Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Test isContract(address, chainId) #52

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 17, 2024
Merged

Test isContract(address, chainId) #52

merged 2 commits into from
Sep 17, 2024

Conversation

bh2smith
Copy link
Collaborator

@bh2smith bh2smith commented Sep 17, 2024

PR Type

Tests, Enhancement


Description

  • Updated the console log message in examples/send-tx.ts to provide clearer information on deployment status.
  • Reorganized import statements and reformatted functions in src/util.ts for better readability.
  • Added new test cases for the isContract function in tests/utils.spec.ts.

Changes walkthrough 📝

Relevant files
Enhancement
send-tx.ts
Update console log message for deployment status                 

examples/send-tx.ts

  • Updated console log message for deployment status.
+1/-1     
util.ts
Reorganize imports and reformat utility functions               

src/util.ts

  • Reorganized import statements.
  • Formatted packPaymasterData function.
  • Reformatted isContract function definition.
  • +10/-7   
    Tests
    utils.spec.ts
    Add test cases for isContract function                                     

    tests/utils.spec.ts

  • Added import for zeroAddress.
  • Added test cases for isContract function.
  • +10/-0   

    💡 PR-Agent usage:
    Comment /help on the PR to get a list of all available PR-Agent tools and their descriptions

    @mintbase-codium-pr-agent
    Copy link

    PR Reviewer Guide 🔍

    ⏱️ Estimated effort to review: 2 🔵🔵⚪⚪⚪
    🧪 PR contains tests
    🔒 No security concerns identified
    ⚡ No key issues to review

    @mintbase-codium-pr-agent
    Copy link

    PR Code Suggestions ✨

    CategorySuggestion                                                                                                                                    Score
    Security
    Add address validation in the isContract function to enhance security

    Ensure that the address parameter in isContract function is validated or sanitized
    to prevent potential security vulnerabilities, such as injection attacks.

    src/util.ts [41-43]

     export async function isContract(
       address: Address,
       chainId: number
     ): Promise<boolean> {
    +  if (!ethers.utils.isAddress(address)) throw new Error("Invalid address");
     
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 10

    Why: Adding validation for the address parameter is crucial for preventing potential security vulnerabilities. This suggestion significantly enhances the security of the function.

    10
    Best practice
    Use nullish coalescing for defaulting to avoid falsy value issues

    Consider using nullish coalescing (??) instead of logical OR (||) for default values
    to avoid unexpected falsy evaluations. This is particularly important for numeric
    values where 0 is a valid value but is falsy in JavaScript.

    src/util.ts [29-30]

    -toHex(BigInt(data.paymasterVerificationGasLimit || 0n), { size: 16 }),
    -toHex(BigInt(data.paymasterPostOpGasLimit || 0n), { size: 16 }),
    +toHex(BigInt(data.paymasterVerificationGasLimit ?? 0n), { size: 16 }),
    +toHex(BigInt(data.paymasterPostOpGasLimit ?? 0n), { size: 16 }),
     
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8

    Why: This suggestion improves the robustness of the code by ensuring that valid numeric values like 0 are not mistakenly replaced by default values. It addresses a potential bug and enhances code reliability.

    8
    Maintainability
    Refactor tests to use parameterized inputs for cleaner code

    Refactor the repeated isContract test cases into a single test with parameterized
    inputs to reduce redundancy and improve maintainability.

    tests/utils.spec.ts [73-76]

    -expect(isContract(zeroAddress, chainId)).toBe(false);
    -expect(
    -  isContract("0x9008D19f58AAbD9eD0D60971565AA8510560ab41", chainId)
    -).toBe(true);
    +const testCases = [
    +  { address: zeroAddress, expected: false },
    +  { address: "0x9008D19f58AAbD9eD0D60971565AA8510560ab41", expected: true }
    +];
    +testCases.forEach(({ address, expected }) =>
    +  expect(isContract(address, chainId)).toBe(expected)
    +);
     
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7

    Why: Refactoring the test cases to use parameterized inputs reduces redundancy and improves maintainability. This suggestion enhances the readability and maintainability of the test code.

    7
    Enhancement
    Use a structured logger for better log management

    Replace the generic console.log with a more structured logging approach, such as
    using a dedicated logger that can handle different levels and formats of logs.

    examples/send-tx.ts [22]

    -console.log("Safe Deployed:", deployed);
    +logger.info("Safe Deployed:", deployed);
     
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 6

    Why: While using a structured logger is a good practice for better log management and scalability, it is not critical for the functionality of the code. This suggestion improves code quality but is not essential.

    6

    @bh2smith bh2smith merged commit e39d0c3 into main Sep 17, 2024
    1 check passed
    @bh2smith bh2smith deleted the test/isContract branch September 17, 2024 08:19
    Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
    Projects
    None yet
    Development

    Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

    1 participant