-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Preserved EVM state relation #10
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
To be honest I was kind of surprised I didn't found it in mathlib. Perhaps that is not _idiomatic_ Lean solution?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
See comments
@@ -82,4 +82,48 @@ lemma evm_eq_symm_of_isPure_ok_ok {evm evm'} {vs vs'} (h : isPure (Ok evm vs) (O | |||
symm | |||
aesop_spec | |||
|
|||
def preservesEvm (s₀ : State) (s₁ : State) : Prop := |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think this predicate should also compare evm states in the case where the second state is a Checkpoint
no? 🙂
Clear/EVMState.lean
Outdated
rw [preserved_def] at h | ||
exact h.2.2.1 | ||
|
||
def mono_keccak_map {evm evm' : EVMState} (h : preserved evm evm') : |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is just a projection function, it's not a monotonicity statement. It says that you can take out the last component of and.
The thing that you will need at some point is stuff like: insert is monotonic in its second argument given the preorder on your maps, i.e.:
m1 <= m2 -> insert x m1 <= insert x m2.
No description provided.