[23.11] octoprint: apply patch for CVE-2024-28237 #307206
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
The 1.10.0 upgrade from NixOS#306861 seems to be too big to be safely backported. I also did not backport CVE-2024-23637: it is split across a series of patches and impacts quite sensitive parts of OctoPrint. I am not feeling confident enough to backport it and exploiting the issue requires an admin level access.
risicle
approved these changes
Apr 28, 2024
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Think that's the right call on CVE-2024-23637.
nixpkgs-review happy, macos 12 x86_64 & nixos x86_64. passthru.tests pass.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description of changes
The 1.10.0 upgrade from #306861 seems to be too big to be safely backported.
I also did not backport CVE-2024-23637: it is split across a series of patches and impacts quite sensitive parts of OctoPrint. I am not feeling confident enough to backport it and exploiting the issue requires an admin level access.
Things done
nix.conf? (See Nix manual)sandbox = relaxedsandbox = truenix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage./result/bin/)Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.