Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

tracy: 0.10 -> 0.11.1 + other changes #328253

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

paveloom
Copy link
Member

@paveloom paveloom commented Jul 18, 2024

Description of changes

https://github.com/wolfpld/tracy/releases/tag/v0.11.0
https://github.com/wolfpld/tracy/releases/tag/v0.11.1

Supersedes #320273. A follow up to #315205.

Things done

  • Built on platform(s)
    • x86_64-linux
    • aarch64-linux
    • x86_64-darwin
    • aarch64-darwin
  • For non-Linux: Is sandboxing enabled in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
    • sandbox = relaxed
    • sandbox = true
  • Tested, as applicable:
  • Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage
  • Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • 24.11 Release Notes (or backporting 23.11 and 24.05 Release notes)
    • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
    • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
    • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.

programotuojes added a commit to programotuojes/nixos-config that referenced this pull request Aug 12, 2024
@paveloom paveloom changed the title tracy: 0.10 -> 0.11.0 + other changes tracy: 0.10 -> 0.11.1 + other changes Aug 22, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@RobWalt RobWalt left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I was just about to write the update when I spotted yours. I build it on my machine (tracy-wayland on x86_64-linux) and it works fine. Code also looks fine in my eyes but I'm not an nix expert either (!)

Thanks for this PR!

@carlthome
Copy link
Member

There's some conflicts blocking a merge, I assume. Would be nice to have this in!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants