Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

nixpkgs-check-by-name: 0.1.0 -> 0.1.1 #303140

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 10, 2024

Conversation

infinixbot
Copy link
Contributor

This is an automated PR to update the version of nixpkgs-check-by-name, which is used by CI to check the pkgs/by-name directory. The update was performed by running pkgs/test/check-by-name/update-pinned-tool.sh.
This PR updates the tool to version 0.1.1.

@infinisil
Copy link
Member

We're still figuring out changelogs for nixpkgs-check-by-name, so for now I'll just briefly mention the main changes manually:

@NixOSInfra NixOSInfra added the 12. first-time contribution This PR is the author's first one; please be gentle! label Apr 10, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@philiptaron philiptaron left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🏞️

Let's keep it green.

@ofborg ofborg bot added 10.rebuild-darwin: 0 This PR does not cause any packages to rebuild on Darwin 10.rebuild-linux: 0 This PR does not cause any packages to rebuild on Linux labels Apr 10, 2024
@pSub pSub merged commit 0137095 into NixOS:master Apr 10, 2024
22 checks passed
@infinisil
Copy link
Member

I think I should merge these updates myself, because they have the potential to break CI. It's fine for now though, but I guess we should put this more explicitly in the PR description :)

@pSub
Copy link
Member

pSub commented Apr 10, 2024

@infinisil: I'm sorry about that. I hope it won't break anything. The PR looked ready for me. Maybe nexttime you want to assign it to yourself. That would've prevented (at least) me from merging it. 😃

@infinisil
Copy link
Member

No worries, CI seems to work just fine, assigning to me sounds good for next time :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
10.rebuild-darwin: 0 This PR does not cause any packages to rebuild on Darwin 10.rebuild-linux: 0 This PR does not cause any packages to rebuild on Linux 12. first-time contribution This PR is the author's first one; please be gentle!
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants