Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[release-24.05] Nix 2.24.6 + nix git bump #341049

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Sep 10, 2024
Merged

Conversation

Mic92
Copy link
Member

@Mic92 Mic92 commented Sep 10, 2024

Description of changes

Things done

  • Built on platform(s)
    • x86_64-linux
    • aarch64-linux
    • x86_64-darwin
    • aarch64-darwin
  • For non-Linux: Is sandboxing enabled in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
    • sandbox = relaxed
    • sandbox = true
  • Tested, as applicable:
  • Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage
  • Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • 24.11 Release Notes (or backporting 23.11 and 24.05 Release notes)
    • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
    • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
    • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.

Copy link
Contributor

@tomberek tomberek left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It's better to have the todo+tech debt than the bad version. I'll take a look at the aarch64 problem after work.

@ofborg ofborg bot added the 8.has: package (new) This PR adds a new package label Sep 10, 2024
@Mic92 Mic92 merged commit 64db23c into NixOS:release-24.05 Sep 10, 2024
30 of 34 checks passed
@Mic92 Mic92 deleted the nix-backport branch September 10, 2024 21:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants