Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Implement stage 'consistency-checks'. #27

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Sep 19, 2024
Merged

Conversation

martun
Copy link
Contributor

@martun martun commented Sep 19, 2024

No description provided.

@martun martun self-assigned this Sep 19, 2024
@martun martun force-pushed the add_consistency_checks branch 2 times, most recently from daa5ccb to 1b801bc Compare September 19, 2024 10:40
@martun martun force-pushed the add_consistency_checks branch from 1b801bc to 498376a Compare September 19, 2024 10:45
@martun martun requested a review from vo-nil September 19, 2024 10:45
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Sep 19, 2024

Clang Test Results

  153 files  ±0    153 suites  ±0   6m 56s ⏱️ -1s
3 197 tests ±0  3 191 ✅ ±0  6 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 
3 264 runs  ±0  3 258 ✅ ±0  6 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit 5545316. ± Comparison against base commit a478dcf.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Sep 19, 2024

Gcc Test Results

  153 files  ±0    153 suites  ±0   8m 4s ⏱️ ±0s
3 197 tests ±0  3 191 ✅ ±0  6 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 
3 264 runs  ±0  3 258 ✅ ±0  6 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit 5545316. ± Comparison against base commit a478dcf.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

@martun martun force-pushed the add_consistency_checks branch from 053bec9 to 5545316 Compare September 19, 2024 13:40
@martun martun merged commit e717055 into master Sep 19, 2024
8 checks passed
@martun martun deleted the add_consistency_checks branch October 23, 2024 10:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants