Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Refactor Quota Source method and spec #587

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 15, 2019

Conversation

GregP
Copy link
Contributor

@GregP GregP commented Oct 1, 2019

This PR is based on the issue below:
ManageIQ/manageiq#12038

@miq-bot add_label refactoring

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Oct 1, 2019

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 3719

  • 21 of 21 (100.0%) changed or added relevant lines in 1 file are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage increased (+0.02%) to 96.823%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 3705: 0.02%
Covered Lines: 2773
Relevant Lines: 2864

💛 - Coveralls

@GregP GregP force-pushed the refactor_quota_source branch 2 times, most recently from 1141ad3 to 2bab1d2 Compare October 14, 2019 21:55
Copy link
Member

@gmcculloug gmcculloug left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Had one comment to move the new method but otherwise looks good.

@handle = handle
end

def miq_request
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@GregP This method belongs in the private method section.

@GregP GregP force-pushed the refactor_quota_source branch from 2bab1d2 to cf13086 Compare October 15, 2019 16:18
@miq-bot
Copy link
Member

miq-bot commented Oct 15, 2019

Checked commit GregP@cf13086 with ruby 2.4.6, rubocop 0.69.0, haml-lint 0.20.0, and yamllint 1.10.0
2 files checked, 0 offenses detected
Everything looks fine. 👍

@tinaafitz tinaafitz merged commit f211288 into ManageIQ:master Oct 15, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants