Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[24.05] forgejo: 7.0.7 -> 7.0.8 #338214

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

[24.05] forgejo: 7.0.7 -> 7.0.8 #338214

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

NyCodeGHG
Copy link
Member

@NyCodeGHG NyCodeGHG commented Aug 29, 2024 •
edited
Loading

https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/milestone/7729
diff: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/compare/v7.0.7..v7.0.8

Description of changes

Things done

  • Built on platform(s)
    • x86_64-linux
    • aarch64-linux
    • x86_64-darwin
    • aarch64-darwin
  • For non-Linux: Is sandboxing enabled in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
    • sandbox = relaxed
    • sandbox = true
  • Tested, as applicable:
  • Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage
  • Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • 24.11 Release Notes (or backporting 23.11 and 24.05 Release notes)
    • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
    • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
    • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.

@NyCodeGHG NyCodeGHG added the 1.severity: security Issues which raise a security issue, or PRs that fix one label Aug 29, 2024
@NyCodeGHG NyCodeGHG changed the title forgejo: 7.0.7 -> 7.0.8 [24.05] forgejo: 7.0.7 -> 7.0.8 Aug 29, 2024
@ofborg ofborg bot requested a review from urandom2 August 29, 2024 17:02
mweinelt
mweinelt requested changes Aug 29, 2024
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@mweinelt mweinelt left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Needs to be a cherry-pick from master.

(git cherry-pick -x)

@adamcstephens
Copy link
Contributor

It would be a cherry pick in name only, as master has diverged and been split into two packages.

@mweinelt
Copy link
Member

Then pick and amend the forgejo-lts bump.

@adamcstephens
Copy link
Contributor

I wasn't able to amend this PR, so #338305

@NyCodeGHG NyCodeGHG deleted the forgejo-stable branch September 19, 2024 12:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@mweinelt mweinelt mweinelt requested changes

@adamcstephens adamcstephens Awaiting requested review from adamcstephens

@bendlas bendlas Awaiting requested review from bendlas

@emilylange emilylange Awaiting requested review from emilylange

@urandom2 urandom2 Awaiting requested review from urandom2

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
1.severity: security Issues which raise a security issue, or PRs that fix one 10.rebuild-darwin: 1-10 10.rebuild-darwin: 1 10.rebuild-linux: 1-10 10.rebuild-linux: 1
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
3 participants
@NyCodeGHG @adamcstephens @mweinelt