Skip to content

Add full coverage for zero coverage files #1648

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Jun 21, 2025

Conversation

bandhan-majumder
Copy link
Contributor

Resolves #1647

PR description:
Added test cases for the files having 0% coverage to cover 100% of coverage.

The coverage can be seen here

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jun 21, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Tests
    • Added comprehensive unit tests for several Django management commands, including restoring backups, matching GitHub users, updating GitHub users, enriching OWASP events, updating OWASP events, and updating OWASP sponsors.
    • Tests cover command help text, argument parsing, inheritance, method behaviors, exception handling, and various edge cases to ensure robust functionality and error management.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Tests
    • Added comprehensive unit tests for multiple Django management commands, including backup restoration, GitHub user matching and updating, and OWASP event and sponsor updates.
    • Tests cover command help text, argument parsing, inheritance, method behaviors, error handling, and output verification across a wide range of scenarios.
    • Extensive use of mocking to simulate dependencies and ensure robust validation of command logic under various conditions.

Walkthrough

Multiple new test modules have been added, each providing comprehensive unit tests for previously uncovered Django management commands across several backend applications. The tests utilize mocking to isolate command logic, verify control flow, and assert correct handling of various scenarios, exceptions, and output, thereby increasing test coverage for files that previously had none.

Changes

Files Change Summary
backend/tests/apps/common/management/commands/restore_backup_test.py Added unit tests for the restore_backup management command, covering normal and exceptional flows, help text, and class inheritance.
backend/tests/apps/github/management/commands/github_match_users_test.py Added unit tests for github_match_users command, including help text, argument parsing, validation logic, leader processing, and handle method.
backend/tests/apps/github/management/commands/github_update_users_test.py Added unit tests for github_update_users command, covering argument parsing, user/contributor aggregation, output, and batch saving.
backend/tests/apps/owasp/management/commands/owasp_enrich_events_test.py Added unit tests for owasp_enrich_events command, including argument parsing, enrichment logic, error handling, and logging.
backend/tests/apps/owasp/management/commands/owasp_update_events_test.py Added unit tests for owasp_update_events command, covering YAML parsing, event updating, and bulk saving under various scenarios.
backend/tests/apps/owasp/management/commands/owasp_update_sponsors_test.py Added unit tests for owasp_update_sponsors command, covering YAML parsing, sponsor updating, and bulk saving under various scenarios.

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Add backend test coverage for files with zero coverage (#1647)

Assessment against linked issues: Out-of-scope changes

No out-of-scope changes were found. All code changes are new test modules directly related to increasing test coverage for previously uncovered files, as specified in the linked issue.


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between aa63e84 and faa0c3f.

📒 Files selected for processing (5)
  • backend/tests/apps/common/management/commands/restore_backup_test.py (1 hunks)
  • backend/tests/apps/github/management/commands/github_match_users_test.py (1 hunks)
  • backend/tests/apps/github/management/commands/github_update_users_test.py (1 hunks)
  • backend/tests/apps/owasp/management/commands/owasp_enrich_events_test.py (1 hunks)
  • backend/tests/apps/owasp/management/commands/owasp_update_sponsors_test.py (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • backend/tests/apps/owasp/management/commands/owasp_update_sponsors_test.py
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
  • backend/tests/apps/github/management/commands/github_update_users_test.py
  • backend/tests/apps/common/management/commands/restore_backup_test.py
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Pylint (3.3.7)
backend/tests/apps/github/management/commands/github_match_users_test.py

[refactor] 204-204: Too many arguments (7/5)

(R0913)


[refactor] 204-204: Too many positional arguments (7/5)

(R0917)


[refactor] 224-224: Too many arguments (10/5)

(R0913)


[refactor] 224-224: Too many positional arguments (10/5)

(R0917)


[refactor] 271-271: Too many arguments (7/5)

(R0913)


[refactor] 271-271: Too many positional arguments (7/5)

(R0917)


[refactor] 292-292: Too many arguments (7/5)

(R0913)


[refactor] 292-292: Too many positional arguments (7/5)

(R0917)

backend/tests/apps/owasp/management/commands/owasp_enrich_events_test.py

[refactor] 52-52: Too many arguments (6/5)

(R0913)


[refactor] 52-52: Too many positional arguments (6/5)

(R0917)


[refactor] 82-82: Too many arguments (6/5)

(R0913)


[refactor] 82-82: Too many positional arguments (6/5)

(R0917)


[refactor] 102-102: Too many arguments (6/5)

(R0913)


[refactor] 102-102: Too many positional arguments (6/5)

(R0917)


[refactor] 119-119: Too many arguments (6/5)

(R0913)


[refactor] 119-119: Too many positional arguments (6/5)

(R0917)


[refactor] 143-143: Too many arguments (6/5)

(R0913)


[refactor] 143-143: Too many positional arguments (6/5)

(R0917)


[refactor] 155-155: Too many arguments (6/5)

(R0913)


[refactor] 155-155: Too many positional arguments (6/5)

(R0917)


[refactor] 166-166: Too many arguments (6/5)

(R0913)


[refactor] 166-166: Too many positional arguments (6/5)

(R0917)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (5)
  • GitHub Check: Run frontend unit tests
  • GitHub Check: Run frontend e2e tests
  • GitHub Check: Run backend tests
  • GitHub Check: CodeQL (python)
  • GitHub Check: CodeQL (javascript-typescript)
🔇 Additional comments (14)
backend/tests/apps/github/management/commands/github_match_users_test.py (4)

1-16: Well-structured test file setup.

The imports and fixture setup are appropriate for testing a Django management command with comprehensive mocking capabilities.


17-68: Comprehensive testing of command basics.

The test class covers all essential aspects of the command including help text, inheritance, argument parsing, and user validation with good parametrized test coverage for edge cases.


70-186: Excellent coverage of leader processing scenarios.

The test class comprehensively covers all edge cases including empty inputs, exact matches, fuzzy matches, unmatched leaders, duplicates, and mixed scenarios. The mocking strategy is appropriate and the test logic is sound.


188-313: Thorough testing of the main command execution.

The test class provides comprehensive coverage of the handle method across different model types and scenarios. The extensive mocking is necessary and appropriate for isolating the command logic from Django models.

Note: The static analysis warnings about too many arguments are expected in test methods with extensive mocking and are acceptable in this context.

backend/tests/apps/owasp/management/commands/owasp_enrich_events_test.py (10)

1-14: LGTM! Clean test setup and imports.

The test module is well-structured with appropriate imports, clear documentation, and a proper pytest fixture for the command instance.


17-34: LGTM! Comprehensive basic command testing.

The test class covers essential command properties including help text, inheritance verification, and argument configuration. The mock usage for testing add_arguments is appropriate.


37-51: LGTM! Well-designed test class with proper mocking.

The patch decorators and fixture setup provide excellent isolation for testing the handle method. The mocked stdout in the command fixture is a good practice for testing Django management commands.


52-81: LGTM! Thorough full enrichment test scenario.

This test comprehensively validates the full enrichment flow:

  • Properly mocks event instance with missing data
  • Verifies all generation methods are called
  • Checks sleep delay and bulk save operations
  • Asserts correct field specification in bulk save

The static analysis warning about too many arguments is a false positive - this is standard pytest pattern with multiple patch decorators.


82-101: LGTM! Good partial enrichment test coverage.

The test correctly validates that when summary already exists, the generate_summary method is skipped while other enrichment methods are still called. This demonstrates proper conditional logic testing.


102-118: LGTM! Important edge case testing for missing prompts.

This test ensures the command gracefully handles missing prompts by not calling generation methods when prompts are unavailable. The geolocation method is still called as expected since it doesn't depend on prompts.


119-142: LGTM! Excellent exception handling test.

This test validates proper error handling:

  • Simulates geolocation API failure
  • Verifies exception is logged with appropriate context
  • Confirms sleep is not called during exception scenarios
  • Ensures the command continues gracefully despite errors

143-154: LGTM! Good empty dataset handling.

The test ensures the command handles empty event lists gracefully, still calling bulk_save with an empty list and appropriate fields. This validates the command's robustness with no data.


155-165: LGTM! Proper offset argument testing.

The test validates that the offset parameter correctly applies queryset slicing using slice(2, None), ensuring pagination functionality works as expected.


166-186: LGTM! Complete data scenario testing.

This test ensures efficiency by verifying that when all data already exists:

  • No generation methods are called (avoiding unnecessary work)
  • No sleep delay occurs
  • Bulk save still happens (maintaining consistency)

This demonstrates good optimization logic in the command.

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings
🧪 Generate Unit Tests
  • Create PR with Unit Tests
  • Post Copyable Unit Tests in Comment

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai auto-generate unit tests to generate unit tests for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (16)
backend/tests/apps/common/management/commands/restore_backup_test.py (4)

57-60: Improve exception handling pattern.

The try-except-pass pattern can be replaced with contextlib.suppress for cleaner code, and catching broad exceptions should be avoided in tests.

+import contextlib
+
-        try:
-            command.handle()
-        except Exception:
-            pass
+        with contextlib.suppress(Exception):
+            command.handle()

85-88: Improve exception handling pattern.

Same issue as above - replace try-except-pass with contextlib.suppress.

-        try:
-            command.handle()
-        except Exception:
-            pass
+        with contextlib.suppress(Exception):
+            command.handle()

115-118: Improve exception handling pattern.

Same issue as above - replace try-except-pass with contextlib.suppress.

-        try:
-            command.handle()
-        except Exception:
-            pass
+        with contextlib.suppress(Exception):
+            command.handle()

63-63: Remove whitespace from blank lines.

Clean up formatting by removing trailing whitespace from blank lines.

-        
+

Also applies to: 66-66, 91-91

backend/tests/apps/github/management/commands/github_update_users_test.py (3)

56-56: Simplify handle method calls.

Remove unnecessary dict kwargs when calling the handle method.

-            command.handle(**{"offset": 0})
+            command.handle(offset=0)

Apply similar changes to other occurrences.

Also applies to: 104-104, 140-140, 173-173, 199-199, 229-229


75-79: Remove unused variable.

The calls variable is assigned but never used.

-        assert mock_user.bulk_save.call_count == 2
-        calls = [
-            (([mock_user1, mock_user2],), {'fields': ('contributions_count',)}),
-            (([mock_user1, mock_user2, mock_user3],), {'fields': ('contributions_count',)})
-        ]
+        assert mock_user.bulk_save.call_count == 2
         assert mock_user.bulk_save.call_args_list[-1][0][0] == [mock_user1, mock_user2, mock_user3]

24-24: Clean up formatting.

Remove whitespace from blank lines.

-        
+

Also applies to: 26-26

backend/tests/apps/github/management/commands/github_match_users_test.py (3)

47-60: Fix parametrize decorator format and clean up whitespace.

The parametrize decorator should use a tuple instead of a string, and trailing whitespace should be removed.

-    @pytest.mark.parametrize(
-    "login, name, expected",
+    @pytest.mark.parametrize(
+        ("login", "name", "expected"),
         [
-            ("validlogin", "Valid Name", True),  
-            ("ok", "Valid Name", True),          
-            ("validlogin", "V", False),          
-            ("v", "Valid Name", False),          
-            ("v", "V", False),                   
-            ("", "", False),                     
-            ("validlogin", "", False),           
-            ("", "Valid Name", False),           
-            ("validlogin", None, False),         
+            ("validlogin", "Valid Name", True),
+            ("ok", "Valid Name", True),
+            ("validlogin", "V", False),
+            ("v", "Valid Name", False),
+            ("v", "V", False),
+            ("", "", False),
+            ("validlogin", "", False),
+            ("", "Valid Name", False),
+            ("validlogin", None, False),
         ],
-   )
+    )

201-206: Fix parametrize decorator format.

Same issue with parametrize decorator format.

-    @pytest.mark.parametrize("model_name, model_class_str, relation_field", [
+    @pytest.mark.parametrize(
+        ("model_name", "model_class_str", "relation_field"),
+        [
         ("chapter", "Chapter", "suggested_leaders"),
         ("committee", "Committee", "suggested_leaders"),
         ("project", "Project", "suggested_leaders"),
         ("member", "Member", "suggested_users"),
-    ])
+        ],
+    )

257-257: Replace getattr with direct attribute access.

Since the attribute name is constant, direct access is clearer and safer.

-        getattr(mock_chapter_instance, "suggested_leaders").set.assert_called_once_with(set())
+        mock_chapter_instance.suggested_leaders.set.assert_called_once_with(set())

Also applies to: 274-274

backend/tests/apps/owasp/management/commands/owasp_update_sponsors_test.py (1)

63-63: Fix line length issue.

This line exceeds the 99-character limit.

-        mock_get_content.return_value = "- name: Valid Sponsor\n  url: https://valid.com\n- name: Invalid Sponsor\n  url: https://invalid.com\n"
+        mock_yaml_content = (
+            "- name: Valid Sponsor\n  url: https://valid.com\n"
+            "- name: Invalid Sponsor\n  url: https://invalid.com\n"
+        )
+        mock_get_content.return_value = mock_yaml_content
backend/tests/apps/owasp/management/commands/owasp_update_events_test.py (2)

67-67: Remove whitespace from blank line.

Clean up formatting by removing trailing whitespace.

-        
+

70-72: Fix quote consistency and line length.

Use consistent double quotes and break long lines for better readability.

         mock_event.update_data.assert_has_calls([
-            call("Global Events", {'name': 'Global AppSec', 'url': 'https://globalappsec.com'}, save=False),
-            call("Regional Events", {'name': 'AppSec Conference', 'url': 'https://appsecconf.org'}, save=False),
-            call("Regional Events", {'name': 'AppSec EU', 'url': 'https://appseceu.org'}, save=False),
+            call(
+                "Global Events",
+                {"name": "Global AppSec", "url": "https://globalappsec.com"},
+                save=False,
+            ),
+            call(
+                "Regional Events",
+                {"name": "AppSec Conference", "url": "https://appsecconf.org"},
+                save=False,
+            ),
+            call(
+                "Regional Events",
+                {"name": "AppSec EU", "url": "https://appseceu.org"},
+                save=False,
+            ),
         ], any_order=True)
backend/tests/apps/owasp/management/commands/owasp_enrich_events_test.py (3)

3-3: Remove unused import.

The call import from unittest.mock is not used anywhere in the test file.

-from unittest.mock import MagicMock, patch, call
+from unittest.mock import MagicMock, patch

79-79: Fix formatting issues to comply with project standards.

Several lines exceed the 99-character limit and some blank lines contain whitespace. Please address these formatting issues:

Lines that need to be shortened (consider breaking long lines):

  • Line 79: Method definition
  • Line 102: Mock object definition
  • Line 112: Method definition
  • Line 150: Comment line
  • Line 154: Assertion line

Also remove whitespace from blank lines 111, 128, and 138.

Also applies to: 102-102, 111-111, 112-112, 128-128, 138-138, 150-150, 154-154


51-177: Consider extracting common mock setup to reduce duplication.

While the current test structure is clear and explicit, you could reduce some duplication by extracting common mock event setup into helper methods:

def _create_mock_event(self, summary=None, suggested_location=None, latitude=None, longitude=None, url="http://example.com/event"):
    """Create a mock event instance with specified attributes."""
    return MagicMock(
        url=url,
        summary=summary,
        suggested_location=suggested_location,
        latitude=latitude,
        longitude=longitude
    )

This would make individual tests more concise while maintaining clarity about what data each test is using.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between ff8f279 and 2fb4bd5.

📒 Files selected for processing (6)
  • backend/tests/apps/common/management/commands/restore_backup_test.py (1 hunks)
  • backend/tests/apps/github/management/commands/github_match_users_test.py (1 hunks)
  • backend/tests/apps/github/management/commands/github_update_users_test.py (1 hunks)
  • backend/tests/apps/owasp/management/commands/owasp_enrich_events_test.py (1 hunks)
  • backend/tests/apps/owasp/management/commands/owasp_update_events_test.py (1 hunks)
  • backend/tests/apps/owasp/management/commands/owasp_update_sponsors_test.py (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Ruff (0.11.9)
backend/tests/apps/owasp/management/commands/owasp_update_sponsors_test.py

63-63: Line too long (144 > 99)

(E501)

backend/tests/apps/owasp/management/commands/owasp_update_events_test.py

67-67: Blank line contains whitespace

Remove whitespace from blank line

(W293)


70-70: Single quotes found but double quotes preferred

Replace single quotes with double quotes

(Q000)


70-70: Single quotes found but double quotes preferred

Replace single quotes with double quotes

(Q000)


70-70: Single quotes found but double quotes preferred

Replace single quotes with double quotes

(Q000)


70-70: Single quotes found but double quotes preferred

Replace single quotes with double quotes

(Q000)


70-70: Line too long (108 > 99)

(E501)


71-71: Single quotes found but double quotes preferred

Replace single quotes with double quotes

(Q000)


71-71: Single quotes found but double quotes preferred

Replace single quotes with double quotes

(Q000)


71-71: Single quotes found but double quotes preferred

Replace single quotes with double quotes

(Q000)


71-71: Single quotes found but double quotes preferred

Replace single quotes with double quotes

(Q000)


71-71: Line too long (112 > 99)

(E501)


72-72: Single quotes found but double quotes preferred

Replace single quotes with double quotes

(Q000)


72-72: Single quotes found but double quotes preferred

Replace single quotes with double quotes

(Q000)


72-72: Single quotes found but double quotes preferred

Replace single quotes with double quotes

(Q000)


72-72: Single quotes found but double quotes preferred

Replace single quotes with double quotes

(Q000)


72-72: Line too long (102 > 99)

(E501)

backend/tests/apps/github/management/commands/github_update_users_test.py

24-24: Blank line contains whitespace

Remove whitespace from blank line

(W293)


26-26: Blank line contains whitespace

Remove whitespace from blank line

(W293)


39-39: Blank line contains whitespace

Remove whitespace from blank line

(W293)


43-43: Blank line contains whitespace

Remove whitespace from blank line

(W293)


45-45: Blank line contains whitespace

Remove whitespace from blank line

(W293)


56-56: Unnecessary dict kwargs

Remove unnecessary kwargs

(PIE804)


75-75: Local variable calls is assigned to but never used

Remove assignment to unused variable calls

(F841)


76-76: Single quotes found but double quotes preferred

Replace single quotes with double quotes

(Q000)


76-76: Single quotes found but double quotes preferred

Replace single quotes with double quotes

(Q000)


77-77: Single quotes found but double quotes preferred

Replace single quotes with double quotes

(Q000)


77-77: Single quotes found but double quotes preferred

Replace single quotes with double quotes

(Q000)


88-88: Blank line contains whitespace

Remove whitespace from blank line

(W293)


92-92: Blank line contains whitespace

Remove whitespace from blank line

(W293)


104-104: Unnecessary dict kwargs

Remove unnecessary kwargs

(PIE804)


123-123: Line too long (101 > 99)

(E501)


127-127: Blank line contains whitespace

Remove whitespace from blank line

(W293)


131-131: Blank line contains whitespace

Remove whitespace from blank line

(W293)


140-140: Unnecessary dict kwargs

Remove unnecessary kwargs

(PIE804)


158-158: Blank line contains whitespace

Remove whitespace from blank line

(W293)


162-162: Blank line contains whitespace

Remove whitespace from blank line

(W293)


173-173: Unnecessary dict kwargs

Remove unnecessary kwargs

(PIE804)


190-190: Blank line contains whitespace

Remove whitespace from blank line

(W293)


199-199: Unnecessary dict kwargs

Remove unnecessary kwargs

(PIE804)


213-213: Blank line contains whitespace

Remove whitespace from blank line

(W293)


217-217: Blank line contains whitespace

Remove whitespace from blank line

(W293)


219-219: Blank line contains whitespace

Remove whitespace from blank line

(W293)


229-229: Unnecessary dict kwargs

Remove unnecessary kwargs

(PIE804)

backend/tests/apps/owasp/management/commands/owasp_enrich_events_test.py

3-3: unittest.mock.call imported but unused

Remove unused import: unittest.mock.call

(F401)


79-79: Line too long (112 > 99)

(E501)


102-102: Line too long (109 > 99)

(E501)


111-111: Blank line contains whitespace

Remove whitespace from blank line

(W293)


112-112: Line too long (100 > 99)

(E501)


128-128: Blank line contains whitespace

Remove whitespace from blank line

(W293)


138-138: Blank line contains whitespace

Remove whitespace from blank line

(W293)


150-150: Line too long (110 > 99)

(E501)


154-154: Line too long (100 > 99)

(E501)

backend/tests/apps/common/management/commands/restore_backup_test.py

57-60: Use contextlib.suppress(Exception) instead of try-except-pass

Replace with contextlib.suppress(Exception)

(SIM105)


59-60: try-except-pass detected, consider logging the exception

(S110)


59-59: Do not catch blind exception: Exception

(BLE001)


63-63: Blank line contains whitespace

Remove whitespace from blank line

(W293)


66-66: Blank line contains whitespace

Remove whitespace from blank line

(W293)


85-88: Use contextlib.suppress(Exception) instead of try-except-pass

Replace with contextlib.suppress(Exception)

(SIM105)


87-88: try-except-pass detected, consider logging the exception

(S110)


87-87: Do not catch blind exception: Exception

(BLE001)


91-91: Blank line contains whitespace

Remove whitespace from blank line

(W293)


115-118: Use contextlib.suppress(Exception) instead of try-except-pass

Replace with contextlib.suppress(Exception)

(SIM105)


117-118: try-except-pass detected, consider logging the exception

(S110)


117-117: Do not catch blind exception: Exception

(BLE001)

backend/tests/apps/github/management/commands/github_match_users_test.py

22-22: Line too long (113 > 99)

(E501)


32-32: Blank line contains whitespace

Remove whitespace from blank line

(W293)


48-48: Wrong type passed to first argument of pytest.mark.parametrize; expected tuple

Use a tuple for the first argument

(PT006)


50-50: Trailing whitespace

Remove trailing whitespace

(W291)


51-51: Trailing whitespace

Remove trailing whitespace

(W291)


52-52: Trailing whitespace

Remove trailing whitespace

(W291)


53-53: Trailing whitespace

Remove trailing whitespace

(W291)


54-54: Trailing whitespace

Remove trailing whitespace

(W291)


55-55: Trailing whitespace

Remove trailing whitespace

(W291)


56-56: Trailing whitespace

Remove trailing whitespace

(W291)


57-57: Trailing whitespace

Remove trailing whitespace

(W291)


58-58: Trailing whitespace

Remove trailing whitespace

(W291)


98-98: Blank line contains whitespace

Remove whitespace from blank line

(W293)


108-108: Ambiguous variable name: l

(E741)


108-108: Line too long (120 > 99)

(E501)


112-112: Blank line contains whitespace

Remove whitespace from blank line

(W293)


122-122: Blank line contains whitespace

Remove whitespace from blank line

(W293)


126-126: Blank line contains whitespace

Remove whitespace from blank line

(W293)


130-130: Blank line contains whitespace

Remove whitespace from blank line

(W293)


163-163: Blank line contains whitespace

Remove whitespace from blank line

(W293)


194-194: Line too long (115 > 99)

(E501)


198-198: Line too long (103 > 99)

(E501)


201-201: Wrong type passed to first argument of pytest.mark.parametrize; expected tuple

Use a tuple for the first argument

(PT006)


207-207: Line too long (166 > 99)

(E501)


216-216: Blank line contains whitespace

Remove whitespace from blank line

(W293)


221-221: Blank line contains whitespace

Remove whitespace from blank line

(W293)


224-224: Blank line contains whitespace

Remove whitespace from blank line

(W293)


225-225: Single quotes found but double quotes preferred

Replace single quotes with double quotes

(Q000)


226-226: Single quotes found but double quotes preferred

Replace single quotes with double quotes

(Q000)


227-227: Single quotes found but double quotes preferred

Replace single quotes with double quotes

(Q000)


230-230: Blank line contains whitespace

Remove whitespace from blank line

(W293)


232-232: Blank line contains whitespace

Remove whitespace from blank line

(W293)


234-234: Blank line contains whitespace

Remove whitespace from blank line

(W293)


236-236: Blank line contains whitespace

Remove whitespace from blank line

(W293)


239-239: Blank line contains whitespace

Remove whitespace from blank line

(W293)


242-242: Blank line contains whitespace

Remove whitespace from blank line

(W293)


243-243: Line too long (117 > 99)

(E501)


248-248: Blank line contains whitespace

Remove whitespace from blank line

(W293)


250-250: Blank line contains whitespace

Remove whitespace from blank line

(W293)


252-252: Blank line contains whitespace

Remove whitespace from blank line

(W293)


253-253: Line too long (101 > 99)

(E501)


256-256: Blank line contains whitespace

Remove whitespace from blank line

(W293)


257-257: Do not call getattr with a constant attribute value. It is not any safer than normal property access.

Replace getattr with attribute access

(B009)


259-259: Line too long (131 > 99)

(E501)


266-266: Blank line contains whitespace

Remove whitespace from blank line

(W293)


268-268: Blank line contains whitespace

Remove whitespace from blank line

(W293)


270-270: Blank line contains whitespace

Remove whitespace from blank line

(W293)


271-271: Line too long (101 > 99)

(E501)


274-274: Do not call getattr with a constant attribute value. It is not any safer than normal property access.

Replace getattr with attribute access

(B009)

🪛 Pylint (3.3.7)
backend/tests/apps/owasp/management/commands/owasp_enrich_events_test.py

[refactor] 51-51: Too many arguments (6/5)

(R0913)


[refactor] 51-51: Too many positional arguments (6/5)

(R0917)


[refactor] 79-79: Too many arguments (6/5)

(R0913)


[refactor] 79-79: Too many positional arguments (6/5)

(R0917)


[refactor] 97-97: Too many arguments (6/5)

(R0913)


[refactor] 97-97: Too many positional arguments (6/5)

(R0917)


[refactor] 112-112: Too many arguments (6/5)

(R0913)


[refactor] 112-112: Too many positional arguments (6/5)

(R0917)


[refactor] 135-135: Too many arguments (6/5)

(R0913)


[refactor] 135-135: Too many positional arguments (6/5)

(R0917)


[refactor] 147-147: Too many arguments (6/5)

(R0913)


[refactor] 147-147: Too many positional arguments (6/5)

(R0917)


[refactor] 156-156: Too many arguments (6/5)

(R0913)


[refactor] 156-156: Too many positional arguments (6/5)

(R0917)

backend/tests/apps/github/management/commands/github_match_users_test.py

[refactor] 194-194: Too many arguments (7/5)

(R0913)


[refactor] 194-194: Too many positional arguments (7/5)

(R0917)


[refactor] 207-207: Too many arguments (10/5)

(R0913)


[refactor] 207-207: Too many positional arguments (10/5)

(R0917)


[refactor] 243-243: Too many arguments (7/5)

(R0913)


[refactor] 243-243: Too many positional arguments (7/5)

(R0917)


[refactor] 259-259: Too many arguments (7/5)

(R0913)


[refactor] 259-259: Too many positional arguments (7/5)

(R0917)

🔇 Additional comments (11)
backend/tests/apps/common/management/commands/restore_backup_test.py (1)

13-37: LGTM! Comprehensive test coverage for successful execution.

The test properly verifies the command's execution flow, ensuring all components are called in the correct order and the transaction context is properly managed.

backend/tests/apps/github/management/commands/github_update_users_test.py (1)

34-80: LGTM! Comprehensive test for default offset scenario.

The test thoroughly validates the command's behavior with default parameters, including user processing, contribution counting, and bulk saving operations.

backend/tests/apps/github/management/commands/github_match_users_test.py (1)

11-65: LGTM! Excellent test structure with fixtures and parametrized tests.

The test organization with fixtures and comprehensive parametrized testing provides thorough coverage of the user validation logic.

backend/tests/apps/owasp/management/commands/owasp_update_sponsors_test.py (2)

11-27: LGTM! Clean test structure with proper fixtures.

The test class is well-organized with appropriate fixtures and follows good testing practices.


39-93: LGTM! Comprehensive test coverage for all scenarios.

The test methods thoroughly cover valid data processing, filtering, empty data handling, and edge cases with appropriate mocking and assertions.

backend/tests/apps/owasp/management/commands/owasp_update_events_test.py (2)

41-76: LGTM! Comprehensive test with detailed assertions.

The test thoroughly validates the command's behavior with complex YAML data, ensuring all events are processed correctly and bulk saved appropriately.


11-27: LGTM! Clean test structure with proper inheritance validation.

The basic test structure and inheritance validation follow good testing practices.

backend/tests/apps/owasp/management/commands/owasp_enrich_events_test.py (4)

17-35: Well-structured basic command tests.

The tests for help text, inheritance, and argument parsing are comprehensive and follow Django testing best practices. Good use of fixtures and clear assertions.


37-50: Excellent use of class-level patches for dependency isolation.

The patching strategy effectively isolates the command logic from external dependencies (Event model, Prompt utility, sleep, logger), which is ideal for unit testing Django management commands.


51-177: Comprehensive test coverage with sound logic.

The test suite covers all major scenarios effectively:

  • Full enrichment flow
  • Partial enrichment when data exists
  • Handling of missing prompts
  • Exception handling and logging
  • Edge cases (no events, offset functionality)
  • No-op scenario when all data exists

The mocking strategy and assertions are appropriate for each test case, ensuring proper isolation and verification of the command's behavior.


1-177: Excellent test organization and structure.

The test file demonstrates best practices for Django management command testing:

  • Clear separation between basic command tests and handle method tests
  • Descriptive test names and docstrings
  • Appropriate use of fixtures and class-level patches
  • Comprehensive coverage of edge cases and error scenarios

This significantly improves the test coverage for the owasp_enrich_events command as intended by the PR objectives.

Signed-off-by: bandhan-majumder <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: bandhan-majumder <[email protected]>
@bandhan-majumder
Copy link
Contributor Author

bandhan-majumder commented Jun 21, 2025

@arkid15r

only one file apps/slack/views.py is having 0% coverage where my tests are failing. Looking into it. Rest of the file which had 0, is having 100 now. The overall coverage is 81.13%.

@arkid15r arkid15r enabled auto-merge June 21, 2025 17:44
Copy link

@arkid15r
Copy link
Collaborator

@coderabbitai review

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jun 21, 2025

✅ Actions performed

Review triggered.

Note: CodeRabbit is an incremental review system and does not re-review already reviewed commits. This command is applicable only when automatic reviews are paused.

Copy link
Collaborator

@arkid15r arkid15r left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Great work @bandhan-majumder!

LGTM 👍

@arkid15r arkid15r added this pull request to the merge queue Jun 21, 2025
Merged via the queue into OWASP:main with commit a931b4c Jun 21, 2025
23 checks passed
@bandhan-majumder bandhan-majumder deleted the feature/zero-to-full-coverage branch June 21, 2025 19:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Backend test coverage for zero coverage files
2 participants