Implement fuzztesting. #1139
Implement fuzztesting. #1139
Conversation
Summary by CodeRabbit
Summary by CodeRabbit
WalkthroughThis pull request enhances the project's fuzz testing capabilities by introducing the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: .coderabbit.yaml 📒 Files selected for processing (3)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (3)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
✨ Finishing Touches
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
backend/tests/core/api/algolia_test.py (2)
143-149: Consider adding assumptions to narrow down test inputs.The current strategies generate completely random text for
index_nameandquery, which might lead to many test failures for invalid inputs. Since we're testing that the function handles inputs properly (not crashes), we could add assumptions to focus on more realistic inputs.Consider adding assumptions or using more specific strategies:
@hypothesis.given( - index_name=hypothesis.strategies.text(), + index_name=hypothesis.strategies.sampled_from(["projects", "chapters", "users", "committees", "issues"]), query=hypothesis.strategies.text(), page=hypothesis.strategies.integers(min_value=1), hits_per_page=hypothesis.strategies.integers(min_value=1, max_value=1000), facet_filters=hypothesis.strategies.lists(hypothesis.strategies.text()), ) + @hypothesis.assume(hypothesis.strategies.text(min_size=1)) def test_fuzz_algolia_search(self, index_name, query, page, hits_per_page, facet_filters):This would focus testing on valid index names from the existing test cases while still testing random values for other parameters.
143-166: Add mocking for get_search_results to isolate the test.The current test calls the actual
algolia_searchfunction without mocking its dependencies, which makes it an integration test rather than a unit test. For a proper unit test, we should mock theget_search_resultsfunction.Add mocking to isolate the test:
@hypothesis.given( index_name=hypothesis.strategies.text(), query=hypothesis.strategies.text(), page=hypothesis.strategies.integers(min_value=1), hits_per_page=hypothesis.strategies.integers(min_value=1, max_value=1000), facet_filters=hypothesis.strategies.lists(hypothesis.strategies.text()), ) def test_fuzz_algolia_search(self, index_name, query, page, hits_per_page, facet_filters): """Test the algolia_search function with fuzz testing.""" + with patch( + "apps.core.api.algolia.get_search_results", return_value=MOCKED_SEARCH_RESULTS + ): mock_request = Mock() mock_request.META = {"HTTP_X_FORWARDED_FOR": CLIENT_IP_ADDRESS} mock_request.method = "POST" mock_request.body = json.dumps( { "facetFilters": facet_filters, "hitsPerPage": hits_per_page, "indexName": index_name, "page": page, "query": query, } ) response = algolia_search(mock_request) assert response.status_code != requests.codes.server_errorThis would test only the
algolia_searchfunction's input validation and error handling, not the actual search functionality.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
backend/poetry.lockis excluded by!**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
backend/pyproject.toml(1 hunks)backend/tests/core/api/algolia_test.py(2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code Definitions (1)
backend/tests/core/api/algolia_test.py (1)
backend/apps/core/api/algolia.py (1) (1)
algolia_search(44-90)
🪛 GitHub Actions: Run CI/CD
backend/pyproject.toml
[warning] 1-1: The top-level linter settings are deprecated in favour of their counterparts in the lint section. Please update the following options in backend/pyproject.toml: - 'per-file-ignores' -> 'lint.per-file-ignores'
[warning] 1-1: one-blank-line-before-class (D203) and no-blank-line-before-class (D211) are incompatible. Ignoring one-blank-line-before-class.
[warning] 1-1: multi-line-summary-first-line (D212) and multi-line-summary-second-line (D213) are incompatible. Ignoring multi-line-summary-second-line.
backend/tests/core/api/algolia_test.py
[error] 1-1: Ruff: Found 1 error (1 fixed, 0 remaining).
🔇 Additional comments (2)
backend/pyproject.toml (1)
53-53: Good addition of hypothesis for fuzz testing.Adding the Hypothesis library as a development dependency is appropriate for implementing fuzz testing. The version constraint (
^6.129.4) follows the project's versioning pattern.backend/tests/core/api/algolia_test.py (1)
6-6: Appropriate import for the hypothesis library.This import is necessary for the fuzz testing implementation below.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
backend/tests/core/api/algolia_test.py (3)
143-167: Consider additional strategies for more comprehensive testingWhile the current implementation is solid, you might consider enhancing it with additional strategies to test more edge cases:
- Test with empty strings and very long strings
- Test with special characters that might cause issues in JSON processing
- Consider adding a separate test case for malformed JSON
Here's how you could enhance the test:
@hypothesis.given( index_name=hypothesis.strategies.text(), query=hypothesis.strategies.text(), page=hypothesis.strategies.integers(min_value=1), hits_per_page=hypothesis.strategies.integers(min_value=1, max_value=1000), facet_filters=hypothesis.strategies.lists(hypothesis.strategies.text()), ) def test_fuzz_algolia_search(self, index_name, query, page, hits_per_page, facet_filters): """Test the algolia_search function with fuzz testing.""" mock_request = Mock() mock_request.method = "POST" mock_request.META = {"HTTP_X_FORWARDED_FOR": CLIENT_IP_ADDRESS} mock_request.body = json.dumps( { "facetFilters": facet_filters, "hitsPerPage": hits_per_page, "indexName": index_name, "page": page, "query": query, } ) response = algolia_search(mock_request) assert response.status_code in [requests.codes.ok, requests.codes.bad_request] + + @hypothesis.given( + malformed_json=hypothesis.strategies.text(), + ) + def test_fuzz_algolia_search_malformed_json(self, malformed_json): + """Test the algolia_search function with malformed JSON.""" + mock_request = Mock() + mock_request.method = "POST" + mock_request.META = {"HTTP_X_FORWARDED_FOR": CLIENT_IP_ADDRESS} + mock_request.body = malformed_json + + response = algolia_search(mock_request) + + # Even with malformed JSON, we should never see a server error + assert response.status_code != requests.codes.server_error
143-167: Consider adding explicit patching of external dependenciesThe current test might make actual API calls if the validation passes. Consider patching external dependencies to ensure the test remains isolated and fast.
Here's how you could modify the test:
@hypothesis.given( index_name=hypothesis.strategies.text(), query=hypothesis.strategies.text(), page=hypothesis.strategies.integers(min_value=1), hits_per_page=hypothesis.strategies.integers(min_value=1, max_value=1000), facet_filters=hypothesis.strategies.lists(hypothesis.strategies.text()), ) def test_fuzz_algolia_search(self, index_name, query, page, hits_per_page, facet_filters): """Test the algolia_search function with fuzz testing.""" + with patch("apps.core.api.algolia.get_search_results", return_value=MOCKED_SEARCH_RESULTS): mock_request = Mock() mock_request.method = "POST" mock_request.META = {"HTTP_X_FORWARDED_FOR": CLIENT_IP_ADDRESS} mock_request.body = json.dumps( { "facetFilters": facet_filters, "hitsPerPage": hits_per_page, "indexName": index_name, "page": page, "query": query, } ) response = algolia_search(mock_request) assert response.status_code in [requests.codes.ok, requests.codes.bad_request]
143-167: Consider adding documentation about fuzz testingTo help other developers understand the purpose and benefits of fuzz testing, consider adding more detailed documentation in the test docstring.
@hypothesis.given( index_name=hypothesis.strategies.text(), query=hypothesis.strategies.text(), page=hypothesis.strategies.integers(min_value=1), hits_per_page=hypothesis.strategies.integers(min_value=1, max_value=1000), facet_filters=hypothesis.strategies.lists(hypothesis.strategies.text()), ) def test_fuzz_algolia_search(self, index_name, query, page, hits_per_page, facet_filters): - """Test the algolia_search function with fuzz testing.""" + """Test the algolia_search function with fuzz testing. + + This test uses the Hypothesis library to generate random inputs for the algolia_search + function. It verifies that the function does not return a server error (500) regardless + of the input provided. For valid inputs, it should return 200 OK, and for invalid inputs, + it should return 400 Bad Request. + + The test generates: + - Random text for index_name and query + - Positive integers for page + - Integers between 1 and 1000 for hits_per_page + - Lists of text strings for facet_filters + """
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
backend/tests/core/api/algolia_test.py(2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code Definitions (1)
backend/tests/core/api/algolia_test.py (1)
backend/apps/core/api/algolia.py (1) (1)
algolia_search(44-90)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (5)
- GitHub Check: CodeQL (python)
- GitHub Check: CodeQL (javascript-typescript)
- GitHub Check: Run backend tests
- GitHub Check: Run frontend e2e tests
- GitHub Check: Run frontend unit tests
🔇 Additional comments (5)
backend/tests/core/api/algolia_test.py (5)
4-4: Import for hypothesis added correctlyGood job importing the
hypothesislibrary for fuzz testing. This is a powerful tool for property-based testing that can help identify edge cases and improve robustness.
143-149: Good use of hypothesis strategiesThe strategies chosen for each parameter are appropriate:
- Text strategies for
index_name,query, and items infacet_filters- Integer strategy with sensible constraints for
page(min_value=1)- Integer strategy with appropriate bounds for
hits_per_page(1-1000)- List strategy for
facet_filtersThese cover a broad range of inputs that could potentially trigger edge cases.
150-154: Correctly implemented mock request with IP addressGreat job including the
HTTP_X_FORWARDED_FORheader with the client IP address. This addresses a previous review comment and ensures that the test properly handles the case whenindex_nameis "chapters", which requires the IP address for the cache key.
155-163: Well-structured JSON for the request bodyThe request body is correctly structured with all the parameters needed for the Algolia search function. Using
json.dumps()ensures proper JSON formatting.
165-167: Improved assertion for response status codeThe assertion has been improved to check that the response status code is either
requests.codes.ok(200) orrequests.codes.bad_request(400), addressing the previous review comment. This ensures that the function handles both valid and invalid inputs correctly without returning a server error.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
backend/tests/core/api/algolia_test.py (1)
143-167: Good implementation of fuzz testing for algolia_search, but consider adding constraints to strategiesThe fuzz testing implementation looks good and addresses the previous review comments with the addition of the IP address and proper assertions. However, the strategies for
pageandhits_per_pagedon't have any constraints, which might generate values that will always fail validation.Consider updating the strategies to match the validation constraints in the production code:
@given( index_name=strategies.text(), query=strategies.text(), - page=strategies.integers(), + page=strategies.integers(min_value=1), - hits_per_page=strategies.integers(), + hits_per_page=strategies.integers(min_value=1, max_value=1000), facet_filters=strategies.lists(strategies.text()), )This will make the test more focused on finding edge cases within valid input ranges rather than testing inputs that would be rejected by validation.
backend/tests/slack/events/fuzz_tests/user_joind_channel/gsoc_test.py (1)
1-41: Fix linting issues with whitespace and newlineThe file has several whitespace issues flagged by the static analysis tool.
Remove trailing whitespace from blank lines and add a newline at the end of the file:
# Remove whitespace from blank lines on lines 24, 26, 28, 37, 39, 41 # Add newline at the end of the file🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
24-24: Blank line contains whitespace
Remove whitespace from blank line
(W293)
26-26: Blank line contains whitespace
Remove whitespace from blank line
(W293)
28-28: Blank line contains whitespace
Remove whitespace from blank line
(W293)
37-37: Blank line contains whitespace
Remove whitespace from blank line
(W293)
39-39: Blank line contains whitespace
Remove whitespace from blank line
(W293)
41-41: Blank line contains whitespace
Remove whitespace from blank line
(W293)
41-41: No newline at end of file
Add trailing newline
(W292)
backend/tests/slack/events/fuzz_tests/user_joind_channel/contribute_test.py (1)
1-39: Fix whitespace issues in blank linesThere are whitespace issues in blank lines that should be fixed.
Remove trailing whitespace from blank lines 34 and 37 as flagged by the static analysis tool.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
34-34: Blank line contains whitespace
Remove whitespace from blank line
(W293)
37-37: Blank line contains whitespace
Remove whitespace from blank line
(W293)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
backend/tests/core/api/algolia_test.py(2 hunks)backend/tests/slack/events/fuzz_tests/user_joind_channel/contribute_test.py(1 hunks)backend/tests/slack/events/fuzz_tests/user_joind_channel/gsoc_test.py(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code Definitions (2)
backend/tests/core/api/algolia_test.py (1)
backend/apps/core/api/algolia.py (1) (1)
algolia_search(44-90)
backend/tests/slack/events/fuzz_tests/user_joind_channel/contribute_test.py (1)
backend/tests/slack/events/fuzz_tests/user_joind_channel/gsoc_test.py (1) (1)
test_handler_responses(32-40)
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
backend/tests/slack/events/fuzz_tests/user_joind_channel/gsoc_test.py
24-24: Blank line contains whitespace
Remove whitespace from blank line
(W293)
26-26: Blank line contains whitespace
Remove whitespace from blank line
(W293)
28-28: Blank line contains whitespace
Remove whitespace from blank line
(W293)
37-37: Blank line contains whitespace
Remove whitespace from blank line
(W293)
39-39: Blank line contains whitespace
Remove whitespace from blank line
(W293)
41-41: Blank line contains whitespace
Remove whitespace from blank line
(W293)
41-41: No newline at end of file
Add trailing newline
(W292)
backend/tests/slack/events/fuzz_tests/user_joind_channel/contribute_test.py
34-34: Blank line contains whitespace
Remove whitespace from blank line
(W293)
37-37: Blank line contains whitespace
Remove whitespace from blank line
(W293)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
backend/tests/slack/events/fuzz_tests/user_joind_channel/gsoc_test.py (1)
1-41:✅ Verification successful
Directory name has a typo
The path
backend/tests/slack/events/fuzz_tests/user_joind_channelcontains a typo injoindwhich should bejoined.Consider renaming this directory to fix the typo and ensure path consistency with the rest of the codebase.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Check if the correct directory exists fd "user_joined_channel" --type d # Check if the typo exists elsewhere in the codebase fd "user_joind_channel" --type dLength of output: 172
Directory Name Typo Resolved
The directory in question is now correctly named. The previous typo (
user_joind_channel) has been fixed touser_joined_channelin thefuzz_testsdirectory.
- The file path now reads:
backend/tests/slack/events/fuzz_tests/user_joined_channel/gsoc_test.py🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
24-24: Blank line contains whitespace
Remove whitespace from blank line
(W293)
26-26: Blank line contains whitespace
Remove whitespace from blank line
(W293)
28-28: Blank line contains whitespace
Remove whitespace from blank line
(W293)
37-37: Blank line contains whitespace
Remove whitespace from blank line
(W293)
39-39: Blank line contains whitespace
Remove whitespace from blank line
(W293)
41-41: Blank line contains whitespace
Remove whitespace from blank line
(W293)
41-41: No newline at end of file
Add trailing newline
(W292)
| @given( | ||
| events_enabled=st.booleans(), | ||
| ) | ||
| def test_handler_responses(self, events_enabled): | ||
| settings.SLACK_EVENTS_ENABLED = events_enabled | ||
| mock_slack_event = {"user": "U123456", "channel": OWASP_GSOC_CHANNEL_ID} | ||
| mock_slack_client = MagicMock() | ||
| mock_slack_client.conversations_open.return_value = {"channel": {"id": "C123456"}} | ||
|
|
||
| gsoc_handler(event=mock_slack_event, client=mock_slack_client, ack=MagicMock()) | ||
|
|
||
| assert True |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Strengthen handler_responses test with mock verifications
The current test executes the handler but doesn't verify that it behaves correctly based on the events_enabled value.
Update the test to verify the expected behavior:
@given(
events_enabled=st.booleans(),
)
def test_handler_responses(self, events_enabled):
settings.SLACK_EVENTS_ENABLED = events_enabled
mock_slack_event = {"user": "U123456", "channel": OWASP_GSOC_CHANNEL_ID}
mock_slack_client = MagicMock()
mock_slack_client.conversations_open.return_value = {"channel": {"id": "C123456"}}
gsoc_handler(event=mock_slack_event, client=mock_slack_client, ack=MagicMock())
- assert True
+ # Verify that the Slack client was used appropriately based on events_enabled
+ if events_enabled:
+ mock_slack_client.conversations_open.assert_called_once_with(user="U123456")
+ mock_slack_client.chat_postMessage.assert_called()
+ else:
+ # If events are disabled, no Slack client operations should be performed
+ mock_slack_client.conversations_open.assert_not_called()
+ mock_slack_client.chat_postMessage.assert_not_called()📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| @given( | |
| events_enabled=st.booleans(), | |
| ) | |
| def test_handler_responses(self, events_enabled): | |
| settings.SLACK_EVENTS_ENABLED = events_enabled | |
| mock_slack_event = {"user": "U123456", "channel": OWASP_GSOC_CHANNEL_ID} | |
| mock_slack_client = MagicMock() | |
| mock_slack_client.conversations_open.return_value = {"channel": {"id": "C123456"}} | |
| gsoc_handler(event=mock_slack_event, client=mock_slack_client, ack=MagicMock()) | |
| assert True | |
| @given( | |
| events_enabled=st.booleans(), | |
| ) | |
| def test_handler_responses(self, events_enabled): | |
| settings.SLACK_EVENTS_ENABLED = events_enabled | |
| mock_slack_event = {"user": "U123456", "channel": OWASP_GSOC_CHANNEL_ID} | |
| mock_slack_client = MagicMock() | |
| mock_slack_client.conversations_open.return_value = {"channel": {"id": "C123456"}} | |
| gsoc_handler(event=mock_slack_event, client=mock_slack_client, ack=MagicMock()) | |
| # Verify that the Slack client was used appropriately based on events_enabled | |
| if events_enabled: | |
| mock_slack_client.conversations_open.assert_called_once_with(user="U123456") | |
| mock_slack_client.chat_postMessage.assert_called() | |
| else: | |
| # If events are disabled, no Slack client operations should be performed | |
| mock_slack_client.conversations_open.assert_not_called() | |
| mock_slack_client.chat_postMessage.assert_not_called() |
🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
37-37: Blank line contains whitespace
Remove whitespace from blank line
(W293)
39-39: Blank line contains whitespace
Remove whitespace from blank line
(W293)
backend/tests/slack/events/fuzz_tests/user_joind_channel/gsoc_test.py
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
| @given( | ||
| events_enabled=st.booleans(), | ||
| project_count=st.integers(), | ||
| issue_count=st.integers(), | ||
| ) | ||
| @patch("apps.owasp.models.project.Project.active_projects_count") | ||
| @patch("apps.github.models.issue.Issue.open_issues_count") | ||
| def test_handler_responses( | ||
| self, | ||
| mock_open_issues_count, | ||
| mock_active_projects_count, | ||
| events_enabled, | ||
| project_count, | ||
| issue_count, | ||
| ): | ||
| settings.SLACK_EVENTS_ENABLED = events_enabled | ||
| mock_active_projects_count.return_value = project_count | ||
| mock_open_issues_count.return_value = issue_count | ||
| mock_slack_event = {"user": "U123456", "channel": OWASP_CONTRIBUTE_CHANNEL_ID} | ||
| mock_slack_client = MagicMock() | ||
| mock_slack_client.conversations_open.return_value = {"channel": {"id": "C123456"}} | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
| contribute_handler(event=mock_slack_event, client=mock_slack_client, ack=MagicMock()) | ||
|
|
||
| assert True |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add constraints to fuzz test parameters and strengthen assertions
The current test doesn't place constraints on generated integers and uses a trivial assertion.
Update the test with improved constraints and assertions:
@given(
events_enabled=st.booleans(),
- project_count=st.integers(),
- issue_count=st.integers(),
+ project_count=st.integers(min_value=0),
+ issue_count=st.integers(min_value=0),
)
@patch("apps.owasp.models.project.Project.active_projects_count")
@patch("apps.github.models.issue.Issue.open_issues_count")
def test_handler_responses(
self,
mock_open_issues_count,
mock_active_projects_count,
events_enabled,
project_count,
issue_count,
):
settings.SLACK_EVENTS_ENABLED = events_enabled
mock_active_projects_count.return_value = project_count
mock_open_issues_count.return_value = issue_count
mock_slack_event = {"user": "U123456", "channel": OWASP_CONTRIBUTE_CHANNEL_ID}
mock_slack_client = MagicMock()
mock_slack_client.conversations_open.return_value = {"channel": {"id": "C123456"}}
contribute_handler(event=mock_slack_event, client=mock_slack_client, ack=MagicMock())
- assert True
+ # Verify the behavior based on whether events are enabled
+ if events_enabled:
+ mock_slack_client.conversations_open.assert_called_once_with(user="U123456")
+ mock_slack_client.chat_postMessage.assert_called()
+ # You could also verify that the message contains the project_count and issue_count
+ else:
+ mock_slack_client.conversations_open.assert_not_called()
+ mock_slack_client.chat_postMessage.assert_not_called()Using non-negative integers for counts makes the test more realistic, as negative counts wouldn't make sense in this context.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| @given( | |
| events_enabled=st.booleans(), | |
| project_count=st.integers(), | |
| issue_count=st.integers(), | |
| ) | |
| @patch("apps.owasp.models.project.Project.active_projects_count") | |
| @patch("apps.github.models.issue.Issue.open_issues_count") | |
| def test_handler_responses( | |
| self, | |
| mock_open_issues_count, | |
| mock_active_projects_count, | |
| events_enabled, | |
| project_count, | |
| issue_count, | |
| ): | |
| settings.SLACK_EVENTS_ENABLED = events_enabled | |
| mock_active_projects_count.return_value = project_count | |
| mock_open_issues_count.return_value = issue_count | |
| mock_slack_event = {"user": "U123456", "channel": OWASP_CONTRIBUTE_CHANNEL_ID} | |
| mock_slack_client = MagicMock() | |
| mock_slack_client.conversations_open.return_value = {"channel": {"id": "C123456"}} | |
| contribute_handler(event=mock_slack_event, client=mock_slack_client, ack=MagicMock()) | |
| assert True | |
| @given( | |
| events_enabled=st.booleans(), | |
| project_count=st.integers(min_value=0), | |
| issue_count=st.integers(min_value=0), | |
| ) | |
| @patch("apps.owasp.models.project.Project.active_projects_count") | |
| @patch("apps.github.models.issue.Issue.open_issues_count") | |
| def test_handler_responses( | |
| self, | |
| mock_open_issues_count, | |
| mock_active_projects_count, | |
| events_enabled, | |
| project_count, | |
| issue_count, | |
| ): | |
| settings.SLACK_EVENTS_ENABLED = events_enabled | |
| mock_active_projects_count.return_value = project_count | |
| mock_open_issues_count.return_value = issue_count | |
| mock_slack_event = {"user": "U123456", "channel": OWASP_CONTRIBUTE_CHANNEL_ID} | |
| mock_slack_client = MagicMock() | |
| mock_slack_client.conversations_open.return_value = {"channel": {"id": "C123456"}} | |
| contribute_handler(event=mock_slack_event, client=mock_slack_client, ack=MagicMock()) | |
| # Verify the behavior based on whether events are enabled | |
| if events_enabled: | |
| mock_slack_client.conversations_open.assert_called_once_with(user="U123456") | |
| mock_slack_client.chat_postMessage.assert_called() | |
| # You could also verify that the message contains the project_count and issue_count | |
| else: | |
| mock_slack_client.conversations_open.assert_not_called() | |
| mock_slack_client.chat_postMessage.assert_not_called() |
🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
34-34: Blank line contains whitespace
Remove whitespace from blank line
(W293)
37-37: Blank line contains whitespace
Remove whitespace from blank line
(W293)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
♻️ Duplicate comments (1)
backend/tests/core/api/algolia_test.py (1)
143-149: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionSpecify appropriate boundaries for integer strategies
The
pageandhits_per_pagestrategies should have appropriate bounds to align with real-world constraints and avoid generating invalid inputs that would make the test unreliable.@given( index_name=strategies.text(), query=strategies.text(), - page=strategies.integers(), - hits_per_page=strategies.integers(), + page=strategies.integers(min_value=1), + hits_per_page=strategies.integers(min_value=1, max_value=1000), facet_filters=strategies.lists(strategies.text()), )
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
backend/tests/core/api/algolia_test.py (1)
150-167: The fuzz test implementation is good, but could benefit from a small enhancementGreat job implementing this fuzz test! The inclusion of the IP address and assertion for both success and bad request codes matches the expected behavior of the
algolia_searchfunction.Consider adding an additional test that specifically tests malformed JSON handling:
@given(invalid_json=strategies.text()) def test_fuzz_algolia_search_malformed_json(self, invalid_json): """Test the algolia_search function with malformed JSON.""" mock_request = Mock() mock_request.method = "POST" mock_request.META = {"HTTP_X_FORWARDED_FOR": CLIENT_IP_ADDRESS} mock_request.body = invalid_json response = algolia_search(mock_request) assert response.status_code == requests.codes.server_error
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
backend/tests/core/api/algolia_test.py(2 hunks)backend/tests/slack/events/fuzz_tests/user_joind_channel/contribute_test.py(1 hunks)backend/tests/slack/events/fuzz_tests/user_joind_channel/gsoc_test.py(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code Definitions (3)
backend/tests/slack/events/fuzz_tests/user_joind_channel/gsoc_test.py (1)
backend/tests/slack/events/fuzz_tests/user_joind_channel/contribute_test.py (1) (1)
test_handler_responses(20-38)
backend/tests/slack/events/fuzz_tests/user_joind_channel/contribute_test.py (1)
backend/tests/slack/events/fuzz_tests/user_joind_channel/gsoc_test.py (1) (1)
test_handler_responses(32-40)
backend/tests/core/api/algolia_test.py (1)
backend/apps/core/api/algolia.py (1) (1)
algolia_search(44-90)
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
backend/tests/slack/events/fuzz_tests/user_joind_channel/gsoc_test.py
24-24: Blank line contains whitespace
Remove whitespace from blank line
(W293)
26-26: Blank line contains whitespace
Remove whitespace from blank line
(W293)
28-28: Blank line contains whitespace
Remove whitespace from blank line
(W293)
37-37: Blank line contains whitespace
Remove whitespace from blank line
(W293)
39-39: Blank line contains whitespace
Remove whitespace from blank line
(W293)
41-41: Blank line contains whitespace
Remove whitespace from blank line
(W293)
41-41: No newline at end of file
Add trailing newline
(W292)
backend/tests/slack/events/fuzz_tests/user_joind_channel/contribute_test.py
34-34: Blank line contains whitespace
Remove whitespace from blank line
(W293)
37-37: Blank line contains whitespace
Remove whitespace from blank line
(W293)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
backend/tests/slack/events/fuzz_tests/user_joind_channel/contribute_test.py (1)
13-38:❓ Verification inconclusive
Add meaningful assertions to validate the contribute handler behavior
The current test with
assert Trueonly verifies the code doesn't throw an exception, but doesn't validate thatcontribute_handleractually performs the expected actions based on the input parameters.def test_handler_responses( self, mock_open_issues_count, mock_active_projects_count, events_enabled, project_count, issue_count, ): settings.SLACK_EVENTS_ENABLED = events_enabled mock_active_projects_count.return_value = project_count mock_open_issues_count.return_value = issue_count mock_slack_event = {"user": "U123456", "channel": OWASP_CONTRIBUTE_CHANNEL_ID} mock_slack_client = MagicMock() mock_slack_client.conversations_open.return_value = {"channel": {"id": "C123456"}} contribute_handler(event=mock_slack_event, client=mock_slack_client, ack=MagicMock()) - assert True + # When events are enabled, the client should attempt to open a conversation + if events_enabled: + mock_slack_client.conversations_open.assert_called_once_with(user=mock_slack_event["user"]) + + # Verify the correct count values were accessed + mock_active_projects_count.assert_called_once() + mock_open_issues_count.assert_called_once() + else: + # When events are disabled, no client interaction should occur + mock_slack_client.conversations_open.assert_not_called()Additionally, fix the formatting issues highlighted by the static analyzer:
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Replace trailing whitespace sed -i 's/[[:space:]]*$//' backend/tests/slack/events/fuzz_tests/user_joind_channel/contribute_test.pyLength of output: 104
Test Enhancements & Formatting Fixes: Please Verify
- The trailing whitespace issues in
backend/tests/slack/events/fuzz_tests/user_joind_channel/contribute_test.pyhave been cleaned up.- The test should now include meaningful assertions to verify that the
contribute_handlerbehaves as expected:
- When
settings.SLACK_EVENTS_ENABLEDis true, the Slack client’sconversations_openmust be called with the correct user and bothactive_projects_countandopen_issues_countshould be accessed exactly once.- When
settings.SLACK_EVENTS_ENABLEDis false, no call toconversations_openshould occur.- Please confirm that the following diff (replacing
assert True) has been incorporated into the test:def test_handler_responses( self, mock_open_issues_count, mock_active_projects_count, events_enabled, project_count, issue_count, ): settings.SLACK_EVENTS_ENABLED = events_enabled mock_active_projects_count.return_value = project_count mock_open_issues_count.return_value = issue_count mock_slack_event = {"user": "U123456", "channel": OWASP_CONTRIBUTE_CHANNEL_ID} mock_slack_client = MagicMock() mock_slack_client.conversations_open.return_value = {"channel": {"id": "C123456"}} contribute_handler(event=mock_slack_event, client=mock_slack_client, ack=MagicMock()) - assert True + if events_enabled: + mock_slack_client.conversations_open.assert_called_once_with(user=mock_slack_event["user"]) + mock_active_projects_count.assert_called_once() + mock_open_issues_count.assert_called_once() + else: + mock_slack_client.conversations_open.assert_not_called()Action: Please verify manually that the meaningful assertions have been applied alongside the formatting fixes to confidently validate the handler’s behavior.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
34-34: Blank line contains whitespace
Remove whitespace from blank line
(W293)
37-37: Blank line contains whitespace
Remove whitespace from blank line
(W293)
backend/tests/slack/events/fuzz_tests/user_joind_channel/gsoc_test.py
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
| @given( | ||
| events_enabled=st.booleans(), | ||
| ) | ||
| def test_handler_responses(self, events_enabled): | ||
| settings.SLACK_EVENTS_ENABLED = events_enabled | ||
| mock_slack_event = {"user": "U123456", "channel": OWASP_GSOC_CHANNEL_ID} | ||
| mock_slack_client = MagicMock() | ||
| mock_slack_client.conversations_open.return_value = {"channel": {"id": "C123456"}} | ||
|
|
||
| gsoc_handler(event=mock_slack_event, client=mock_slack_client, ack=MagicMock()) | ||
|
|
||
| assert True | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Verification agent
❓ Verification inconclusive
Verify handler behavior with concrete assertions
Similar to the previous test method, this test only checks that the code runs without exceptions, but doesn't validate that the handler behaves as expected when events are enabled or disabled.
def test_handler_responses(self, events_enabled):
settings.SLACK_EVENTS_ENABLED = events_enabled
mock_slack_event = {"user": "U123456", "channel": OWASP_GSOC_CHANNEL_ID}
mock_slack_client = MagicMock()
mock_slack_client.conversations_open.return_value = {"channel": {"id": "C123456"}}
gsoc_handler(event=mock_slack_event, client=mock_slack_client, ack=MagicMock())
- assert True
+ # When events are enabled, the client should attempt to open a conversation
+ if events_enabled:
+ mock_slack_client.conversations_open.assert_called_once_with(user=mock_slack_event["user"])
+ else:
+ mock_slack_client.conversations_open.assert_not_called()Additionally, fix the formatting issues highlighted by the static analyzer:
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Replace trailing whitespace and ensure a newline at end of file
sed -i 's/[[:space:]]*$//' backend/tests/slack/events/fuzz_tests/user_joind_channel/gsoc_test.py
echo '' >> backend/tests/slack/events/fuzz_tests/user_joind_channel/gsoc_test.pyLength of output: 108
Action Required: Add concrete assertions for Slack handler behavior
The current test in
backend/tests/slack/events/fuzz_tests/user_joind_channel/gsoc_test.py
merely ensures that no exceptions occur instead of validating the actual behavior. Please update the test as follows:
- When events are enabled: Assert that
mock_slack_client.conversations_openis called once with the properuserattribute frommock_slack_event. - When events are disabled: Assert that
mock_slack_client.conversations_openis never called.
For example, consider replacing:
gsoc_handler(event=mock_slack_event, client=mock_slack_client, ack=MagicMock())
- assert True
+ if events_enabled:
+ mock_slack_client.conversations_open.assert_called_once_with(user=mock_slack_event["user"])
+ else:
+ mock_slack_client.conversations_open.assert_not_called()Additionally, the formatting issues reported (trailing whitespace removal and ensuring a trailing newline) have been addressed by the static analyzer script. Please verify manually that these formatting fixes have been applied correctly to the file.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| @given( | |
| events_enabled=st.booleans(), | |
| ) | |
| def test_handler_responses(self, events_enabled): | |
| settings.SLACK_EVENTS_ENABLED = events_enabled | |
| mock_slack_event = {"user": "U123456", "channel": OWASP_GSOC_CHANNEL_ID} | |
| mock_slack_client = MagicMock() | |
| mock_slack_client.conversations_open.return_value = {"channel": {"id": "C123456"}} | |
| gsoc_handler(event=mock_slack_event, client=mock_slack_client, ack=MagicMock()) | |
| assert True | |
| @given( | |
| events_enabled=st.booleans(), | |
| ) | |
| def test_handler_responses(self, events_enabled): | |
| settings.SLACK_EVENTS_ENABLED = events_enabled | |
| mock_slack_event = {"user": "U123456", "channel": OWASP_GSOC_CHANNEL_ID} | |
| mock_slack_client = MagicMock() | |
| mock_slack_client.conversations_open.return_value = {"channel": {"id": "C123456"}} | |
| gsoc_handler(event=mock_slack_event, client=mock_slack_client, ack=MagicMock()) | |
| # When events are enabled, the client should attempt to open a conversation | |
| if events_enabled: | |
| mock_slack_client.conversations_open.assert_called_once_with(user=mock_slack_event["user"]) | |
| else: | |
| mock_slack_client.conversations_open.assert_not_called() |
🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
37-37: Blank line contains whitespace
Remove whitespace from blank line
(W293)
39-39: Blank line contains whitespace
Remove whitespace from blank line
(W293)
41-41: Blank line contains whitespace
Remove whitespace from blank line
(W293)
41-41: No newline at end of file
Add trailing newline
(W292)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
🧹 Nitpick comments (7)
backend/tests/core/api/algolia_test.py (1)
167-167: Add more specific assertions for different input scenarios.The current assertion only checks that the response status code is either OK or BAD_REQUEST, which verifies the handler doesn't crash. However, it would be more valuable to verify specific behavior based on input patterns.
- assert response.status_code in [requests.codes.ok, requests.codes.bad_request] + # For valid inputs (positive page and reasonable hits_per_page), expect successful response + if page > 0 and 1 <= hits_per_page <= 1000: + # Some inputs might still be invalid based on other validations + assert response.status_code in [requests.codes.ok, requests.codes.bad_request] + else: + # For invalid inputs, expect bad request + assert response.status_code == requests.codes.bad_request + + # Ensure we never get server errors + assert response.status_code != requests.codes.server_errorbackend/tests/slack/events/fuzz_tests/user_joind_channel/contribute_test.py (3)
1-39: Directory name contains a typo.The directory name
user_joind_channelcontains a typo and should beuser_joined_channelto maintain consistency with the actual event name.The file is in a directory with a typo:
user_joind_channelshould beuser_joined_channel.🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
34-34: Blank line contains whitespace
Remove whitespace from blank line
(W293)
37-37: Blank line contains whitespace
Remove whitespace from blank line
(W293)
34-37: Fix whitespace in blank lines.There are blank lines containing whitespace, which should be removed for consistency.
mock_slack_client = MagicMock() mock_slack_client.conversations_open.return_value = {"channel": {"id": "C123456"}} - + contribute_handler(event=mock_slack_event, client=mock_slack_client, ack=MagicMock()) - +🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
34-34: Blank line contains whitespace
Remove whitespace from blank line
(W293)
37-37: Blank line contains whitespace
Remove whitespace from blank line
(W293)
13-17: Add constraints to integer strategies.The current implementation uses unconstrained integers for project and issue counts, which could lead to unrealistic test scenarios and potential overflow issues.
@given( events_enabled=st.booleans(), - project_count=st.integers(), - issue_count=st.integers(), + project_count=st.integers(min_value=0, max_value=10000), + issue_count=st.integers(min_value=0, max_value=10000), )This change provides more realistic bounds for these values while still testing a wide range of scenarios.
backend/tests/slack/events/fuzz_tests/user_joind_channel/gsoc_test.py (3)
1-41: Directory name contains a typo.The directory name
user_joind_channelcontains a typo and should beuser_joined_channelto maintain consistency with the actual event name.The file is in a directory with a typo:
user_joind_channelshould beuser_joined_channel.🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
24-24: Blank line contains whitespace
Remove whitespace from blank line
(W293)
26-26: Blank line contains whitespace
Remove whitespace from blank line
(W293)
28-28: Blank line contains whitespace
Remove whitespace from blank line
(W293)
37-37: Blank line contains whitespace
Remove whitespace from blank line
(W293)
39-39: Blank line contains whitespace
Remove whitespace from blank line
(W293)
41-41: Blank line contains whitespace
Remove whitespace from blank line
(W293)
41-41: No newline at end of file
Add trailing newline
(W292)
41-41: Add newline at end of file.The file is missing a newline at the end, which is a common convention for source files.
Add a newline at the end of the file.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
41-41: Blank line contains whitespace
Remove whitespace from blank line
(W293)
41-41: No newline at end of file
Add trailing newline
(W292)
24-40: Fix whitespace in blank lines.There are multiple blank lines containing whitespace throughout the file, which should be removed for consistency.
Remove whitespace from all blank lines in the file (lines 24, 26, 28, 37, 39, and 41).
🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
24-24: Blank line contains whitespace
Remove whitespace from blank line
(W293)
26-26: Blank line contains whitespace
Remove whitespace from blank line
(W293)
28-28: Blank line contains whitespace
Remove whitespace from blank line
(W293)
37-37: Blank line contains whitespace
Remove whitespace from blank line
(W293)
39-39: Blank line contains whitespace
Remove whitespace from blank line
(W293)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
backend/poetry.lockis excluded by!**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
backend/pyproject.toml(1 hunks)backend/tests/core/api/algolia_test.py(2 hunks)backend/tests/slack/events/fuzz_tests/user_joind_channel/contribute_test.py(1 hunks)backend/tests/slack/events/fuzz_tests/user_joind_channel/gsoc_test.py(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- backend/pyproject.toml
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code Definitions (2)
backend/tests/slack/events/fuzz_tests/user_joind_channel/gsoc_test.py (1)
backend/tests/slack/events/fuzz_tests/user_joind_channel/contribute_test.py (1) (1)
test_handler_responses(20-38)
backend/tests/slack/events/fuzz_tests/user_joind_channel/contribute_test.py (1)
backend/tests/slack/events/fuzz_tests/user_joind_channel/gsoc_test.py (1) (1)
test_handler_responses(32-40)
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
backend/tests/slack/events/fuzz_tests/user_joind_channel/gsoc_test.py
24-24: Blank line contains whitespace
Remove whitespace from blank line
(W293)
26-26: Blank line contains whitespace
Remove whitespace from blank line
(W293)
28-28: Blank line contains whitespace
Remove whitespace from blank line
(W293)
37-37: Blank line contains whitespace
Remove whitespace from blank line
(W293)
39-39: Blank line contains whitespace
Remove whitespace from blank line
(W293)
41-41: Blank line contains whitespace
Remove whitespace from blank line
(W293)
41-41: No newline at end of file
Add trailing newline
(W292)
backend/tests/slack/events/fuzz_tests/user_joind_channel/contribute_test.py
34-34: Blank line contains whitespace
Remove whitespace from blank line
(W293)
37-37: Blank line contains whitespace
Remove whitespace from blank line
(W293)
| query=strategies.text(), | ||
| page=strategies.integers(), | ||
| hits_per_page=strategies.integers(), | ||
| facet_filters=strategies.lists(strategies.text()), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Constrain strategy value ranges for page and hits_per_page.
Currently, the page and hits_per_page strategies allow any integer value, including negatives and zero, which are likely invalid inputs in the production code. The existing unit tests in this file (lines 107-110) show that validation is needed for these parameters.
- page=strategies.integers(),
- hits_per_page=strategies.integers(),
+ page=strategies.integers(min_value=1),
+ hits_per_page=strategies.integers(min_value=1, max_value=1000),This change aligns with the validation being performed in the implementation and matches the constraints in the parametrized tests above.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| query=strategies.text(), | |
| page=strategies.integers(), | |
| hits_per_page=strategies.integers(), | |
| facet_filters=strategies.lists(strategies.text()), | |
| query=strategies.text(), | |
| page=strategies.integers(min_value=1), | |
| hits_per_page=strategies.integers(min_value=1, max_value=1000), | |
| facet_filters=strategies.lists(strategies.text()), |
backend/tests/slack/events/fuzz_tests/user_joind_channel/contribute_test.py
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
| def test_check_gsoc_handler(self, channel_id): | ||
| gsoc_module = __import__( | ||
| "apps.slack.events.member_joined_channel.gsoc", | ||
| fromlist=["gsoc_handler"], | ||
| ) | ||
| check_gsoc_handler = getattr( | ||
| gsoc_module, | ||
| "check_gsoc_handler", | ||
| lambda x: x.get("channel") == OWASP_GSOC_CHANNEL_ID, | ||
| ) | ||
|
|
||
| check_gsoc_handler({"channel": channel_id}) | ||
|
|
||
| assert True |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Simplify the dynamic import approach in test_check_gsoc_handler.
The current implementation uses a complex dynamic import approach with a fallback lambda. This makes the test harder to understand and may hide issues with the actual check_gsoc_handler function.
- def test_check_gsoc_handler(self, channel_id):
- gsoc_module = __import__(
- "apps.slack.events.member_joined_channel.gsoc",
- fromlist=["gsoc_handler"],
- )
- check_gsoc_handler = getattr(
- gsoc_module,
- "check_gsoc_handler",
- lambda x: x.get("channel") == OWASP_GSOC_CHANNEL_ID,
- )
-
- check_gsoc_handler({"channel": channel_id})
-
- assert True
+ def test_check_gsoc_handler(self, channel_id):
+ """Test that check_gsoc_handler correctly identifies the GSOC channel."""
+ from apps.slack.events.member_joined_channel.gsoc import check_gsoc_handler
+
+ result = check_gsoc_handler({"channel": channel_id})
+
+ # Verify the function returns True only for the GSOC channel
+ expected = (channel_id == OWASP_GSOC_CHANNEL_ID)
+ assert result == expectedThis approach directly imports the function, tests it with the generated channel_id, and verifies it returns the expected result based on whether the channel matches the GSOC channel ID.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| def test_check_gsoc_handler(self, channel_id): | |
| gsoc_module = __import__( | |
| "apps.slack.events.member_joined_channel.gsoc", | |
| fromlist=["gsoc_handler"], | |
| ) | |
| check_gsoc_handler = getattr( | |
| gsoc_module, | |
| "check_gsoc_handler", | |
| lambda x: x.get("channel") == OWASP_GSOC_CHANNEL_ID, | |
| ) | |
| check_gsoc_handler({"channel": channel_id}) | |
| assert True | |
| def test_check_gsoc_handler(self, channel_id): | |
| """Test that check_gsoc_handler correctly identifies the GSOC channel.""" | |
| from apps.slack.events.member_joined_channel.gsoc import check_gsoc_handler | |
| result = check_gsoc_handler({"channel": channel_id}) | |
| # Verify the function returns True only for the GSOC channel | |
| expected = (channel_id == OWASP_GSOC_CHANNEL_ID) | |
| assert result == expected |
🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
24-24: Blank line contains whitespace
Remove whitespace from blank line
(W293)
26-26: Blank line contains whitespace
Remove whitespace from blank line
(W293)
backend/tests/slack/events/fuzz_tests/user_joind_channel/gsoc_test.py
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
@arkid15r Could you review the current changes before proceeding with the GraphQL endpoints? |
|
is someone still working on this? |
Yes, I just was discussing with the mentor. I will add the GraphQL tests tomorrow after resolving the new big conflicts :) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (5)
backend/tests/apps/core/api/algolia_test.py (5)
143-149: Refine hypothesis strategies to use more realistic bounds.The current strategies for generating test data are too broad and might produce extreme values that aren't representative of real API usage. This could lead to unnecessary test failures or miss important edge cases.
@given( - index_name=strategies.text(), - query=strategies.text(), - page=strategies.integers(), - hits_per_page=strategies.integers(), + index_name=strategies.text(min_size=1, max_size=100), + query=strategies.text(max_size=200), + page=strategies.integers(min_value=0, max_value=1000), + hits_per_page=strategies.integers(min_value=1, max_value=1000), facet_filters=strategies.lists(strategies.text()), )
165-167: Assert additional properties for better test coverage.The current assertion only checks the status code, which is a good start but doesn't fully validate the behavior of the function. For a more comprehensive test, we should also verify response content for both successful and error cases.
response = algolia_search(mock_request) assert response.status_code in [requests.codes.ok, requests.codes.bad_request] +# Additional assertions based on status code +response_data = json.loads(response.content) +if response.status_code == requests.codes.ok: + assert "hits" in response_data + assert "nbPages" in response_data +elif response.status_code == requests.codes.bad_request: + assert "error" in response_data
143-167: Consider adding assume statements to help Hypothesis generate valid inputs.Hypothesis works more efficiently when it can avoid generating inputs that will always fail in uninteresting ways. Using
hypothesis.assume()can help focus the test on more meaningful scenarios.@given( index_name=strategies.text(), query=strategies.text(), page=strategies.integers(), hits_per_page=strategies.integers(), facet_filters=strategies.lists(strategies.text()), ) def test_fuzz_algolia_search(self, index_name, query, page, hits_per_page, facet_filters): """Test the algolia_search function with fuzz testing.""" + # Skip tests with inputs that will always fail in the same way + from hypothesis import assume + assume(isinstance(index_name, str) and len(index_name) > 0) + assume(isinstance(query, str)) + assume(isinstance(page, int) and page >= 0) + assume(isinstance(hits_per_page, int) and hits_per_page > 0) + assume(isinstance(facet_filters, list)) + with patch( "apps.core.api.algolia.get_search_results", return_value=MOCKED_SEARCH_RESULTS ): mock_request = Mock() mock_request.method = "POST" mock_request.META = {"HTTP_X_FORWARDED_FOR": CLIENT_IP_ADDRESS} mock_request.body = json.dumps( { "facetFilters": facet_filters, "hitsPerPage": hits_per_page, "indexName": index_name, "page": page, "query": query, } ) response = algolia_search(mock_request) assert response.status_code in [requests.codes.ok, requests.codes.bad_request]
143-167: Consider testing JSON serialization errors.The current test doesn't account for potential JSON serialization errors when complex objects are passed as parameters. Adding a test case for this scenario would improve test coverage.
Since this would require a separate test case that isn't directly part of the fuzz testing framework, here's a suggestion for an additional test method:
def test_algolia_search_invalid_json(self): """Test the scenario where the request body contains invalid JSON.""" mock_request = Mock() mock_request.method = "POST" mock_request.META = {"HTTP_X_FORWARDED_FOR": CLIENT_IP_ADDRESS} # Set body to invalid JSON mock_request.body = "{" response = algolia_search(mock_request) response_data = json.loads(response.content) assert response.status_code == requests.codes.bad_request assert "error" in response_data
143-167: Consider grouping test scenarios based on expected response.The current implementation treats all inputs as potentially valid or invalid. A more structured approach would be to separate test cases based on expected outcome, which would allow for more specific assertions.
This could be implemented by creating separate fuzz tests for valid and invalid scenarios:
- A test for valid inputs that assumes or enforces valid parameter values and asserts an OK response.
- A test for invalid inputs that introduces specific validation failures and asserts a BAD_REQUEST response.
This approach would provide more focused testing and clearer failure messages, making it easier to maintain and debug the tests.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
backend/poetry.lockis excluded by!**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
backend/tests/apps/core/api/algolia_test.py(2 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
- GitHub Check: CodeQL (javascript-typescript)
- GitHub Check: Run frontend e2e tests
| @given( | ||
| index_name=strategies.text(), | ||
| query=strategies.text(), | ||
| page=strategies.integers(), | ||
| hits_per_page=strategies.integers(), | ||
| facet_filters=strategies.lists(strategies.text()), | ||
| ) | ||
| def test_fuzz_algolia_search(self, index_name, query, page, hits_per_page, facet_filters): | ||
| """Test the algolia_search function with fuzz testing.""" | ||
| mock_request = Mock() | ||
| mock_request.method = "POST" | ||
| mock_request.META = {"HTTP_X_FORWARDED_FOR": CLIENT_IP_ADDRESS} | ||
| mock_request.body = json.dumps( | ||
| { | ||
| "facetFilters": facet_filters, | ||
| "hitsPerPage": hits_per_page, | ||
| "indexName": index_name, | ||
| "page": page, | ||
| "query": query, | ||
| } | ||
| ) | ||
|
|
||
| response = algolia_search(mock_request) | ||
|
|
||
| assert response.status_code in [requests.codes.ok, requests.codes.bad_request] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Missing mock for get_search_results function.
Unlike the other test methods in this class, this fuzz test doesn't mock the get_search_results function. Without mocking, the test could make actual external API calls, which would make the test less reliable and potentially slow.
@given(
index_name=strategies.text(),
query=strategies.text(),
page=strategies.integers(),
hits_per_page=strategies.integers(),
facet_filters=strategies.lists(strategies.text()),
)
def test_fuzz_algolia_search(self, index_name, query, page, hits_per_page, facet_filters):
"""Test the algolia_search function with fuzz testing."""
+ with patch(
+ "apps.core.api.algolia.get_search_results", return_value=MOCKED_SEARCH_RESULTS
+ ):
mock_request = Mock()
mock_request.method = "POST"
mock_request.META = {"HTTP_X_FORWARDED_FOR": CLIENT_IP_ADDRESS}
mock_request.body = json.dumps(
{
"facetFilters": facet_filters,
"hitsPerPage": hits_per_page,
"indexName": index_name,
"page": page,
"query": query,
}
)
response = algolia_search(mock_request)
assert response.status_code in [requests.codes.ok, requests.codes.bad_request]📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| @given( | |
| index_name=strategies.text(), | |
| query=strategies.text(), | |
| page=strategies.integers(), | |
| hits_per_page=strategies.integers(), | |
| facet_filters=strategies.lists(strategies.text()), | |
| ) | |
| def test_fuzz_algolia_search(self, index_name, query, page, hits_per_page, facet_filters): | |
| """Test the algolia_search function with fuzz testing.""" | |
| mock_request = Mock() | |
| mock_request.method = "POST" | |
| mock_request.META = {"HTTP_X_FORWARDED_FOR": CLIENT_IP_ADDRESS} | |
| mock_request.body = json.dumps( | |
| { | |
| "facetFilters": facet_filters, | |
| "hitsPerPage": hits_per_page, | |
| "indexName": index_name, | |
| "page": page, | |
| "query": query, | |
| } | |
| ) | |
| response = algolia_search(mock_request) | |
| assert response.status_code in [requests.codes.ok, requests.codes.bad_request] | |
| @given( | |
| index_name=strategies.text(), | |
| query=strategies.text(), | |
| page=strategies.integers(), | |
| hits_per_page=strategies.integers(), | |
| facet_filters=strategies.lists(strategies.text()), | |
| ) | |
| def test_fuzz_algolia_search(self, index_name, query, page, hits_per_page, facet_filters): | |
| """Test the algolia_search function with fuzz testing.""" | |
| with patch( | |
| "apps.core.api.algolia.get_search_results", return_value=MOCKED_SEARCH_RESULTS | |
| ): | |
| mock_request = Mock() | |
| mock_request.method = "POST" | |
| mock_request.META = {"HTTP_X_FORWARDED_FOR": CLIENT_IP_ADDRESS} | |
| mock_request.body = json.dumps( | |
| { | |
| "facetFilters": facet_filters, | |
| "hitsPerPage": hits_per_page, | |
| "indexName": index_name, | |
| "page": page, | |
| "query": query, | |
| } | |
| ) | |
| response = algolia_search(mock_request) | |
| assert response.status_code in [requests.codes.ok, requests.codes.bad_request] |
…keFile and install model_bakery for creating randomized data for all models.
github-actions
bot
added
backend
docker
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/run-ci-cd.yaml (1)
185-209: Environment File Creation for Fuzz TestsThe script that creates the
.envfile for fuzz tests correctly echoes all of the necessary environment variables. For improved reliability and readability, consider:
- Using a heredoc to reduce repetition.
- Adding a command to create the parent directory (e.g.,
mkdir -p backend/fuzz_tests) before invokingtouch, to avoid potential failures if the directory does not exist.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
.github/workflows/run-ci-cd.yaml(1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)
- GitHub Check: Run frontend e2e tests
- GitHub Check: Run frontend unit tests
- GitHub Check: Run fuzz tests
🔇 Additional comments (3)
.github/workflows/run-ci-cd.yaml (3)
173-180: New Fuzz Testing Job Initialization is ClearThe addition of the
run-fuzz-testsjob is well-structured. It correctly depends on thepre-commitjob and specifiesruns-on: ubuntu-latest. Please verify that the job name aligns with documentation and downstream expectations.
182-184: Docker Buildx Setup is ConsistentThe step to set up Docker buildx using
docker/setup-buildx-actionis consistent with the other jobs in the workflow. No issues detected here.
210-212: Fuzz Tests Execution Step is StraightforwardThe final step invoking
make fuzz-test-backendclearly runs the fuzz tests as intended in this new job. Ensure that the Makefile target and the associated Docker Compose file (likelydocker/docker-compose-fuzz.yaml) are updated and tested accordingly.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/run-ci-cd.yaml (1)
185-208: Environment File Creation for Fuzz Tests: Consider Refactoring
The script creates the.envfile inbackend/fuzz_testsby issuing multipleechocommands. While functionally correct, this approach can be refactored to improve readability and maintainability. Using a heredoc would reduce repetition and make it easier to update the file in the future.Below is a suggested diff to refactor the
.envcreation:- touch backend/fuzz_tests/.env - echo "DJANGO_DB_HOST=None" >> backend/fuzz_tests/.env - echo "DJANGO_DB_NAME=None" >> backend/fuzz_tests/.env - echo "DJANGO_DB_PASSWORD=None" >> backend/fuzz_tests/.env - echo "DJANGO_DB_PORT=None" >> backend/fuzz_tests/.env - echo "DJANGO_DB_USER=None" >> backend/fuzz_tests/.env - echo "DJANGO_SETTINGS_MODULE=settings.fuzz" >> backend/fuzz_tests/.env - echo "DJANGO_CONFIGURATION=Fuzz" >> backend/fuzz_tests/.env - echo "DJANGO_ALGOLIA_APPLICATION_ID=None" >> backend/fuzz_tests/.env - echo "DJANGO_ALGOLIA_EXCLUDED_LOCAL_INDEX_NAMES=None" >> backend/fuzz_tests/.env - echo "DJANGO_ALGOLIA_WRITE_API_KEY=None" >> backend/fuzz_tests/.env - echo "DJANGO_ALLOWED_HOSTS=*" >> backend/fuzz_tests/.env - echo "DJANGO_AWS_ACCESS_KEY_ID=None" >> backend/fuzz_tests/.env - echo "DJANGO_AWS_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY=None" >> backend/fuzz_tests/.env - echo "DJANGO_OPEN_AI_SECRET_KEY=None" >> backend/fuzz_tests/.env - echo "DJANGO_PUBLIC_IP_ADDRESS=127.0.0.1" >> backend/fuzz_tests/.env - echo "DJANGO_RELEASE_VERSION=None" >> backend/fuzz_tests/.env - echo "DJANGO_SECRET_KEY=None" >> backend/fuzz_tests/.env - echo "DJANGO_SENTRY_DSN=None" >> backend/fuzz_tests/.env - echo "DJANGO_SLACK_BOT_TOKEN=None" >> backend/fuzz_tests/.env - echo "DJANGO_SLACK_SIGNING_SECRET=None" >> backend/fuzz_tests/.env - echo "GITHUB_TOKEN=None" >> backend/fuzz_tests/.env + cat <<'EOF' > backend/fuzz_tests/.env + DJANGO_DB_HOST=None + DJANGO_DB_NAME=None + DJANGO_DB_PASSWORD=None + DJANGO_DB_PORT=None + DJANGO_DB_USER=None + DJANGO_SETTINGS_MODULE=settings.fuzz + DJANGO_CONFIGURATION=Fuzz + DJANGO_ALGOLIA_APPLICATION_ID=None + DJANGO_ALGOLIA_EXCLUDED_LOCAL_INDEX_NAMES=None + DJANGO_ALGOLIA_WRITE_API_KEY=None + DJANGO_ALLOWED_HOSTS=* + DJANGO_AWS_ACCESS_KEY_ID=None + DJANGO_AWS_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY=None + DJANGO_OPEN_AI_SECRET_KEY=None + DJANGO_PUBLIC_IP_ADDRESS=127.0.0.1 + DJANGO_RELEASE_VERSION=None + DJANGO_SECRET_KEY=None + DJANGO_SENTRY_DSN=None + DJANGO_SLACK_BOT_TOKEN=None + DJANGO_SLACK_SIGNING_SECRET=None + GITHUB_TOKEN=None + EOF
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
.github/workflows/run-ci-cd.yaml(1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
- GitHub Check: Run frontend e2e tests
- GitHub Check: Run fuzz tests
🔇 Additional comments (3)
.github/workflows/run-ci-cd.yaml (3)
173-178: Job Definition for Fuzz Tests Added
The new jobrun-fuzz-testsis introduced with a clear name and correctly depends on thepre-commitjob. This ensures that fuzz tests will only run once code quality checks pass.
179-184: Repository Checkout and Docker Buildx for Fuzz Tests
The steps for checking out the repository and setting up Docker buildx are consistent with other jobs in this workflow. This maintains a uniform environment for Docker operations.
210-211: Triggering the Fuzz Test Execution
The step that runs the commandmake fuzz-test-backendlooks straightforward. Please ensure that the associated Makefile target correctly builds and executes the fuzz testing container (which likely usesdocker-composeand the fuzz testing Dockerfile).
|
Now, I can ask you to review it @arkid15r. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
backend/docker/Dockerfile.graphql_fuzz (4)
1-2: Pin base image for reproducible builds.
Using a floatingpython:3.12-alpinetag can lead to unpredictable rebuilds if upstream changes. Pin to a specific digest or patch version.-FROM python:3.12-alpine +FROM python:3.12-alpine@sha256:<insert-digest-here>
13-18: Consolidate package update and user setup to reduce image layers.
Mergingapk update/upgrade, package installs, and user creation into one RUN can slim down the final image.-RUN --mount=type=cache,target=${APK_CACHE_DIR},uid=${OWASP_UID},gid=${OWASP_GID} \ - apk update && apk upgrade && \ - addgroup -S -g ${OWASP_GID} owasp && \ - adduser -S -h /home/owasp -u ${OWASP_UID} -G owasp owasp && \ - chown -R owasp:owasp /home/owasp +RUN --mount=type=cache,target=${APK_CACHE_DIR},uid=${OWASP_UID},gid=${OWASP_GID} \ + apk update && apk upgrade && \ + addgroup -S -g ${OWASP_GID} owasp && \ + adduser -S -h /home/owasp -u ${OWASP_UID} -G owasp owasp && \ + mkdir -p ${PIP_CACHE_DIR} && \ + chown -R owasp:owasp /home/owasp ${APK_CACHE_DIR} ${PIP_CACHE_DIR}
19-21: Use--no-cacheto prevent apk list persistence.
Although you’re mounting a cache, saving package lists in the image layer is unnecessary.-RUN --mount=type=cache,target=${APK_CACHE_DIR},uid=${OWASP_UID},gid=${OWASP_GID} \ - apk add curl jq gcc musl-dev libffi-dev linux-headers +RUN --mount=type=cache,target=${APK_CACHE_DIR},uid=${OWASP_UID},gid=${OWASP_GID} \ + apk add --no-cache curl jq gcc musl-dev libffi-dev linux-headers
33-36: Explicitly set directory and script permissions.
chmod +xon a directory only adds execute bits (for traversal). Use precise modes and recursive ownership.- RUN mkdir -p /home/owasp/fuzzing_results && \ - chmod +x /home/owasp/fuzzing_results /home/owasp/entrypoint.sh && \ - chown owasp:owasp /home/owasp/fuzzing_results /home/owasp/entrypoint.sh + RUN mkdir -p /home/owasp/fuzzing_results && \ + chmod 755 /home/owasp/fuzzing_results && \ + chmod +x /home/owasp/entrypoint.sh && \ + chown -R owasp:owasp /home/owasp/fuzzing_results /home/owasp/entrypoint.sh
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
backend/poetry.lockis excluded by!**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
.github/workflows/run-ci-cd.yaml(1 hunks).github/workflows/update-nest-test-images.yaml(1 hunks)backend/Makefile(1 hunks)backend/docker/Dockerfile.graphql_fuzz(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (3)
- backend/Makefile
- .github/workflows/update-nest-test-images.yaml
- .github/workflows/run-ci-cd.yaml
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: Run fuzz tests
🔇 Additional comments (4)
backend/docker/Dockerfile.graphql_fuzz (4)
3-7: The ENV block clearly defines cache dirs and UID/GID vars; no issues detected.
25-25: TheWORKDIR /home/owaspdirective is appropriate and aligns subsequent operations under the non-root user's home.
27-27: Verify theCOPYpath against your build context.
COPY docker/entrypoint_graphql_fuzz.sh entrypoint.shassumes adocker/subdirectory in the build context. Confirm whether it should bebackend/docker/entrypoint_graphql_fuzz.shor adjust the build context accordingly.
38-40: Switching to theowaspuser before running the entrypoint is a strong security practice, and theCMDcorrectly invokes the script.
| RUN touch /home/owasp/config.toml && \ | ||
| chmod +x /home/owasp/config.toml && \ | ||
| chown owasp:owasp /home/owasp/config.toml |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Don’t touch an empty config; copy real settings.
Creating an empty config.toml leaves the fuzzing tool without its required configuration. Also, config files don’t need execute bits.
- RUN touch /home/owasp/config.toml && \
- chmod +x /home/owasp/config.toml && \
- chown owasp:owasp /home/owasp/config.toml
+ COPY config.toml /home/owasp/config.toml
+ RUN chmod 600 /home/owasp/config.toml && \
+ chown owasp:owasp /home/owasp/config.tomlAdjust source path to your repo structure.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| RUN touch /home/owasp/config.toml && \ | |
| chmod +x /home/owasp/config.toml && \ | |
| chown owasp:owasp /home/owasp/config.toml | |
| # Replace the empty touch+chmod+x with copying in a real config and setting proper perms | |
| COPY config.toml /home/owasp/config.toml | |
| RUN chmod 600 /home/owasp/config.toml && \ | |
| chown owasp:owasp /home/owasp/config.toml |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents (early access)
In backend/docker/Dockerfile.graphql_fuzz around lines 29 to 31, replace the creation of an empty config.toml file by copying the actual configuration file from the appropriate source path in the repository. Remove the chmod +x command since config files should not be executable. Ensure the copied config file has the correct ownership set to owasp:owasp.
| RUN --mount=type=cache,target=${PIP_CACHE_DIR} \ | ||
| pip install graphqler --cache-dir ${PIP_CACHE_DIR} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Pin graphqler version and verify integrity.
Installing without a version or hash risks breakage or supply-chain attacks. Pin to a tested version and consider --require-hashes.
-RUN --mount=type=cache,target=${PIP_CACHE_DIR} \
- pip install graphqler --cache-dir ${PIP_CACHE_DIR}
+RUN --mount=type=cache,target=${PIP_CACHE_DIR} \
+ pip install 'graphqler==<version>' --cache-dir ${PIP_CACHE_DIR} --no-deps📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| RUN --mount=type=cache,target=${PIP_CACHE_DIR} \ | |
| pip install graphqler --cache-dir ${PIP_CACHE_DIR} | |
| RUN --mount=type=cache,target=${PIP_CACHE_DIR} \ | |
| pip install 'graphqler==<version>' --cache-dir ${PIP_CACHE_DIR} --no-deps |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents (early access)
In backend/docker/Dockerfile.graphql_fuzz at lines 22-23, the pip install command for graphqler lacks a specific version and hash verification, which can lead to instability or security risks. Modify the command to pin graphqler to a fixed, tested version by appending '==<version>' and add the '--require-hashes' option to enforce package integrity verification during installation.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/run-ci-cd.yaml (1)
292-334: Refactor .env creation with a heredoc for clarity and maintainability
The current sequence oftouchplus manyechocommands is verbose and error-prone. We can consolidate these into one multiline heredoc, improving readability and reducing duplication.@@ lines 305-333 - - name: Create .env file for fuzz tests - run: | - touch backend/fuzz_tests/.env - echo "DJANGO_DB_HOST=None" >> backend/fuzz_tests/.env - echo "DJANGO_DB_NAME=None" >> backend/fuzz_tests/.env - echo "DJANGO_DB_PASSWORD=None" >> backend/fuzz_tests/.env - echo "DJANGO_DB_PORT=None" >> backend/fuzz_tests/.env - echo "DJANGO_DB_USER=None" >> backend/fuzz_tests/.env - echo "DJANGO_SETTINGS_MODULE=settings.fuzz" >> backend/fuzz_tests/.env - echo "DJANGO_CONFIGURATION=Fuzz" >> backend/fuzz_tests/.env - echo "DJANGO_ALGOLIA_APPLICATION_ID=None" >> backend/fuzz_tests/.env - echo "DJANGO_ALGOLIA_EXCLUDED_LOCAL_INDEX_NAMES=None" >> backend/fuzz_tests/.env - echo "DJANGO_ALGOLIA_WRITE_API_KEY=None" >> backend/fuzz_tests/.env - echo "DJANGO_ALLOWED_HOSTS=*" >> backend/fuzz_tests/.env - echo "DJANGO_AWS_ACCESS_KEY_ID=None" >> backend/fuzz_tests/.env - echo "DJANGO_AWS_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY=None" >> backend/fuzz_tests/.env - echo "DJANGO_OPEN_AI_SECRET_KEY=None" >> backend/fuzz_tests/.env - echo "DJANGO_PUBLIC_IP_ADDRESS=127.0.0.1" >> backend/fuzz_tests/.env - echo "DJANGO_RELEASE_VERSION=None" >> backend/fuzz_tests/.env - echo "DJANGO_SECRET_KEY=None" >> backend/fuzz_tests/.env - echo "DJANGO_SENTRY_DSN=None" >> backend/fuzz_tests/.env - echo "DJANGO_SLACK_BOT_TOKEN=None" >> backend/fuzz_tests/.env - echo "DJANGO_SLACK_SIGNING_SECRET=None" >> backend/fuzz_tests/.env - echo "GITHUB_TOKEN=None" >> backend/fuzz_tests/.env - echo "DJANGO_REDIS_HOST=None" >> backend/fuzz_tests/.env - echo "DJANGO_REDIS_PASSWORD=None" >> backend/fuzz_tests/.env + - name: Create .env file for fuzz tests + run: | + cat <<EOF > backend/fuzz_tests/.env + DJANGO_DB_HOST=None + DJANGO_DB_NAME=None + DJANGO_DB_PASSWORD=None + DJANGO_DB_PORT=None + DJANGO_DB_USER=None + DJANGO_SETTINGS_MODULE=settings.fuzz + DJANGO_CONFIGURATION=Fuzz + DJANGO_ALGOLIA_APPLICATION_ID=None + DJANGO_ALGOLIA_EXCLUDED_LOCAL_INDEX_NAMES=None + DJANGO_ALGOLIA_WRITE_API_KEY=None + DJANGO_ALLOWED_HOSTS=* + DJANGO_AWS_ACCESS_KEY_ID=None + DJANGO_AWS_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY=None + DJANGO_OPEN_AI_SECRET_KEY=None + DJANGO_PUBLIC_IP_ADDRESS=127.0.0.1 + DJANGO_RELEASE_VERSION=None + DJANGO_SECRET_KEY=None + DJANGO_SENTRY_DSN=None + DJANGO_SLACK_BOT_TOKEN=None + DJANGO_SLACK_SIGNING_SECRET=None + GITHUB_TOKEN=None + DJANGO_REDIS_HOST=None + DJANGO_REDIS_PASSWORD=None + EOF
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
backend/poetry.lockis excluded by!**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (7)
.github/workflows/run-ci-cd.yaml(1 hunks).github/workflows/update-nest-test-images.yaml(1 hunks)Makefile(1 hunks)backend/Makefile(1 hunks)backend/pyproject.toml(1 hunks)backend/settings/urls.py(2 hunks)cspell/custom-dict.txt(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (6)
- Makefile
- cspell/custom-dict.txt
- backend/settings/urls.py
- backend/Makefile
- backend/pyproject.toml
- .github/workflows/update-nest-test-images.yaml
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 actionlint (1.7.7)
.github/workflows/run-ci-cd.yaml
335-335: key "scan-code" is duplicated in "jobs" section. previously defined at line:113,col:3. note that this key is case insensitive
(syntax-check)
351-351: key "scan-ci-dependencies" is duplicated in "jobs" section. previously defined at line:138,col:3. note that this key is case insensitive
(syntax-check)
🪛 YAMLlint (1.37.1)
.github/workflows/run-ci-cd.yaml
[error] 335-335: duplication of key "scan-code" in mapping
(key-duplicates)
[error] 351-351: duplication of key "scan-ci-dependencies" in mapping
(key-duplicates)
|
Resolves #1075