Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

treewide: remove ralith from meta.maintainers [inactivity] [orphans] #332609

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 19, 2024

Conversation

AndersonTorres
Copy link
Member

Description of changes

Things done

  • Built on platform(s)
    • x86_64-linux
    • aarch64-linux
    • x86_64-darwin
    • aarch64-darwin
  • For non-Linux: Is sandboxing enabled in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
    • sandbox = relaxed
    • sandbox = true
  • Tested, as applicable:
  • Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage
  • Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • 24.11 Release Notes (or backporting 23.11 and 24.05 Release notes)
    • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
    • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
    • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.

@AndersonTorres AndersonTorres marked this pull request as ready for review August 6, 2024 00:41
@AndersonTorres AndersonTorres marked this pull request as draft August 6, 2024 00:45
@AndersonTorres AndersonTorres marked this pull request as ready for review August 9, 2024 21:13
@AndersonTorres
Copy link
Member Author

#332390 (comment)

@AndersonTorres
Copy link
Member Author

P.S.: tracked at #290642

@superherointj superherointj merged commit af52c7b into NixOS:master Aug 19, 2024
24 checks passed
@bendlas
Copy link
Contributor

bendlas commented Aug 26, 2024

This removal PR has already been merged, despite not being grounded within community consensus. See #337478 (comment)

@Ralith be sure that we value your involvement and any time you may have to spare, helping with the packages you're maintaining and others as well, and if you decide to come back, please don't hesitate to be added to maintainers again.

@superherointj
Copy link
Contributor

This removal PR has already been merged, despite not being grounded within community consensus. See #337478 (comment)

@Ralith be sure that we value your involvement and any time you may have to spare, helping with the packages you're maintaining and others as well, and if you decide to come back, please don't hesitate to be added to maintainers again.

image

@bendlas
Copy link
Contributor

bendlas commented Aug 26, 2024

Any reasonably polite person would say "sure, count me out". The fact that this was never properly discussed or decided, invalidates the whole process.

@AndersonTorres AndersonTorres deleted the remove-ralith branch August 26, 2024 20:16
@Ralith
Copy link
Contributor

Ralith commented Aug 27, 2024

To be very clear, these are two packages I genuinely don't intend to maintain any more, so I'm happy to have my name taken off them. There are plenty of other packages I'm still actively involved in to varying extents (I'm not sure why this PR says "treewide").

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants