-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
zib-InstructionsForUse #75
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Need to get nl-core-profile too. When we have nothing to profile in the nl-core profile we can set populate the alternate name on the root element.
<use value="work" /> | ||
</telecom> | ||
</contact> | ||
<description value="Pre-adopt of the `.renderedDosageInstructions` concept from the FHIR R5 medication resources. It provides a full representation of the dose of the medication included in all dosage instructions. To be used when multiple dosage instructions are included to represent complex dosing such as increasing or tapering doses." /> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Same as comment earlier: https://hl7.org/fhir/R5/versions.html#extensions
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
For this particular extension, we can apply this to multiple medication resources. This means that the url can't be resource specific (to mimic the hl7 extension as much as possible). So I think we can leave this one as it is? Or we have to create for each specific resource an .renderedDosageInstructions extension (so 1 for MedicationRequest, 1 for MedicationDispense, and 1 for MedicationStatement)? What do you think?
It will look like e.g.: http://nictiz.nl/fhir/5.0/StructureDefinition/extension-MedicationStatement.renderedDosageInstruction, etc.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
As discussed in teams chat, we think going forward with 3 extensions would be the way to go. To do a better preadopt of the preadopt ;)
Do you agree? If so, it can be changed.
No description provided.