Config: Alfajores

[fabianschu]

Description

Please include a summary of the change and if relevant which issue is fixed. Please also include relevant motivation and context.

Type of change

• Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
• Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
• Dependency changes
• Code refactor / cleanup
• Documentation or wording changes
• Other

How should this be tested?

Please provide instructions so we can test. Please also list any relevant details for your test configuration.

• Test A
• Test B

Checklist:

• I have performed a self-review of my own code
• I have requested at least 1 review (If the PR is significant enough, use best judgement here)
• I have commented my code where relevant, particularly in hard-to-understand areas

dev -> master

• I have checked that all beta deployments have synced
• I have checked that the earliest block in the polygon pruned deployment is block, date/time
  • The earliest block is more than 24 hours old
• I have checked that core metrics are the same in the beta and production deployments

Merges to dev

• I have checked that the graft base is not a pruned deployment

closes #2

[fabianschu]

This is a hacky solution, because the code is expecting a USDC address to be set.

[Another-DevX]

If you're referring to the CUSD address on Celo Alfajores, you entered an incorrect address. This is the actual address, and its original source.
CUSD Address ALFAJORES: 0x874069fa1eb16d44d622f2e0ca25eea172369bc1
https://docs.celo.org/es/token-addresses

[fabianschu]

The API for the deployed subgraph can be accessed here: https://api.studio.thegraph.com/query/10166/balancer-rfi/version/latest

[Another-DevX]

Pls change the CUSD address to the correct one, as the one you have points to an ERC20 called MyToken.

[fabianschu]

I deployed this "cUSD" contract to alfajores. It has an unprotected mint function so that we can use it to test stuff.

[fabianschu]

Merging this PR despite your request for changes, because using our "own" cUSD contract vs the "official" one is useful for us, because it simplifies testing a lot.