Subclass Storages by provider #443
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This was referenced Dec 10, 2019
agrare
force-pushed
the
add_sti_to_storages
branch
from
fa99f7e to
0c01474
Compare
This was referenced Dec 10, 2019
Now that a Storage record belongs_to an EMS we can subclass the storages by provider.
agrare
force-pushed
the
add_sti_to_storages
branch
from
0c01474 to
6422ea5
Compare
|
Checked commit agrare@6422ea5 with ruby 2.5.5, rubocop 0.69.0, haml-lint 0.20.0, and yamllint 1.10.0 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Now that a Storage record belongs_to an EMS we can subclass the storages
by provider.
Cross Repo Tests: ManageIQ/manageiq-cross_repo-tests#35
ManageIQ/manageiq#19440