-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Preserved EVM state relation #10
Open
jkopanski
wants to merge
7
commits into
main
Choose a base branch
from
preserved
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from 6 commits
Commits
Show all changes
7 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
fde3c73
Inter instance for binary relation
jkopanski 5b717c3
Preserved, relation for EVM state that mostly stays the same
jkopanski 0b98838
Add `keccak_map` to `preserved` relation
Coda-Coda ffb62e4
Some more lemmas about preserving EVM
jkopanski dd00c55
Remove Inter instance
jkopanski e57b139
Use order for the keccek map preserve relation
jkopanski 585e97d
Use a structure for Preserved relation
jkopanski File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -82,4 +82,62 @@ lemma evm_eq_symm_of_isPure_ok_ok {evm evm'} {vs vs'} (h : isPure (Ok evm vs) (O | |
symm | ||
aesop_spec | ||
|
||
def preservesEvm (s₀ : State) (s₁ : State) : Prop := | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I think this predicate should also compare evm states in the case where the second state is a |
||
match s₀, s₁ with | ||
| .Ok e₀ _, .Ok e₁ _ => preserved e₀ e₁ | ||
| _, _ => True | ||
|
||
lemma preservesEvm_of_isOk {s₀ s₁ : State} (s₀_ok : s₀.isOk) (s₁_ok : s₁.isOk) : | ||
preservesEvm s₀ s₁ → | ||
(s₀.evm.account_map = s₁.evm.account_map ∧ | ||
s₀.evm.hash_collision = s₁.evm.hash_collision ∧ | ||
s₀.evm.execution_env = s₁.evm.execution_env ∧ | ||
s₀.evm.keccak_map ≤ s₁.evm.keccak_map) := by | ||
unfold preservesEvm | ||
cases s₀ <;> cases s₁ <;> simp at * | ||
rw [preserved_def] | ||
intro _; assumption | ||
|
||
@[simp] | ||
lemma preservesEvm_rfl {s : State} : preservesEvm s s := by | ||
unfold preservesEvm | ||
cases s <;> simp | ||
|
||
lemma preservesEvm_trans {s₀ s₁ s₂} (h : s₁.isOk) : | ||
preservesEvm s₀ s₁ → preservesEvm s₁ s₂ → preservesEvm s₀ s₂ := by | ||
unfold preservesEvm | ||
cases s₀ <;> cases s₁ <;> cases s₂ <;> simp_all | ||
exact preserved_trans | ||
|
||
lemma preservesEvm_of_preserved (s₀ : State) (s₁ : State) : | ||
preserved s₀.evm s₁.evm → preservesEvm s₀ s₁ := by | ||
unfold preservesEvm | ||
cases s₀ <;> cases s₁ <;> simp | ||
simp [evm] | ||
|
||
lemma sload_eq_of_preservesEvm | ||
{s s' : State} {a : UInt256} (h : s.isOk) (h' : s'.isOk) (hss : preservesEvm s s') : | ||
s.evm.sload a = s'.evm.sload a := by | ||
unfold preservesEvm at hss | ||
unfold isOk at h h' | ||
cases s <;> cases s' <;> simp [evm] at * | ||
exact EVMState.sload_eq_of_preserved hss | ||
|
||
@[aesop safe norm (rule_sets := [Clear.aesop_spec])] | ||
lemma preservesEvm_of_insert {s₀ s₁} {var val} : | ||
preservesEvm (s₀⟦var ↦ val⟧) s₁ ↔ preservesEvm s₀ s₁ := by | ||
unfold preservesEvm | ||
cases s₀ <;> cases s₁ <;> simp | ||
unfold State.insert; simp | ||
unfold State.insert; simp | ||
|
||
@[aesop safe norm (rule_sets := [Clear.aesop_spec])] | ||
lemma preservesEvm_of_insert' {s₀ s₁} {var val} : | ||
preservesEvm s₀ (s₁⟦var ↦ val⟧) ↔ preservesEvm s₀ s₁ := by | ||
unfold preservesEvm | ||
cases s₀ <;> cases s₁ <;> simp | ||
swap | ||
unfold State.insert; simp | ||
unfold State.insert; simp | ||
|
||
end Clear.Utilities |
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is just a projection function, it's not a monotonicity statement. It says that you can take out the last component of and.
The thing that you will need at some point is stuff like: insert is monotonic in its second argument given the preorder on your maps, i.e.:
m1 <= m2 -> insert x m1 <= insert x m2.