-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
treewide/nixos: remove with lib;
part 3
#335623
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
treewide/nixos: remove with lib;
part 3
#335623
Conversation
b00f6d9
to
6412e0b
Compare
with lib;
part 3
19b42fc
to
8ac0216
Compare
4341673
to
3250550
Compare
3250550
to
c022b7b
Compare
1b2289a
to
6b8fd89
Compare
6b8fd89
to
be9cf40
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
AFAIK this is done by some automation: #335603 (comment)
Given that this has always caused a notable fallout that maintainers had to fix afterwards, did you fix the script or are we expecting a different result this time?
yes exactly the same script. Automation is not changed. I was expecting 2 reviewers is enough to detect the problems. Definitely not a fault of the reviewers! |
Description of changes
part of #208242
Things done
nix.conf
? (See Nix manual)sandbox = relaxed
sandbox = true
nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD"
. Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage./result/bin/
)Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.