Module/options request: filebrowser

[nielsegberts]

Project description

This is a continuation of #122339 to add options to easily set up File Browser now that it's packaged.

I've started development with this commit:

nielsegberts@6d39a0b

[kraftnix]

I've tested your module and it appears to be running correctly. I would support you submitting a PR to upstream this.

The only comment I have on the implementation is that the services.filebrowser.baseUrl option example is misleading/incorrect, since baseurl upstream seems to actually be a base url path like /filebrowser rather than a FQDN like the example suggests (there doesn't appear to be documentation for what baseurl actually does in the upstream docs other than "base url").

When I set baseUrl to a FQDN like the example suggests, the filebrowser UI was attempting to make requests to https://filebrowser.mydomain.com/filebrowser.mydomain.com, setting this to "" fixed the issue.

[cimm]

I was annoyed by the lack of options as well and created my own File Browser module over the weekend: cimm@92285eb

Only then did I notice this GitHub issue. I should have searched here before spending the time redoing the same work. 🤦‍♂️ Ah, well, I learned something in the process and took a slightly different approach. I noticed this issue is almost a year old, so have there been any attempts to get it merged?

• I went for the DynamicUser = "yes"; approach in the systemd unit. It doesn't need a user, but more importantly, it sandboxes the service. This should improve security but also means the dataDir and database locations are limited to the /var/lib/filebrowser path. I'm not claiming this is better; I never wrote a Nix module before, but it might be interesting to discuss?
• I added all the command line options, maybe this is overkill?
• I escapeShellArg all string options to make sure special characters don't break the command.
• I also added a simple test to make sure the service is up.

[pinpox]

Only then did I notice this GitHub issue. I should have searched here before spending the time redoing the same work.

I haven't looked much into this lately, but if you have improvements to the module I would be awesome if you can make a PR. Feel free to ping me for review and testing.

[cimm]

When creating the pull request, I noticed there was already a pending pull request: #289750. I won't open another one, better focus our efforts on the pending one.