feat: upgrade transaction controller to get incoming transactions using accounts API

[matthewwalsh0]

Description

Update @metamask/transaction-controller to retrieve incoming transactions using the accounts API rather than Etherscan.

Add incoming transaction E2E tests.

Related issues

Manual testing steps

Screenshots/Recordings

Before

After

Pre-merge author checklist

• I’ve followed MetaMask Contributor Docs and MetaMask Mobile Coding Standards.
• I've completed the PR template to the best of my ability
• I’ve included tests if applicable
• I’ve documented my code using JSDoc format if applicable
• I’ve applied the right labels on the PR (see labeling guidelines). Not required for external contributors.

Pre-merge reviewer checklist

• I've manually tested the PR (e.g. pull and build branch, run the app, test code being changed).
• I confirm that this PR addresses all acceptance criteria described in the ticket it closes and includes the necessary testing evidence such as recordings and or screenshots.

[github-actions]

Bitrise

❌❌❌ pr_smoke_e2e_pipeline failed on Bitrise! ❌❌❌

Commit hash: 6e7d2e0
Build link: https://app.bitrise.io/app/be69d4368ee7e86d/pipelines/1208d4a6-755a-4635-8bec-b9c98d027cfb

Note

• You can kick off another pr_smoke_e2e_pipeline on Bitrise by removing and re-applying the Run Smoke E2E label on the pull request

Tip

• Check the documentation if you have any doubts on how to understand the failure on bitrise

[github-actions]

Bitrise

❌❌❌ pr_smoke_e2e_pipeline failed on Bitrise! ❌❌❌

Commit hash: 77e1f90
Build link: https://app.bitrise.io/app/be69d4368ee7e86d/pipelines/b2a7b07a-a6b0-481e-b8a4-686655daf678

Note

• You can kick off another pr_smoke_e2e_pipeline on Bitrise by removing and re-applying the Run Smoke E2E label on the pull request

Tip

• Check the documentation if you have any doubts on how to understand the failure on bitrise

[github-actions]

Bitrise

❌❌❌ pr_smoke_e2e_pipeline failed on Bitrise! ❌❌❌

Commit hash: 3d85274
Build link: https://app.bitrise.io/app/be69d4368ee7e86d/pipelines/a20547db-b13e-4a79-9152-732b3dd43739

Note

• You can kick off another pr_smoke_e2e_pipeline on Bitrise by removing and re-applying the Run Smoke E2E label on the pull request

Tip

• Check the documentation if you have any doubts on how to understand the failure on bitrise

[github-actions]

Bitrise

❌❌❌ pr_smoke_e2e_pipeline failed on Bitrise! ❌❌❌

Commit hash: 15501d1
Build link: https://app.bitrise.io/app/be69d4368ee7e86d/pipelines/2999244d-fd32-4f37-ab4b-b3ef00dd347b

Note

• You can kick off another pr_smoke_e2e_pipeline on Bitrise by removing and re-applying the Run Smoke E2E label on the pull request

Tip

• Check the documentation if you have any doubts on how to understand the failure on bitrise

[github-actions]

Bitrise

❌❌❌ pr_smoke_e2e_pipeline failed on Bitrise! ❌❌❌

Commit hash: 5e79585
Build link: https://app.bitrise.io/app/be69d4368ee7e86d/pipelines/6cd7755b-d265-48d1-abc2-244249859569

Note

• You can kick off another pr_smoke_e2e_pipeline on Bitrise by removing and re-applying the Run Smoke E2E label on the pull request

Tip

• Check the documentation if you have any doubts on how to understand the failure on bitrise

[sonarcloud]

Quality Gate failed

Failed conditions
34.2% Coverage on New Code (required ≥ 60%)

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud