Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

build on approx_log_evidence introduced in AbstractGPs 0.5.17 #145

Open
wants to merge 5 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

st--
Copy link
Member

@st-- st-- commented May 8, 2023

Deprecates the approx_lml defined in this package in favour of AbstractGPs.approx_log_evidence (see JuliaGaussianProcesses/AbstractGPs.jl#361).

Copy link
Member

@willtebbutt willtebbutt left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@st--
Copy link
Member Author

st-- commented May 9, 2023

hadn't looked so good to the CI 😅

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented May 9, 2023

Codecov Report

Patch coverage has no change and project coverage change: -93.01 ⚠️

Comparison is base (97675b1) 93.35% compared to head (3f9b152) 0.35%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #145       +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   93.35%   0.35%   -93.01%     
==========================================
  Files           4       5        +1     
  Lines         286     281        -5     
==========================================
- Hits          267       1      -266     
- Misses         19     280      +261     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/LaplaceApproximationModule.jl 0.00% <0.00%> (-96.92%) ⬇️
src/SparseVariationalApproximationModule.jl 0.00% <0.00%> (-90.25%) ⬇️
src/TestUtils.jl 0.00% <ø> (-94.12%) ⬇️

... and 2 files with indirect coverage changes

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

@st--
Copy link
Member Author

st-- commented May 9, 2023

@willtebbutt any idea what's going on with the Julia 1 tests? 🤔

@willtebbutt
Copy link
Member

Hmm it looks like something going wrong in ChainRules / Zygote, but I definitely couldn't tell you what 😬

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants