Publishing an openEO process as a service

[Pratichhya]

Refreshed @soxofaan's idea of displaying a UDP usecase. The notebook includes section on creating a concrete datacube, inspecting netCDF downloads, and developing a parameterized version stored as a UDP.

[soxofaan]

some initial notes

[m-mohr]

I just saw that there's nothing in the notebook yet about the Web Editor use. Shall I add that at the end of the notebook? I've improved the Web Editor so that we don't need to fiddle with the URL anylonger. Or how is this meant to be integrated in the OREO workshop? @Pratichhya @soxofaan @patrick-griffiths

[jdries]

@m-mohr I think integrating web editor in the notebook would be a good idea as it would also show the feature for people that check it out afterwards.

@Pratichhya maybe one aspect we could still add is giving an indication of cost (in terms of credits per km²) in the description. This would perhaps encourage udp writers to do the same.

[m-mohr]

Added a Web Editor section. Still a bit bland, so I'll add some graphics later today. But the text could get a first review.

[Pratichhya]

@jdries, I included some already existing text on credit usage and also on the service description. I am not sure if this is what you mean. Please let me know if it needs to be updated.

[m-mohr]

I'm a bit confused right now. Why are there two notebooks in this PR? @Pratichhya

[Pratichhya]

@m-mohr, sorry today , I am messing up most of the things. This one is one of those and by mistake, I will remove it. Thank you notifying me.

[Patrick1G]

@Pratichhya could you please add the oreo_utils.py to the repository where the NB sits?