Separate regional plotting from chl_eval script and add config file to script #112
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR generalizes the chl_eval.py script to use the config file in
diagnostics/physics, and separates its regional plotting capabilities to a separate file that for the moment only applies to the Gulf of Mexico and Northeast US. This script can be generalized to any sub region at a later point in time.The script currently relies on the config file in
/diagnostics/physics, rather than creating it's own. Since this could lead to that config file becoming even more cluttered, do we want to maintaint this design?The following plots showoutput from the script across the NWA, NEP, and MHI. I currently do not have a
ocean_cobalt_omip_sfcpp file for the arctic domain, so it is not included in the following plots.