-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
build on approx_log_evidence
introduced in AbstractGPs 0.5.17
#145
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
hadn't looked so good to the CI 😅 |
Codecov ReportPatch coverage has no change and project coverage change:
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #145 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 93.35% 0.35% -93.01%
==========================================
Files 4 5 +1
Lines 286 281 -5
==========================================
- Hits 267 1 -266
- Misses 19 280 +261
☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
@willtebbutt any idea what's going on with the Julia 1 tests? 🤔 |
Hmm it looks like something going wrong in ChainRules / Zygote, but I definitely couldn't tell you what 😬 |
Deprecates the
approx_lml
defined in this package in favour ofAbstractGPs.approx_log_evidence
(see JuliaGaussianProcesses/AbstractGPs.jl#361).