Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Uhh Git hell #27

Merged
merged 21 commits into from
Feb 23, 2024
Merged

Uhh Git hell #27

merged 21 commits into from
Feb 23, 2024

Conversation

ShreyanJain9
Copy link
Collaborator

why 😔😩

ShreyanJain9 and others added 17 commits February 15, 2024 18:40
* DIdPlc stuff (#21)

* remove .so file, upgrade rustler

* begin DidPlc

* started DidPlc classes (don't look please)

* closer to working did generation

* doctest for cbor encoding

* okay fine

* use to_bytes

* decode16

* add round trip cbor test

* fix map key syntax

* trying libipld for encoding dag-cbor

* missing cid tag

maybe?

* what if we construct a tagged IPLD node with the CID tag and insert it into the result map

* manually tag it? idk

* fortune favors the bold

* mission failed, we'll get 'em next time

* update README to reflect new goals :) (#23)

* fix example case in dagcbor docs (#24)

---------

Co-authored-by: flicknow <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: nova <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Samuel Newman <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: mark <[email protected]>
@ShreyanJain9 ShreyanJain9 requested a review from mekaem February 23, 2024 05:29
@mekaem
Copy link
Collaborator

mekaem commented Feb 23, 2024

not great

@ShreyanJain9
Copy link
Collaborator Author

works now i think

@mekaem
Copy link
Collaborator

mekaem commented Feb 23, 2024

it better

@mekaem mekaem merged commit ed5f982 into main Feb 23, 2024
1 check passed
@ShreyanJain9 ShreyanJain9 deleted the did-plc branch March 5, 2024 18:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants