-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 32
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Loosen tolerance on test #495
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Codecov ReportPatch and project coverage have no change.
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #495 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 94.25% 94.25%
=======================================
Files 52 52
Lines 1374 1374
=======================================
Hits 1295 1295
Misses 79 79 Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
@mjp98 if you could confirm that this seems to fix things on your end, I'll merge |
@test isapprox( | ||
kernelmatrix(k, x, y), kernelmatrix(k, collect(x), collect(y)); rtol=1e-6 | ||
) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is the non-standard rtol needed, in particular if we fix the seeds with StableRNGs? Maybe
@test isapprox( | |
kernelmatrix(k, x, y), kernelmatrix(k, collect(x), collect(y)); rtol=1e-6 | |
) | |
@test kernelmatrix(k, x, y) ≈ kernelmatrix(k, collect(x), collect(y)) |
would be sufficient?
Summary
Replaces an equality test with an approximate equality test to handle roundoff issues. Should resolve #494
Proposed changes
Loosen a test tolerance very slightly
What alternatives have you considered?
None
Breaking changes
None