Filter spatial

[masawdah]

Hi team,
together with @clausmichele have implemented spatial_filter process and added a test for it.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #170 (e2f70ba) into main (8588f3d) will increase coverage by 0.11%.
Report is 9 commits behind head on main.
The diff coverage is 75.72%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #170      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   80.12%   80.24%   +0.11%     
==========================================
  Files          29       30       +1     
  Lines        1268     1382     +114     
==========================================
+ Hits         1016     1109      +93     
- Misses        252      273      +21     

Files	Coverage Δ
...ses_dask/process_implementations/cubes/__init__.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
...sses_dask/process_implementations/cubes/_filter.py	78.68% <80.00%> (+0.04%)	⬆️
...dask/process_implementations/cubes/mask_polygon.py	74.39% <74.39%> (ø)

... and 3 files with indirect coverage changes

📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more

[clausmichele]

This PR includes implementations of filter_spatial and mask_polygon. We tested them on full S2 tiles, you also may need to test them on the EODC back-end and report if you see some issues.

Current implementation supports only geoJSON vector-cubes, since currently the load_vector_cube process has not been implemted and we didn't discuss on which data structure to use for it (probably dask-geopandas?)

[clausmichele]

@ValentinaHutter @GeraldIr can you start reviewing this PR?

We would need them for the demo at BIDS!

[GeraldIr]

Just the one question about unused variables, but that doesn't seem to impact the logic of the function, otherwise LGTM!

[clausmichele]

@GeraldIr @ValentinaHutter I think it would be good to test the implementation at EODC with your cluster and with your data, to check how it behaves with large datasets.