dont need to flush fillets on transform

[jessfraz]

cleaning up the hack since #5880 is fixed

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name	Status	Preview	Comments	Updated (UTC)
modeling-app	✅ Ready (Inspect)	Visit Preview	💬 Add feedback	May 24, 2025 1:36am

[jessfraz]

hmm a test fails now so i guess we cant, not a huge deal but @benjamaan476 might find curious its scale_after_fillet

[jessfraz]

but i know @benjamaan476 would rather i just remove all this delayed fillet nonsense insteaad ahhaha

[codspeed-hq]

CodSpeed Instrumentation Performance Report

Merging #7204 will not alter performance

_{Comparing do-not-flush-fillets-transform (df8ef79) with main (eb23278)}

Summary

✅ 79 untouched benchmarks
🆕 1 new benchmarks
⁉️ 1 dropped benchmarks

⚠️ Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.

Benchmarks breakdown

	Benchmark	BASE	HEAD	Change
⁉️	parse_80-20-rail	56.4 ms	N/A	N/A
🆕	parse_t-slot-rail	N/A	14.2 ms	N/A

[benjamaan476]

Could this become just executing the fillets when they appear in the kcl instead? I can't remember why they need to be delayed until later, but they might not need to be anymore?

[jessfraz]

yeah 100% @benjamaan476 i knew you'd say that
stuff like this is why we save til the end #6954