.go Added methods in ChainClient for IBC Transfer module interactions.
client/chain/chain_test_support.go Extended MockChainClient with functions for IBC Transfer module testing.
examples/chain/ibc/transfer/... Added example programs for token transfers and queries related to IBC Transfer module using InjectiveLabs SDK.

🐰✨
In the code where bytes dance,
A rabbit hopped, took a chance.
New paths woven, threads of light,
Through IBC's flight in the night.
Cheers to codes new home, 🎉 delight!
🐰✨


Recent Review Details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between f7b8238 and d6867e6.
Files selected for processing (8)
  • client/chain/chain.go (5 hunks)
  • client/chain/chain_test_support.go (2 hunks)
  • examples/chain/ibc/transfer/1_MsgTransfer/example.go (1 hunks)
  • examples/chain/ibc/transfer/query/1_DenomTrace/example.go (1 hunks)
  • examples/chain/ibc/transfer/query/2_DenomTraces/example.go (1 hunks)
  • examples/chain/ibc/transfer/query/3_DenomHash/example.go (1 hunks)
  • examples/chain/ibc/transfer/query/4_EscrowAddress/example.go (1 hunks)
  • examples/chain/ibc/transfer/query/5_TotalEscrowForDenom/example.go (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (4)
client/chain/chain_test_support.go (1)

585-603: Ensure that the mock implementations for the IBC Transfer module functions in MockChainClient are correctly returning the expected types. These functions are crucial for unit testing the new IBC functionalities.

client/chain/chain.go (3)

248-253: Consider adding logging for debugging and operational visibility in IBC Transfer methods.

Adding detailed logging at the start and end of each method can help in debugging and understanding the flow, especially in production environments.


248-253: Validate inputs for new IBC Transfer methods to prevent potential issues.


248-253: Check for potential performance implications with the new IBC Transfer methods.

Verification successful

Given the absence of direct references to performance issues in the client/chain/chain.go file, we cannot conclusively determine the performance implications of the new IBC Transfer methods from the search results alone. To further investigate, we should analyze the complexity of these methods based on their signatures and check for any related documentation or comments elsewhere in the codebase.


---

<!--Monologue:
[task item_1/1] Analyze the provided code and comments for potential performance implications of the new IBC Transfer methods.
[observations] The output from the script shows the implementation of the new IBC Transfer methods. Each method constructs a request object and then calls a common execution function, `common.ExecuteCall`, passing the context, a network-specific assistant, and the appropriate query client method.
[decomposition] The task involves analyzing the method implementations to identify any obvious performance concerns:
1. Review the structure and calls within each method.
2. Consider the implications of using `common.ExecuteCall` in terms of performance.
[analysis] The methods themselves are straightforward, constructing request objects and delegating the actual query execution to `common.ExecuteCall`. This pattern suggests that the performance of these methods heavily depends on the implementation of `common.ExecuteCall` and the underlying network operations. There are no complex computations or loops within the methods themselves that would directly cause performance issues.
[actions] Conclude the verification process by summarizing the findings and providing a recommendation based on the analysis.
-->

The analysis of the new IBC Transfer methods in the `client/chain/chain.go` file reveals that each method primarily involves constructing a request object and delegating the execution to a common function, `common.ExecuteCall`. This pattern suggests that the performance of these methods is largely dependent on the implementation of `common.ExecuteCall` and the underlying network interactions, rather than the methods themselves.

Since there are no complex computations or loops within these methods that could inherently cause performance issues, any potential performance implications would likely stem from the network layer or the `common.ExecuteCall` function. As such, further investigation into the performance of `common.ExecuteCall` and the network operations would be necessary to fully assess any performance concerns.



</details>

<details>
<summary>Scripts Executed</summary>

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:



---

Script:
```shell
#!/bin/bash
# Analyze method complexity and potential performance bottlenecks.
rg --type go --context 5 "performance" client/chain/chain.go

Length of output: 60



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for detailed comments or documentation related to the new IBC Transfer methods
rg --type go -C 10 "FetchDenomTrace|FetchDenomTraces|FetchDenomHash|FetchEscrowAddress|FetchTotalEscrowForDenom" client/chain/chain.go

Length of output: 3620


Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 31

Comment on lines +248 to +253
// IBC Transfer module
FetchDenomTrace(ctx context.Context, hash string) (*ibctransfertypes.QueryDenomTraceResponse, error)
FetchDenomTraces(ctx context.Context, pagination *query.PageRequest) (*ibctransfertypes.QueryDenomTracesResponse, error)
FetchDenomHash(ctx context.Context, trace string) (*ibctransfertypes.QueryDenomHashResponse, error)
FetchEscrowAddress(ctx context.Context, portId string, channelId string) (*ibctransfertypes.QueryEscrowAddressResponse, error)
FetchTotalEscrowForDenom(ctx context.Context, denom string) (*ibctransfertypes.QueryTotalEscrowForDenomResponse, error)
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Tip

Codebase Verification

The output from the script provides the implementation details for the new IBC Transfer methods in the chain.go file. Each method constructs a request, executes it using common.ExecuteCall, and returns the response along with any error that might have occurred during the call. Notably, the error handling in these methods does not use errors.Wrap or errors.Wrapf to add additional context to the errors before returning them. This is a deviation from the error handling pattern observed in other parts of the chain.go file, where errors.Wrap and errors.Wrapf are frequently used to enhance error messages.

Given this information, it appears that the new IBC Transfer methods do not follow the established pattern of error handling seen in the rest of the file. This could potentially lead to less informative error messages, which might hinder debugging and maintenance efforts.

Based on the findings, the review comment about ensuring proper error handling and context propagation in the new IBC Transfer methods is justified. The methods should ideally incorporate errors.Wrap or errors.Wrapf to maintain consistency with the rest of the file and to improve the clarity and traceability of errors.

Analysis chain

Ensure proper error handling and context propagation in new IBC Transfer methods.


The output from the executed script shows several instances of error handling using errors.Wrap and errors.Wrapf in the chain.go file. These instances are used to add additional context to errors before they are returned, which is a common practice for improving error traceability and debugging in Go.

From the output, it's evident that the existing methods in chain.go consistently use errors.Wrap or errors.Wrapf for error handling. This pattern enriches the error messages with more context, which can be very helpful during debugging and logging.

However, the script output does not directly show the error handling within the newly added IBC Transfer methods. To fully verify the review comment regarding proper error handling and context propagation in these new methods, we would need to inspect the implementation of these methods specifically.

Since the script focused on general usage of errors.Wrap and errors.Wrapf in the file and did not isolate the new methods, I will need to run a more targeted script to examine the error handling within the new IBC Transfer methods specifically.

Scripts Executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Verify that error handling is consistent with other methods in the same file.
rg --type go --context 5 "errors.Wrap" client/chain/chain.go

Length of output: 5524



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Extract the implementation of the new IBC Transfer methods to verify error handling
rg --type go --context 10 "FetchDenomTrace|FetchDenomTraces|FetchDenomHash|FetchEscrowAddress|FetchTotalEscrowForDenom" client/chain/chain.go

Length of output: 3627

Comment on lines +20 to +22
if err != nil {
panic(err)
}
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Consider handling the error from rpchttp.New more gracefully instead of using panic. This could improve the robustness of the example, especially in educational or demonstration settings.

- panic(err)
+ fmt.Println("Failed to create Tendermint HTTP client:", err)
+ return

Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.

Suggested change
if err != nil {
panic(err)
}
if err != nil {
fmt.Println("Failed to create Tendermint HTTP client:", err)
return
}

Comment on lines +34 to +36
if err != nil {
panic(err)
}
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Replace panic with a more graceful error handling approach in the InitCosmosKeyring error check. This will make the example more robust and user-friendly.

- panic(err)
+ fmt.Println("Error initializing Cosmos keyring:", err)
+ return

Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.

Suggested change
if err != nil {
panic(err)
}
if err != nil {
fmt.Println("Error initializing Cosmos keyring:", err)
return
}

Comment on lines +44 to +46
if err != nil {
panic(err)
}
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Use a more graceful error handling strategy instead of panic when an error occurs in NewClientContext. This enhances the example's usability and error reporting.

- panic(err)
+ fmt.Println("Error creating client context:", err)
+ return

Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.

Suggested change
if err != nil {
panic(err)
}
if err != nil {
fmt.Println("Error creating client context:", err)
return
}

Comment on lines +56 to +58
if err != nil {
panic(err)
}
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Avoid using panic for handling errors returned from NewChainClient. Consider logging the error and returning from the function to improve error management.

- panic(err)
+ fmt.Println("Error creating chain client:", err)
+ return

Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.

Suggested change
if err != nil {
panic(err)
}
if err != nil {
fmt.Println("Error creating chain client:", err)
return
}

Comment on lines +20 to +22
tmClient, err := rpchttp.New(network.TmEndpoint, "/websocket")
if err != nil {
panic(err)
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

As in the previous files, consider handling errors from rpchttp.New more gracefully instead of using panic. This could improve the robustness of the example.

- panic(err)
+ fmt.Println("Failed to create Tendermint HTTP client:", err)
+ return

Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.

Suggested change
tmClient, err := rpchttp.New(network.TmEndpoint, "/websocket")
if err != nil {
panic(err)
tmClient, err := rpchttp.New(network.TmEndpoint, "/websocket")
if err != nil {
fmt.Println("Failed to create Tendermint HTTP client:", err)
return

Comment on lines +34 to +36

if err != nil {
panic(err)
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Replace panic with a more graceful error handling approach in the InitCosmosKeyring error check. This will make the example more robust and user-friendly.

- panic(err)
+ fmt.Println("Error initializing Cosmos keyring:", err)
+ return

Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.

Suggested change
if err != nil {
panic(err)
if err != nil {
fmt.Println("Error initializing Cosmos keyring:", err)
return

Comment on lines +45 to +47
if err != nil {
panic(err)
}
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Use a more graceful error handling strategy instead of panic when an error occurs in NewClientContext. This enhances the example's usability and error reporting.

- panic(err)
+ fmt.Println("Error creating client context:", err)
+ return

Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.

Suggested change
if err != nil {
panic(err)
}
if err != nil {
fmt.Println("Error creating client context:", err)
return
}

Comment on lines +56 to +58
if err != nil {
panic(err)
}
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Avoid using panic for handling errors returned from NewChainClient. Consider logging the error and returning from the function to improve error management.

- panic(err)
+ fmt.Println("Error creating chain client:", err)
+ return

Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.

Suggested change
if err != nil {
panic(err)
}
if err != nil {
fmt.Println("Error creating chain client:", err)
return
}

Comment on lines +81 to +83
if err != nil {
panic(err)
}
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The error from AsyncBroadcastMsg is being printed but not handled further. Consider adding error handling logic, such as retrying the request or terminating the program if necessary.

if err != nil {
+   fmt.Println("Failed to broadcast IBC transfer message:", err)
+   return
-   panic(err)
}

Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.

Suggested change
if err != nil {
panic(err)
}
if err != nil {
fmt.Println("Failed to broadcast IBC transfer message:", err)
return
}

@aarmoa aarmoa merged commit ac5aaab into dev Apr 12, 2024
4 checks passed
@aarmoa aarmoa deleted the feat/add_ibc_transfer_support branch April 12, 2024 13:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants