rust: Update sawp dependencies to 0.13.1 due to SPDX license compatibility/v2

[bmbenson]

Previous PR: #12328

Contribution style:

• I have read the contributing guide lines at
  https://docs.suricata.io/en/latest/devguide/contributing/contribution-process.html

Our Contribution agreements:

• I have signed the Open Information Security Foundation contribution agreement at
  https://suricata.io/about/contribution-agreement/ (note: this is only required once)

Changes (if applicable):

• [N/A] I have updated the User Guide (in doc/userguide/) to reflect the changes made
• [N/A] I have updated the JSON schema (in etc/schema.json) to reflect all logging changes
  (including schema descriptions)

Describe changes:

• Update sawp dependencies to 0.13.1 due to SPDX license compatibility. -- Upstream diff: CybercentreCanada/sawp@sawp-0.12.1...sawp-0.13.1
  Changes since v1:
• Made the updates to the master branch
• Updated Cargo.lock.in as well with the updated hashes.

[github-actions]

NOTE: This PR may contain new authors.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 80.57%. Comparing base (def22fa) to head (0083f94).
Report is 131 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master   #12357      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   83.23%   80.57%   -2.67%     
==========================================
  Files         912      925      +13     
  Lines      257647   259292    +1645     
==========================================
- Hits       214450   208915    -5535     
- Misses      43197    50377    +7180     

Flag	Coverage Δ
fuzzcorpus	56.15% <ø> (-5.07%)	⬇️
livemode	19.39% <ø> (-0.01%)	⬇️
pcap	44.20% <ø> (-0.20%)	⬇️
suricata-verify	63.40% <ø> (+0.53%)	⬆️
unittests	58.44% <ø> (-0.75%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

[catenacyber]

Thanks for the work

CI : ✅
Code : good
Commits segmentation : ok
Commit messages : ⚠️ can you prefix the commit title with rust: see commit 8e408d3 for an example
Git ID set : looks fine for me
CLA : I have no access
Doc update : not needed
Redmine ticket : do we need one ?
Rustfmt : no rust
Tests : covered by current tests
Dependencies added: none :-)

[catenacyber]

I meant the commit title, not the PR title :-)

[bmbenson]

Made the requested update to the commit message, and as a bonus to the PR description! :p

[catenacyber]

Looks good to me, @jasonish any opinion on this license stuff ?

[github-actions]

NOTE: This PR may contain new authors.

[jasonish]

Looks good to me, @jasonish any opinion on this license stuff ?

I like the SPDX stuff.

[jasonish]

LGTM