-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 31
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Initial commit of marine letkf stubs #1090
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good-
logger = getLogger(__name__.split('.')[-1]) | ||
|
||
|
||
class MarineLETKF(Task): |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I know Analysis
task has a few (2) atmosphere specific methods, but the constructor for it sets up the window, etc. Also, there are generic methods to construct the JEDI yaml, copy observations, etc.
This class deviates from the framework that the other analysis tasks are developed around.
If there is a need to update Analysis
task to be further accommodating of ocean/seaice requirements, it would be better to discuss and develop rather than have to revisit when there is a crunch.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That's why we added you as a reviewer and that's what a PR is for @aerorahul, discuss.
Can you switch to using Analysis
as parent class @AndrewEichmann-NOAA ? Also, while re-reading your code, I saw a few places where you are using recentering
instead of letkf
.
Adds stubs and ctest for marine LETKF task. Co-dependent on global-workflow PR NOAA-EMC/global-workflow#2564
Addresses #1091