Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[JAX] Support Ring Attention (Context Parallelism) #1059

Draft
wants to merge 5 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

mingxu1067
Copy link
Collaborator

@mingxu1067 mingxu1067 commented Jul 30, 2024

Description

Please include a brief summary of the changes, relevant motivation and context.

  • Adding utils of sharding to retrieve the given mesh information.
  • Adding support for Ring Attention on top of Fused Attention.
  • Adding workload balance of causal masking utils.
  • Adding corresponding unit-tests.

Type of change

  • Documentation change (change only to the documentation, either a fix or a new content)
  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
  • Infra/Build change
  • Code refractor

Changes

Please list the changes introduced in this PR:

  • Adding utils of sharding to retrieve the given mesh information.
  • Adding FWD and BWD primitives of Ring Attention.
  • Adding a workload balance of causal masking function and its status tracker.
  • Adding corresponding unit-tests.

Checklist:

  • I have read and followed the contributing guidelines
  • The functionality is complete
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • My changes generate no new warnings
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes

@mingxu1067 mingxu1067 marked this pull request as draft July 30, 2024 17:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant