Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Periodic merge to master (release 3.1.5) #394

Merged
merged 98 commits into from
Apr 10, 2024
Merged

Periodic merge to master (release 3.1.5) #394

merged 98 commits into from
Apr 10, 2024

Conversation

rtapella
Copy link
Collaborator

@rtapella rtapella commented Apr 9, 2024

Release 3.1.5 of the workspaces is happening.
Use this timing to do a periodic merge from develop -> master and get docs related to the 3.1.5 release into production

Sumant Jha and others added 30 commits April 7, 2023 17:31
… started giving error at the end all of a sudden.
- also cleaned up some broken links in other pages
Copy link

Check out this pull request on  ReviewNB

See visual diffs & provide feedback on Jupyter Notebooks.


Powered by ReviewNB

Copy link
Contributor

@omshinde omshinde left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks. The PR looks good to me. Zenodo DOI is also added. I didn't check individual notebooks as they must have been reviewed and approved during development.

@wildintellect
Copy link
Collaborator

@omshinde a key check at this stage is to check the website build to make sure nothing obvious is broken https://docs.maap-project.org/en/develop/

Copy link
Contributor

@grallewellyn grallewellyn left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Reviewed and

  • images and links look good
  • most tutorials look good

Pending issues:

  • interval_color_mapping tutorial items_response returns not found
  • we should change the stac_ipyleaflet tutorial to remove # %pip install git+https://github.com/MAAP-Project/stac_ipyleaflet.git#egg-info=stac_ipyleaflet because all images now include stac_ipyleaflet. The tutorial works with removing this line
  • one of the images are blurry and I created a PR to fix it here: Fix blurry image #395

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

For this tutorial, items_response = requests.get(f"{stac_endpoint}/collections/{collection}/items/{item}").json()
Returns {'code': 'NotFoundError', 'description': 'Collection NASA_JPL_global_agb_mean_2020 does not exist.'}

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

oh that product was removed from MAAP, we'll need to change to a different product. Please make a ticket. at the same time we can also upgrade the document to use pystac client instead of direct requests

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

is this an issue with the updated content in develop? is this a blocker on merging the PR, or is this a new issue that will go into a future push?

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No these issue would have existed regardless and should not block but be their own tickets for next round of fixes.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Created issue here: #396

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@rtapella
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Seems like this is ready to push.

@rtapella
Copy link
Collaborator Author

resolves #278

@rtapella rtapella merged commit 3416052 into master Apr 10, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants