You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on May 3, 2024. It is now read-only.
Hello,
When I run collapse_isoforms_by_sam.py with a big .sam file (~90GB), it ran quite slowly and always ended with an error 'OUT_OF_ME+ 0:125'. Are there any way I can optimize the project?
The codes're as follows:
python collapse_isoforms_by_sam.py --input isoseq_flnc.Transcript.fastq --fq -s isoseq_flnc.Transcript.sorted.sam -o TEST
Besides, I've read the example data, and I don't understand why PB4.2 contains two isoforms without containing PB4.3 as all these three belong to the same genomic region? The same problems for 1.1, 1.2 and 1.3. How the project define if the two reads belong to a same loci.index?
Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Hello,
When I run collapse_isoforms_by_sam.py with a big .sam file (~90GB), it ran quite slowly and always ended with an error 'OUT_OF_ME+ 0:125'. Are there any way I can optimize the project?
The codes're as follows:
python collapse_isoforms_by_sam.py --input isoseq_flnc.Transcript.fastq --fq -s isoseq_flnc.Transcript.sorted.sam -o TEST
Besides, I've read the example data, and I don't understand why PB4.2 contains two isoforms without containing PB4.3 as all these three belong to the same genomic region? The same problems for 1.1, 1.2 and 1.3. How the project define if the two reads belong to a same loci.index?
Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: