-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 43
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Release/v1.52.0 #242
Release/v1.52.0 #242
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes introduce an Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 4
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
examples/chain/ofac/1_DownloadOfacList/example.go (1)
9-11
: Consider handling the error gracefully.Panicking on error is not the best practice for a production-grade application. Instead of panicking, consider handling the error gracefully. For example:
err := chainclient.DownloadOfacList() if err != nil { log.Printf("Failed to download OFAC list: %v", err) return }client/metadata/ofac.json (1)
4-5
: Clean up the duplicate Ethereum addresses.There are a few duplicate Ethereum addresses in the list:
0x19aa5fe80d33a56d56c78e82ea5e50e5d80b4dff
appears on lines 4 and 5.0x2f389ce8bd8ff92de3402ffce4691d17fc4f6535
appears on lines 7 and 8.0x4f47bc496083c727c5fbe3ce9cdf2b0f6496270c
appears on lines 14, 15, and 16.0xb6f5ec1a0a9cd1526536d3f0426c429529471f40
appears on lines 33, 34, and 35.While the presence of duplicates does not affect the functionality, it's recommended to clean them up for better maintainability.
Apply this diff to remove the duplicate addresses:
- "0x19aa5fe80d33a56d56c78e82ea5e50e5d80b4dff", "0x1da5821544e25c636c1417ba96ade4cf6d2f9b5a", - "0x2f389ce8bd8ff92de3402ffce4691d17fc4f6535", "0x2f50508a8a3d323b91336fa3ea6ae50e55f32185", "0x308ed4b7b49797e1a98d3818bff6fe5385410370", "0x3cbded43efdaf0fc77b9c55f6fc9988fcc9b757d", "0x3efa30704d2b8bbac821307230376556cf8cc39e", "0x48549a34ae37b12f6a30566245176994e17c6b4a", - "0x4f47bc496083c727c5fbe3ce9cdf2b0f6496270c", - "0x4f47bc496083c727c5fbe3ce9cdf2b0f6496270c", "0x530a64c0ce595026a4a556b703644228179e2d57", "0x5512d943ed1f7c8a43f3435c85f7ab68b30121b0", "0x5a7a51bfb49f190e5a6060a5bc6052ac14a3b59f", "0x5f48c2a71b2cc96e3f0ccae4e39318ff0dc375b2", "0x6be0ae71e6c41f2f9d0d1a3b8d0f75e6f6a0b46e", "0x6f1ca141a28907f78ebaa64fb83a9088b02a8352", "0x746aebc06d2ae31b71ac51429a19d54e797878e9", "0x77777feddddffc19ff86db637967013e6c6a116c", "0x797d7ae72ebddcdea2a346c1834e04d1f8df102b", "0x8576acc5c05d6ce88f4e49bf65bdf0c62f91353c", "0x901bb9583b24d97e995513c6778dc6888ab6870e", "0x961c5be54a2ffc17cf4cb021d863c42dacd47fc1", "0x97b1043abd9e6fc31681635166d430a458d14f9c", "0x9c2bc757b66f24d60f016b6237f8cdd414a879fa", "0x9f4cda013e354b8fc285bf4b9a60460cee7f7ea9", "0xa7e5d5a720f06526557c513402f2e6b5fa20b008", - "0xb6f5ec1a0a9cd1526536d3f0426c429529471f40", - "0xb6f5ec1a0a9cd1526536d3f0426c429529471f40", "0xc455f7fd3e0e12afd51fba5c106909934d8a0e4a", "0xca0840578f57fe71599d29375e16783424023357", "0xd0975b32cea532eadddfc9c60481976e39db3472", "0xd882cfc20f52f2599d84b8e8d58c7fb62cfe344b", - "0xd882cfc20f52f2599d84b8e8d58c7fb62cfe344b", "0xe1d865c3d669dcc8c57c8d023140cb204e672ee4", "0xe7aa314c77f4233c18c6cc84384a9247c0cf367b", "0xed6e0a7e4ac94d976eebfb82ccf777a3c6bad921", "0xf3701f445b6bdafedbca97d1e477357839e4120d", "0xfac583c0cf07ea434052c49115a4682172ab6b4f", "0xfec8a60023265364d066a1212fde3930f6ae8da7", "0xffbac21a641dcfe4552920138d90f3638b3c9fba"Also applies to: 7-8, 14-16, 33-35
Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (5)
- client/chain/chain.go (5 hunks)
- client/chain/chain_test.go (2 hunks)
- client/chain/ofac.go (1 hunks)
- client/metadata/ofac.json (1 hunks)
- examples/chain/ofac/1_DownloadOfacList/example.go (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (9)
examples/chain/ofac/1_DownloadOfacList/example.go (1)
1-12
: LGTM!The code provides a clear and concise example of how to use the new
DownloadOfacList
function from thechainclient
package to download the OFAC list.client/chain/ofac.go (4)
27-40
: LGTM!The function correctly initializes the
OfacChecker
by ensuring the OFAC list is available locally and loaded into memory. It handles errors appropriately.
50-76
: LGTM!The function correctly downloads the OFAC list from the specified URL and saves it locally. It handles errors appropriately.
78-93
: LGTM!The method correctly loads the OFAC list from the local file into memory for efficient lookups. It handles errors appropriately.
95-97
: LGTM!The method provides a simple and efficient way to check if an address is blacklisted by leveraging the map data structure for fast lookups.
client/metadata/ofac.json (1)
1-48
: LGTM! The file structure and content are valid.The
client/metadata/ofac.json
file contains a valid JSON array of Ethereum addresses. This file serves as a reference for the application to check against when determining whether a transaction or interaction involves an entity sanctioned by the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC).Ensure that this list is kept up to date with the latest OFAC regulations to maintain compliance.
client/chain/chain_test.go (1)
58-122
: LGTM!The
OfacTestSuite
is a well-structured test suite that thoroughly tests the OFAC list functionality. The setup and teardown methods effectively manage the test environment, and theTestOfacList
method correctly verifies the expected behavior when the OFAC list is present.The use of the
testify/suite
package enhances the organization and error handling of the tests.client/chain/chain.go (2)
324-325
: LGTM!The addition of the
ofacChecker
field to thechainClient
struct is a valid change. It enables the client to perform OFAC compliance checks.
445-458
: LGTM!The code segment correctly initializes the
OfacChecker
and performs the OFAC compliance check during client initialization. If the account's address is blacklisted, the client initialization fails with an appropriate error message.
func getOfacListPath() string { | ||
currentDirectory, _ := os.Getwd() | ||
for !strings.HasSuffix(currentDirectory, "sdk-go") { | ||
currentDirectory = filepath.Dir(currentDirectory) | ||
} | ||
return filepath.Join(filepath.Join(filepath.Join(currentDirectory, "client"), "metadata"), ofacListFilename) | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Consider improving the OFAC list path determination.
The current implementation assumes a specific directory structure and may break if the structure changes. It also doesn't handle the case where the "sdk-go" directory is not found.
Consider the following improvements:
- Use a configuration file or environment variable to specify the OFAC list path instead of relying on a specific directory structure. This would make the code more flexible and easier to maintain.
- Handle the case where the "sdk-go" directory is not found by returning an error or using a default path. This would make the code more robust and prevent potential issues.
if c.ofacChecker.IsBlacklisted(granter) { | ||
panic("Address is in the OFAC list") // panics should generally be avoided, but otherwise function signature should be changed | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Consider returning an error instead of panicking.
The OFAC compliance check on the granter
address is correctly performed. However, as mentioned in the previous comments, using panic
is generally discouraged. It would be better to return an error instead of panicking to allow proper error handling.
Apply this diff to return an error instead of panicking:
- if c.ofacChecker.IsBlacklisted(granter) {
- panic("Address is in the OFAC list") // panics should generally be avoided, but otherwise function signature should be changed
- }
+ if c.ofacChecker.IsBlacklisted(granter) {
+ return nil, errors.New("granter address is in the OFAC list")
+ }
Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
if c.ofacChecker.IsBlacklisted(granter) { | |
panic("Address is in the OFAC list") // panics should generally be avoided, but otherwise function signature should be changed | |
} | |
if c.ofacChecker.IsBlacklisted(granter) { | |
return nil, errors.New("granter address is in the OFAC list") | |
} |
if c.ofacChecker.IsBlacklisted(granter) { | ||
panic("Address is in the OFAC list") // panics should generally be avoided, but otherwise function signature should be changed | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Consider returning an error instead of panicking.
The OFAC compliance check on the granter
address is correctly performed. However, as mentioned in the previous comment, using panic
is generally discouraged. It would be better to return an error instead of panicking to allow proper error handling.
Apply this diff to return an error instead of panicking:
- if c.ofacChecker.IsBlacklisted(granter) {
- panic("Address is in the OFAC list") // panics should generally be avoided, but otherwise function signature should be changed
- }
+ if c.ofacChecker.IsBlacklisted(granter) {
+ return nil, errors.New("granter address is in the OFAC list")
+ }
Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
if c.ofacChecker.IsBlacklisted(granter) { | |
panic("Address is in the OFAC list") // panics should generally be avoided, but otherwise function signature should be changed | |
} | |
if c.ofacChecker.IsBlacklisted(granter) { | |
return nil, errors.New("granter address is in the OFAC list") | |
} |
if c.ofacChecker.IsBlacklisted(granter) { | ||
panic("Address is in the OFAC list") // panics should generally be avoided, but otherwise function signature should be changed | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Consider returning an error instead of panicking.
The OFAC compliance check on the granter
address is correctly performed. However, using panic
is generally discouraged as it abruptly terminates the program. It would be better to return an error instead of panicking to allow proper error handling.
Apply this diff to return an error instead of panicking:
- if c.ofacChecker.IsBlacklisted(granter) {
- panic("Address is in the OFAC list") // panics should generally be avoided, but otherwise function signature should be changed
- }
+ if c.ofacChecker.IsBlacklisted(granter) {
+ return nil, errors.New("granter address is in the OFAC list")
+ }
Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
OfacChecker
for compliance checks against the OFAC blacklist.granter
addresses during authorization processes.Bug Fixes
Tests