Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

maintainers: remove inactive maintainers #286363

Closed
wants to merge 4 commits into from
Closed

maintainers: remove inactive maintainers #286363

wants to merge 4 commits into from

Conversation

AndersonTorres
Copy link
Member

@AndersonTorres AndersonTorres commented Feb 4, 2024 •
edited
Loading

Description of changes

Following #290642

Things done

  • Built on platform(s)
    • x86_64-linux
    • aarch64-linux
    • x86_64-darwin
    • aarch64-darwin
  • For non-Linux: Is sandboxing enabled in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
    • sandbox = relaxed
    • sandbox = true
  • Tested, as applicable:
  • Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage
  • Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • 24.05 Release Notes (or backporting 23.05 and 23.11 Release notes)
    • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
    • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
    • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.

@AndersonTorres
treewide: remove MP2E from meta.maintainers lists
0e0a572 
Because there is no activity in Nixpkgs registered since 2017.
The packages in this commit will not be orphaned.
@AndersonTorres
treewide: remove MP2E from meta.maintainers lists
b3168b7 
Because there is no activity in Nixpkgs registered since 2017.
The packages in this commit will be orphaned.
@AndersonTorres
teams.libretro.members: remove MP2E
bd0d5d9 
Because there is no activity in Nixpkgs registered since 2017.
@AndersonTorres
maintainers: remove MP2E
6287420 
Because there is no activity in Nixpkgs registered since 2017.
@ofborg ofborg bot added 10.rebuild-darwin: 0 This PR does not cause any packages to rebuild 10.rebuild-linux: 0 This PR does not cause any packages to rebuild labels Feb 5, 2024
@AndersonTorres
Copy link
Member Author

@MP2E

@AndersonTorres AndersonTorres marked this pull request as ready for review February 5, 2024 17:32
@AndersonTorres AndersonTorres marked this pull request as draft February 10, 2024 22:41
@AndersonTorres
Copy link
Member Author

AndersonTorres commented Feb 10, 2024 •
edited
Loading

Drafting because I want to adopt some!

@AndersonTorres AndersonTorres changed the title maintainers: remove MP2E maintainers: remove inactive maintainers Feb 25, 2024
@wegank wegank added the 2.status: merge conflict This PR has merge conflicts with the target branch label Mar 20, 2024
@AndersonTorres
Copy link
Member Author

No need for a tree-wide right now.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
2.status: merge conflict This PR has merge conflicts with the target branch 10.rebuild-darwin: 0 This PR does not cause any packages to rebuild 10.rebuild-linux: 0 This PR does not cause any packages to rebuild
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@AndersonTorres @wegank