Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

tests: update for stricter timeout handling #2184

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

victorjulien
Copy link
Member

#2116 rebased

Copy link
Collaborator

@catenacyber catenacyber left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Makes sense.

Do you know which commit exactly changed this behavior ?
Like OISF/suricata@de9ceab ?

@catenacyber catenacyber added the requires suricata pr Depends on a PR in Suricata label Dec 19, 2024
@victorjulien
Copy link
Member Author

Makes sense.

Do you know which commit exactly changed this behavior ? Like OISF/suricata@de9ceab ?

Probably OISF/suricata@4f926a6

The diff is caused by flows that were previously considered not timed out due to imprecision, now getting considered timed out. So a new flow is created.

@victorjulien
Copy link
Member Author

Replaced by #2203

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
requires suricata pr Depends on a PR in Suricata
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants