Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add FreeBSD to TravisCI config #72

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Add FreeBSD to TravisCI config #72

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

jbeich
Copy link

@jbeich jbeich commented May 21, 2020

TravisCI supports FreeBSD nowadays. Let's see how well it works.

This is an alterantive to #66 in case you don't want to sign up the repo with CirrusCI or maintain two CI configs.

.travis.yml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@philshafer
Copy link

philshafer commented Nov 29, 2020 via email

@jbeich
Copy link
Author

jbeich commented Nov 29, 2020

Like this? I can't test on TravisCI anymore due to usage limits but see https://travis-ci.org/github/Juniper/libxo/builds/746617293

@philshafer
Copy link

philshafer commented Nov 29, 2020 via email

@jbeich
Copy link
Author

jbeich commented Nov 29, 2020

If you'd like to switch to GitHub Actions in future, see actions/runner#385 (comment)

@jbeich
Copy link
Author

jbeich commented Nov 29, 2020

“../configure" fails, but we can’t see the “config.log” output file.

It doesn't fail anymore. I've updated the above comment to point to a more recent build. No clue why CI status doesn't propagate to this PR: maybe you need to re-install TravisCI from marketplace.

See also https://travis-ci.community/t/github-status-not-posted-on-commits-on-repositories-using-legacy-service-integration/7798

@philshafer philshafer deleted the branch Juniper:master June 9, 2023 05:15
@philshafer philshafer closed this Jun 9, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants