Skip to content

Clarify example of IsTargetFrameworkCompatible #10954

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 23, 2025

Conversation

MattKotsenas
Copy link
Contributor

The examples for IsTargetFrameworkCompatible give two examples of incompatible TFMs, but don't give any examples of compatible TFMs, so it isn't super clear how to use the API. Added a "Value8" example that shows that net6.0 is compatible with net8.0.

The examples for IsTargetFrameworkCompatible give two examples of incompatible TFMs, but don't give any examples of compatible TFMs, so it isn't super clear how to use the API. Added a "Value8" example that shows that `net6.0` is compatible with `net8.0`.
Copy link
Contributor

@MattKotsenas : Thanks for your contribution! The author(s) and reviewer(s) have been notified to review your proposed change.

@MattKotsenas
Copy link
Contributor Author

@ghogen , would you mind taking a look here? If you have any questions or concerns, please let me know. Thanks!

Copy link
Contributor

Learn Build status updates of commit 7c64a38:

✅ Validation status: passed

File Status Preview URL Details
docs/msbuild/property-functions.md ✅Succeeded

For more details, please refer to the build report.

@v-regandowner
Copy link
Contributor

@ghogen - Can you review the proposed changes?

IMPORTANT: When the changes are ready for publication, adding a #sign-off comment is the best way to signal that the PR is ready for the review team to merge.

#label:"aq-pr-triaged"
@MicrosoftDocs/public-repo-pr-review-team

@prmerger-automator prmerger-automator bot added the aq-pr-triaged tracking label for the PR review team label Jul 16, 2025
@ghogen ghogen merged commit 9225923 into MicrosoftDocs:main Jul 23, 2025
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants