Onion_Omega2S 3D .step and .wrl models

[chmorgan]

Generated from kicad stepup tools from FreeCAD 0.19.

Lazar Demin [email protected], CTO of Onion, has personally and explicitly granted the author of this commit,
Chris Morgan [email protected], permission to add this model to KiCad for public usage.

Replace this line with your commit message! Please provide a description of your pull request

---

Thanks for creating a pull request to contribute to the KiCad libraries! To speed up integration of your PR, please check the following items as you complete them:

• A screenshot of the model(s) aligned with KiCad footprints is very useful
• Was the 3D model(s) created in a mechanical modelling program?
• Source files (or scripts) have been contributed
• Step model submitted in 1:1 scale
• WRL model submitted in 1:2.54 scale
• 3D model alignment checked against KiCad footprint
• WRL model uses correct material properties
• Geometry check performed against mechanical models

[claassistantio]

All committers have signed the CLA.

[chmorgan]

[chmorgan]

I believe this model and the corresponding PR in the source repo, KiCad/kicad-packages3D-source#263 meet the KLC requirements.

[chmorgan]

@Misca1234 it looks like you are active in this and the kicad-packages3D-source repositories, apologies for bugging you if you aren't the right person. I'm trying to find out who/when this and the source PRs might be reviewed.

[poeschlr]

Your contribution will be reviewed when it will be reviewed. Everyone here is a volunteer and you might notive by looking around that we have > 500 pull requests to deal with spread out over multiple repos.

[chmorgan]

@poeschlr I can appreciate that. Anything I can do to help move this forward?

[poeschlr]

Just review stuff. Compare footprints, symbols or 3d models against datasheets and show your findings for the maintainers.

[chmorgan]

Hi @poeschlr. I've reviewed a handful of open PRs and provided feedback. I can continue reviewing them but wanted to wait until those were through the process (merged or closed) before reviewing more of them. What are the next steps?

[poeschlr]

I did not mean to imply that i will take time out of my day to review your stuff if you review pull request. You asked how you can help and i gave you an answer. So in the end this means you will need to be patient.
We are simply not enough volunteers and the ones that are here do not have the time available they would love to have. I for example have a full time job, need to finish my thesis and then need to balance my family live and time to meet my friends with my hobbies like working on KiCad. (And even my time on KiCad is split between developing the footprint generator scripts, reviews of library contributions, writing tutorials and helping out on the forum.)

[chmorgan]

@poeschlr I appreciate that, I was more asking about the process and who else was involved. Are there other reviewers / committers that I might be able to work with?

[poeschlr]

We don't have a strict rule who does what. Every maintainer does what they have time for or are interested in. I mostly work on the footprint and scripting side of things. I really mostly answered above because i generally also answer things like "i am inpatient please do my stuff first" (mostly by telling the user in question to be patient as i did here)