-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 20
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: 🎸 Add verifier for w3c-did identityProof #80
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Changes from all commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -3,3 +3,4 @@ node_modules/ | |
dist/ | ||
.idea | ||
*.iml | ||
.vscode/ |
Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -1 +1,10 @@ | ||
export const INFURA_API_KEY = "92c9a51428b946c1b8c1ac5a237616e4"; | ||
|
||
// DID Universal Resolver parameters | ||
export const BASE_RESOLVER_URL = "https://uniresolver.io"; | ||
export const RESOLVER_VERSION = "1.0"; | ||
export const RESOLVER_PATH = "identifiers"; | ||
|
||
// w3c-dids | ||
export const ETHR_DID_METHOD = "ethr"; | ||
export const SUPPORTED_DID_AUTH = ["Secp256k1SignatureAuthentication2018"]; |
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,63 @@ | ||
export interface Identity { | ||
identified: true; | ||
ethereumAddress: string; | ||
smartContract: string; | ||
} | ||
|
||
export interface DIDDocument { | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I think you can use some of the types/methods from here https://github.com/decentralized-identity/did-common-typescript/blob/master/lib/IDidDocument.ts There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I actually pulled direct from the did-resolver here: https://github.com/decentralized-identity/did-resolver/blob/02bdaf1687151bb934b10093042e576ed54b229c/src/resolver.ts#L15 There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. would it make sense to then install it as a dependency and use the exported types? There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. That feels like a good solution. Then also as types inevitably evolve we can just bump version of the package instead of having to replicate changes manually... I like it. |
||
"@context": "https://w3id.org/did/v1"; | ||
id: string; | ||
publicKey: PublicKey[]; | ||
authentication?: Authentication[]; | ||
uportProfile?: any; | ||
service?: ServiceEndpoint[]; | ||
created?: string; | ||
updated?: string; | ||
proof?: LinkedDataProof; | ||
} | ||
|
||
export interface ServiceEndpoint { | ||
id: string; | ||
type: string; | ||
serviceEndpoint: string; | ||
description?: string; | ||
} | ||
|
||
export interface PublicKey { | ||
id: string; | ||
type: string; | ||
owner: string; | ||
ethereumAddress?: string; | ||
publicKeyBase64?: string; | ||
publicKeyBase58?: string; | ||
publicKeyHex?: string; | ||
publicKeyPem?: string; | ||
} | ||
|
||
export interface Authentication { | ||
type: string; | ||
publicKey: string[]; | ||
} | ||
|
||
export interface LinkedDataProof { | ||
type: string; | ||
created: string; | ||
creator: string; | ||
nonce: string; | ||
signatureValue: string; | ||
} | ||
|
||
export interface Params { | ||
[index: string]: string; | ||
} | ||
|
||
export interface ParsedDID { | ||
did: string; | ||
didUrl: string; | ||
method: string; | ||
id: string; | ||
path?: string; | ||
fragment?: string; | ||
query?: string; | ||
params?: Params; | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
we usually use axios with async/await