Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improve camera logic #188

Open
sibocw opened this issue Jun 17, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Improve camera logic #188

sibocw opened this issue Jun 17, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@sibocw
Copy link
Contributor

sibocw commented Jun 17, 2024

See #185, #187.

Specific issues:

  • Unclear what is_visualization_camera indicates
  • Unclear why neck_zoomin camera is treated differently from, eg. head or tarsus cameras
  • Checking if the camera is a camera defined in the XML (I think this is what it does?) by checking if the name contains "Animat" is a bad idea — in multi-fly simulations, cameras attached to different flies might have names that start with different strings because the flies might have different names.
  • Why does the camera have to be attached to a fly? Shouldn't this be optional in case of static cameras attached to the arena?

This is not urgent.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants