Skip to content

Malaeu/aorsf-bench

 
 

Repository files navigation

aorsf-bench

The goal of aorsf-bench is to introduce and evaluate

  1. a method to increase the computational efficiency of (i.e., accelerate) the oblique random survival forest (RSF)
  2. a method to estimate importance of individual predictor variables with the oblique RSF.

The entire project is summarized in a paper: paper/arxix/main.pdf.

tl;dr

  • We made oblique RSFs faster and also developed a new method to estimate importance of individual predictors with them. These methods are available in the aorsf R package.

  • We find that the accelerated oblique RSF (aorsf-fast in the paper) is fast and accurate. In a benchmark with 35 different risk prediction tasks, aorsf-fast was faster than all of the learners we analyzed except for penalized Cox regression models (glmnet-cox in the paper). Figure: Distribution of time taken to fit a prediction model and compute predicted risk. The median time, in seconds, is printed and annotated for each learner by a vertical line.

  • We find that aorsf-fast has the best index of prediction accuracy out of all the learners we evaluated. Figure: Expected differences in index of prediction accuracy between the accelerated oblique random survival forest and other learning algorithms. A region of practical equivalence is shown by purple dotted lines, and a boundary of non-zero difference is shown by an orange dotted line at the origin.

  • We find that negation variable importance improves the chances of ranking a relevant variable as more important than an irrelevant variable when using an oblique RSF to estimate variable importance. Figure: Concordance statistic for assigning higher importance to relevant versus irrelevant variables. Text appears in rows where negation importance obtained the highest concordance, showing absolute and percent improvement over the second best technique.

Reproducing this paper

We use targets to coordinate our numerical experiments. Thus, our results on publicly available data can be reproduced by cloning our repo and running tar_make() with only publicly available data requested in the targets pipeline. Below are the steps involved:

  1. Clone our repo and open the associated Rstudio project.

  2. Open packages.R and ensure you have installed the R packages listed in this file.

  3. In _targets.R, edit the vector of datasets passed into our targets pipeline so that it only contains publicly available data. Below is a code chunk showing which datasets you need to comment out to request only the publicly available ones:

data_source = c(
  "veteran",
  "colon_recur",
  "colon_acm",
  "pbc_orsf",
  "time_to_million",
  "gbsg2",
  "peakV02",
  "flchain",
  "nafld",
  "rotterdam_recur",
  "rotterdam_acm",
  "actg_aids",
  "actg_death",
  # "guide_it_cvd",    
  # "guide_it_hfhosp", 
  "breast",
  # "sprint_cvd",
  # "sprint_acm",
  "nki",
  "lung",
  "lung_ncctg",
  "follic_death",
  "follic_relapse",
  "mgus2_death",
  "mgus2_pcm"
  # "mesa_hf",
  # "mesa_chd",
  # "mesa_stroke",
  # "mesa_death",
  # "aric_hf",
  # "aric_chd",
  # "aric_stroke",
  # "aric_death",
  # "jhs_stroke",
  # "jhs_chd"
)
  1. Create the nafld data by running nafld_build(), which is an R function included in R/nafld_build.R that combines multiple datasets in the survival package into a dataset we analyzed in the current study. An example of how this can be done is below:

  2. Run targets::tar_make() to make the targets pipeline, but be aware that it will take a very long time to make the pipeline as-is.

To make the process run quickly, I recommend setting run_seed to be 1:3 in _targets.R to request only 3 replications of Monte-Carlo cross validation be completed. Also in _targets.R, use a subset of the faster learners by commenting out the slower ones:

# slower model fitters are commented out

model_fitters <- c(
  'aorsf_fast',
  'aorsf_cph',
  # 'aorsf_random',
  # 'aorsf_net',
  # 'rotsf',
  # 'rsfse',
  # 'cif',
  'cox_net',
  # 'coxtime',
  # 'obliqueRSF',
  'xgb_cox',
  # 'xgb_aft',
  'randomForestSRC',
  'ranger'
)

About

benchmarking the aorsf package

Resources

Stars

Watchers

Forks

Releases

No releases published

Packages

No packages published

Languages

  • TeX 51.0%
  • HTML 37.1%
  • R 11.4%
  • CSS 0.5%